Deep Thought

On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 11:56:50 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/25/2018 1:31 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am 25.07.2018 um 01:52 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

sci-fi
I have always had a little feeling that the big bang might be
nothing more than a local hyper massive explosion contained within a
much larger universe. Perhaps a cluster of ultra massive black holes
all finally merged together. Wrt a larger universe, the big bang
could be a single pixel in the following rendering:

http://www.fractalforums.com/index.p...=view;id=17379

http://www.fractalforums.com/index.p...=view;id=17386
(a zoom...)

/sci-fi

Nice pictures!

Thank you. :^)


I think, the universe is actually a very large fractal and our little
world is nothing but a 'chapter' in a much larger story.

Think of a fractal where branching points are the result of a shi%
load of hyper massive black holes finally merging together into a
single, crazy massive black hole. Well, think if each branch in the
following online 2d vector field simulation of mine was a universe,
contained within a black hole centered at the point of bifurcation:

http://funwithfractals.atspace.cc/ct..._dynamic_test/

Now, if this works for you, one can click on a point to dynamically
create a new attracting point. Let it run for a couple of minutes,
then click a couple of points within the parametric square.

Fwiw, I am working on an interactive OpenGL 3d version.


Fractals require complex numbers (in '4D') and the universe could
possibly be based on something similar to quaternions or bi-quaternions
(complex four vectors).

This fractal uses 2d vectors

http://funwithfractals.atspace.cc/ct..._dynamic_test/ just uses 2d

with the following main generating function:

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sc...45E/discussion
(read all...)

http://funwithfractals.atspace.cc/ct..._formula..html



I'm actually following this idea and it looks quite promising.

(btw - you may have look at my 'book' he

https://docs.google.com/present/view...tx_3gfzvqgd6Â* )

Will do. Thanks.



To understand the idea of big bang, you need to think about the
underlying axioms of big-bang theory (which are - of course - wrong).

Big-bang is based on a single universal time-line, that starts at the
event called big-bang and ends (for instance) here.#

This cannot possibly be true. One reason: the universe does not look
like an expanding two-dimensional sphere.

Better solution: there are multiple timelines possible and to any
such 'axis of time' belongs a different 'time domaine' which has its
own space.

Such a space could pop out of nowhere and subsequently build a new
'universe'. But that 'universe' is just a local impression and not
universal at all.

Imvvvvho, it did not pop out of "nowhere". I just have a strange
feeling that it was, perhaps never created at all! It was always
there, will continue to be, and will never pass away. Humm... Not sure
at all! I just have a little feeling.

https://www.amazon.de/Zero-Infinity-.../dp/9812709142


The theory of Prof. Peter Rowlands was, that nothing could actually
split into opposite directions. The one side could add to the other to
nothing again, if these sides would ever combine to again (what
apparently does not happen).

That would be a creation out of nothing.

Where did the matter come from? What state was it in before the "big-bang"?

QM came first.All the building particles were getting in place to start the macro realm.BB was its blue print.The great force of gravity took all there was and made it all that is real. We life in a world of reality.G=EMC^2 gives an equation to this truth. Bert

"Herbert Glazier" wrote
"G=EMC^2 gives an equation to this truth" since it is short
for "Glazier Exhibits Micro Cephalic Cretinism" O ya. Bert