|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:55:22 +0100, "Warhol"
wrote: Fair warning: Henry Spencer is OCD and a ...... moron For a moron I sure did pluck your feathers!!!!!! Ok, that it! Trolling in one thing but insulting the patron saint of USENET is another. To the killfile with you! Mark Percival Montreal, Quebec |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Hallerb" wrote in message ... There are many (dozens or hundreds) of photos showing rover tracks. They are pretty visible on the surface, but I doubt would be visible from "overhead". They were not visible from the CSM in orbit. Since the traverses were multiple km, they would be largely undisturbed from the LM liftoff. Well for the missions with rovers. I question wether such disturbances were ever visible from above and what effects 30 years have had. solar wind, impacts, and what little atmosphere the moon had after the last LM left. Primarilty LM exhaust. all of this makes it impossible to know without looking. I would imagine that they would be as pristine as they day they were made. Erosion of features on the moon (through solar wind, micrometeors and heat cycles) proceeds very slowly. What possible mechanism would erode several in deep prints in just thirty years? Also, the oxygen vented from the LM cabins for the EVAs are a much larger contribution to atmosphere than the LM exhaust. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Hallerb" wrote in message ... Well we KNOW that chile telescope will be capable of imaging the lower stage, its been dicscussed before. Has it actually done so yet? If not, then we *don't know* any such thing. At best, we might know that it's theoretically possible. But just how does one research the possible visiblity of a moon rovers trail? You already have several research assignments. Please complete them first before starting a new one. How's your research on the research you did on NASA management prior to posting flames about them? How's your research on figuring out whether or not you researched alternative failure modes for Columbia before posting that was happened was the "worst possible way"? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Ami Silberman" wrote in message ... What possible mechanism would erode several in deep prints in just thirty years? Well, when the Venusian Fire Women party, they party all over the place. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Warhol" wrote in message ... "Herb Schaltegger" lid a écrit dans le message de news: ... Warhol wrote: "Henry Spencer" a écrit dans le message de news: ... In article , Warhol wrote: So you admit, No proof of Man On the Moon Prove to me that you aren't a chimpanzee, or admit that you are. :-) -- MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. | Fair warning: Henry Spencer is OCD and a phucking moron For a moron I sure did pluck your feathers!!!!!! OHHHHHH HO HO HO HO HO HO HO HO aaaaaaaaaaaaahhaahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahha Who loves you Kitty cat KISS KIS You've proven you're either an eleven year old human moron or Henry's contention that you're a chimpanzee. Go away and throw your feces somewhere else. What are you kidding FAKE CORPORAL You are sooo predictable,.... How about a platoon leader or, in exceptional cases, maybe a company commander....... troll v.,n. 1. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. See also YHBT. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Stu Gotz wrote: A week before Apollo 11 was launched, NASA launched an unmanned probe which was placed in lunar orbit. It was explained that the probe was for the purpose of training the Mission Control folks. The same probe could have easily been used to relay radio signals from the Apollo craft which was in low earth orbit. Since the signals were coming via the lunar probe the propagations delays would have been correct. That's nice, and this launching occured when?: http://www.astronautix.com/chrono/19693.htm Keep searching. Say hello to General Zod for me.... (Whirring sound as sheet of Kryptonian glass comes flying out of the red-sunned sky, and yet another one heads off to The Phantom Zone.) :-D Flan-El |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
(followups trimmed to spare some of the groups)
Stu Gotz wrote: Oh you may be the idiot. The unmanned probe was named Tetra, I believe, and it was very real. Mission Control practiced on transmission from the probe in preparation for the Apollo 11 mission. it's not a secret -- NASA has admitted it. The Soviets didn't blow the whistle because joint US-USSR cooperation on the space program began long before the Apollo-Soyut mission. And in case you haven't paid attention to recent history in the past 30 years, the US "loaned" the USSR millions of dollars which they needn't have paid back. In addition, the US bagan selling wheat and other crops to the Soviets beginning around the time of the Apollo missions, most of the credit going to Tricky Nixon. Suffice to say, the Soviets had all sorts of incentives to keep the lid on the Apollo missions. Dream on pal. -- Stu Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahaha ! I see some village is missing its idiot. Suggested name change: Schifosa, or maybe Gavone. -- bp Proud Member of the Human O-Ring Society Since 2003 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Stu Gotz wrote:
Oh you may be the idiot. The unmanned probe was named Tetra, I believe, and it was very real. Mission Control practiced on transmission from the probe in preparation for the Apollo 11 mission. it's not a secret -- NASA has admitted it. Well, you almost got the satellite name correct. Too bad the rest of your story is full of ****. Keep your delusional conspiracy clap-trap to yourself and stop cross-posting to sci.* groups. http://www.clavius.org/techcomm.html for the real story on TETR-A. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. Reformed Aerospace Engineer Remove invalid nonsense for email. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Herb Schaltegger lid wrote: Stu Gotz wrote: Oh you may be the idiot. The unmanned probe was named Tetra, I believe, and it was very real. Mission Control practiced on transmission from the probe in preparation for the Apollo 11 mission. it's not a secret -- NASA has admitted it. Well, you almost got the satellite name correct. Too bad the rest of your story is full of ****. Keep your delusional conspiracy clap-trap to yourself and stop cross-posting to sci.* groups. http://www.clavius.org/techcomm.html for the real story on TETR-A. Herb, I do NOT cross-post anywhere. The only thing that is full of **** is you if you believe the official story. I tried to enlighten you. Ignorance can be fixed; stupidity is forever. -- Stu |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA may have to evacuate ISS if Russian rocket mission fails | Rusty Barton | Space Station | 8 | May 24th 04 09:24 PM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | bart janssens | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | February 9th 04 05:48 PM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 11 | February 1st 04 04:00 AM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Jason Donahue | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | February 1st 04 03:33 AM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Astronaut | Misc | 0 | January 31st 04 03:11 AM |