Galaxy nucleus, what it reveals about the Universe

A spiral galaxy like the Milky way has a cyllindrical opening as ones
seen with hurricane eyes. It is a system that carries swirling
properties
as galaxies are solar systems which spin, assumingly faster and
more energetically in the center regions. Smaller seemingly quiet
elliptic
galaxies were just recently found to have massive turbulant and
explosive
activities in their centers. I assume as a galaxy would grow, it would
have more distinct spiraling characteristics. In the center of galaxies
are suggested to be found supermassive black holes.

I have in the past few months been wondering about black holes,
why they should or should not occur as Einsteinian wells (on a
sheet) that become so deep in terms of curvature and depth that
nothing can escape them, not even light. It is simple to assume
that a huge star or black hole with supermassive weight is located
in the center of galaxies, something where all surroundings are
sucked into. However on large scales I have found that a spiral
galaxy such as the Milky Way looks like a hurricane storm, with
similar characteristics. It has spiraling tails, two distinct ones,
clearly a system which swirls as it moves slowly over billions of
years. Spiraling galaxies seem to have a ring of stars surrounding
them, so scattered that they are hardly visible. Another finding
which was recently discovered regarding the Milky Way galaxy,
that it has a ring of stars, scattered randomly along a ring a hundred
thousand lightyears diameter, hundreds of Million stars (the Sun is
30 thousand light years from the center of the Galaxy.

The assumption that all spiral galaxies have rings is something
I came up with, but only the Milky Way is known to have it currently.
It was like the assumption just a few years ago that it is not
known that planets exist in other Solar systems. Well. Other
spiral galaxies have a dim ring with scattered old Suns along that
ring.

What else do we know today? No X-Rays are arriving from the
center of spiral galaxies (an quasars). Current black hole theories
predicted that a super-massive black hole generates a very strong
source of radiation. The radiation from galaxies does not
come from the center, it comes from other regions of the galaxy.

Spiraling systems like spiral galaxies carry a storm-current-like
flow dynamics, and have no gravity in their (near) centers. The
galaxy acts as a very large solar system, and the larger the
highly explosive turbulant activity in its central region, the
larger the opening becomes. Our Solar System is part of the
galaxy, its dynamics, and its activity in the epicenter, a central
turbulance involving an overall high volume of energy and motion
requires the presence of a cylindrical shaped opening (due to the
mass a spiral galaxy contains). This shows that gravitation
acts as a system for high volumes, inertial forces which reach
out to great distances to build a system of dynamics with a
central eye, which due to its very high temperatures shines
in North and South directions extremely brightly. I believe most
spiral galaxies have an eye.

Continuing: The ring of stars scattered around spiral galaxies
have a purpose. They feed the galaxy. Tails reach into this
outer ring, usually along two tails matter moves inward. This
ring acts as an atmospheric condition for the spiraling galaxy
which acts as a hurricane storm made up of Solar matter.
This is a storm system which based on reading on hurricanes,
once born feeds its own energy, but takes place in the atmosphere,
which is very complex to interpret. Where did these old stars
come from? Wondering alone in space, left behind from other
galaxies? I would say highly likely that deep space contains
scattered matter which may form small elliptic galaxies by
themselves or get caught up in large galactic solar hurricane
storm centers, sounds like Star Wars.

Quasars are a very important aspect to this theory. Quasars
appeared as very bring source of lights in the sky, and for decades
atronomers were puzzled on how to explain them. Today they
know they are galaxies emitting a very bright source of light,
but where the light comes from which outshines the entire
galaxy in pictures they do not know. They speculate that
perhaps gasses in the galaxy light up, they refer to it as
galaxies on fire.

Simply put, the explanation is that most spiral galaxies should
have an eye, as seen in hurricanes. When the Galaxy faces
right toward earth, the brightness of light coming from the
center of the galaxy is so great, that it outshines the entire
galaxy. Its this open eye that is so hot and energetic which
should be producing the immense light coming from quasars
resulting in a light source outshining the whole galaxy and not
a galaxy which goes on fire and burns with millions of solar
masses.

Its been also shown as I mentioned that its been shown
(reference not found, will search for it one day) no X-Rays
are coming from the center of an active quasar (produces
jets) as was expected by black hole theories that there
should have been a massive black hole producing X-Rays.
Where the X-Rays arrived from instead were not described in
the publication (perhaps arrived from "other surrounding
regions" that may still be a black hole???, or a black
doughnut hole, but the publication did not elaborate, merely
described that no X-Rays were found in the center of the
quasar that was under stody for years, and X-Rays were
collected for 5 years or so).

Summing some of the important elements of this theory:
1. Rings surrounding spiral galaxies.
2. Explaining quasars, why they shine.
3. Hurricane eyes are a natural aspect of large swirling storms,
and similarities can be found in the shape of spiral galaxies
and the question of the eye in the center appears. When do
these eyes become a prominent feature, this can be compared
with thunderstorms and hurricanes. This shows that a storm
eye is naturally part of this galaxy and not necessarily
demanding a central massive object, but swirling and
motion expanding from the central eye which acts as a hurricane
on large scales and not as a supermassive object sucking
everything in.
4. Small elliptic galaxies have been found to have turbulant
explosive properties in their centers, and scientists have
suggested the likelyhood of finding a black hole there.
How prominent are atmospheric forces in regards to
black holes, we see active turbulances in the center of
large accumulating couds as well. When do they turn
into hurricanes with eyes? I wish scientists would not
have rejected my findings and questions.

So it comes down to the conclusion that no supermassive
blackhole exists in the center of spiral galaxies.

(Changed account as Google timed out my 6724 account
for posting more than 15 in 6 hours. The gestapo knows
that no more than one message should be posted on
a message board in a day. They are so off its unbelievable.)

So it may come down to the conclusion that no
super massive black holes may be located in
the center of spiral galaxies, and the center
would be a swirling environment resembling
a hurricane eye, and not a supergiant star forming
a black hole as priorly thought.

Let me sign it, but first I will check the spelling
and grammar, then I'll post it.

Any use for this theory?

Einstein's E=mc2 was of great use.

What's useful about the fact that spiral galaxies
produce bright eyes, so powerful that looking straight
at them from a distance one runs into quasars with
light generated that outshines the whole galaxy
and appears as a very bright star for the lenses
of space telescopes?

Nothing but offering an understanding for quasars.

But that understanding opens a door for something
much larger, used for astronomists to explain
gravity, the big bang, and allows them to move to
distances in space and time never perceived before,
to explaining big bangs, worm holes, white holes and
black holes at a very close scientific proximities.

Well, I'll tell you what, you hop on the first FTL ship to come by and go to
the center of the milkyway and as you pass the event horzen of the one that
is there, you can tell us all what's it's like on the otherside. That is if
you can suvice the massive radation that is to be found in the center and
ofcouse you forgot to say anything about the bar that they've mapped that
connects two of the arms or anything about the small dwarft galaxys that are
being tore apart and are infalling into our galaxy.



--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond

Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Sidewalk Astronomy
www.sidewalkastronomy.info
Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net
In Garden Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden
Blast Off Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/starlords
Astro Blog
http://starlord.bloggerteam.com/




wrote in message
oups.com...
So it may come down to the conclusion that no
super massive black holes may center of spiral galaxies.

nope, value = -0


--
The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond

Telescope Buyers FAQ
http://home.inreach.com/starlord
Sidewalk Astronomy
www.sidewalkastronomy.info
Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net
In Garden Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden
Blast Off Online Gift Shop
http://www.cafepress.com/starlords
Astro Blog
http://starlord.bloggerteam.com/




wrote in message
oups.com...
Any use for this theory?

Einstein's E=mc2 was of great use.

What's useful about the fact that spiral galaxies
produce bright eyes, so powerful that looking straight
at them from a distance one runs into quasars with
light generated that outshines the whole galaxy
and appears as a very bright star for the lenses
of space telescopes?

Nothing but offering an understanding for quasars.