A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

My Pulse Fusion To Be Realized in 2010



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 29th 05, 05:21 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My Pulse Fusion To Be Realized in 2010

Got a call from my friend in Baltimore that they are using my laser
pulse fusion method exactly like I described it to him 20 years ago.
Right down to its foot ball field size. I said it should be housed in a
Texas astrodome. I even theorized using my method of creating the worlds
fastest time lapses to pulse the lasers. I've posted this here and
in Sci Physics science groups many moons ago so you know I'm not bull
****ing you It will work Bert.

  #2  
Old May 29th 05, 05:47 PM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Got a call from my friend in Baltimore that they are using my laser
pulse fusion method exactly like I described it to him 20 years ago.
Right down to its foot ball field size. I said it should be housed in a
Texas astrodome. I even theorized using my method of creating the worlds
fastest time lapses to pulse the lasers. I've posted this here and
in Sci Physics science groups many moons ago so you know I'm not bull
****ing you It will work Bert.



Hmmm. I seem to remember reading about ideas for laser pulse fusion 25
years ago in the Scientific American.

Are you sure this was all your idea, Bert?

Double-A

  #3  
Old May 29th 05, 08:26 PM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Got a call from my friend in Baltimore that they are using my laser
pulse fusion method exactly like I described it to him 20 years ago.
Right down to its foot ball field size. I said it should be housed in a
Texas astrodome. I even theorized using my method of creating the worlds
fastest time lapses to pulse the lasers. I've posted this here and
in Sci Physics science groups many moons ago so you know I'm not bull
****ing you It will work Bert.


Hmmm. I seem to remember reading about ideas for laser pulse fusion 25
years ago in the Scientific American.

Are you sure this was all your idea, Bert?

Double-A


nightbat

Please Officer Double-A, Officer Bert is apparently over tired
and overworked from his Britney sex blow up doll workouts that I warned
him about already. There are no good correlating google pre 2000 post
records because Officer Bert doesn't believe in google remember? And he
has already net explained he takes the best of other thinkers and posts
and weaves them into his own. Since Uncle Al net reported doesn't like
Scientific American, Officer Bert probably felt it was game then for
take over of past presented articles. As I remember Officer Bert
presented through Herb, then Bert, then Treb, on sci.physics his
profound original purported youth enhancing Redwood magic saw dust and
Mexican sweet potatoes. But a laser pulse fusion method would have
required a US Government nuclear regulatory licensing signed Los Alamos
agreement, you know the folks trying to claim Gravistars or Gravastar
fact similar. The advanced fractalization of atomic elements or
molecular compound material make-up via laser pulse fusion impulse
method is way too advanced for simple Earth handling for it might even
be the Darla Starship propulsion based system for all we know. There is
a reason our Princess Darla calls Officer Bert what if friend, for he
has a way of taking profound physics deep thinkers theories and sci fi
compilation and thinking it real.

carry on,
the nightbat
  #4  
Old May 29th 05, 08:56 PM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Got a call from my friend in Baltimore that they are using my laser
pulse fusion method exactly like I described it to him 20 years ago.
Right down to its foot ball field size. I said it should be housed in a
Texas astrodome. I even theorized using my method of creating the worlds
fastest time lapses to pulse the lasers. I've posted this here and
in Sci Physics science groups many moons ago so you know I'm not bull
****ing you It will work Bert.


Hmmm. I seem to remember reading about ideas for laser pulse fusion 25
years ago in the Scientific American.

Are you sure this was all your idea, Bert?

Double-A


nightbat

Please Officer Double-A, Officer Bert is apparently over tired
and overworked from his Britney sex blow up doll workouts that I warned
him about already. There are no good correlating google pre 2000 post
records because Officer Bert doesn't believe in google remember? And he
has already net explained he takes the best of other thinkers and posts
and weaves them into his own. Since Uncle Al net reported doesn't like
Scientific American,



I don't like the new Scientific American either. It reads more like
Popular Science. But the older format articles seemed to offer more of
an intellectual challenge.

Double-A

  #5  
Old May 29th 05, 09:18 PM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Got a call from my friend in Baltimore that they are using my laser
pulse fusion method exactly like I described it to him 20 years ago.
Right down to its foot ball field size. I said it should be housed in a
Texas astrodome. I even theorized using my method of creating the worlds
fastest time lapses to pulse the lasers. I've posted this here and
in Sci Physics science groups many moons ago so you know I'm not bull
****ing you It will work Bert.

Hmmm. I seem to remember reading about ideas for laser pulse fusion 25
years ago in the Scientific American.

Are you sure this was all your idea, Bert?

Double-A


nightbat

Please Officer Double-A, Officer Bert is apparently over tired
and overworked from his Britney sex blow up doll workouts that I warned
him about already. There are no good correlating google pre 2000 post
records because Officer Bert doesn't believe in google remember? And he
has already net explained he takes the best of other thinkers and posts
and weaves them into his own. Since Uncle Al net reported doesn't like
Scientific American,


Double-A
I don't like the new Scientific American either. It reads more like
Popular Science. But the older format articles seemed to offer more of
an intellectual challenge.

Double-A


nightbat

Ha, ha, ha, It's called dumbing down to cover the widest
possible Earth readership possible. That's what happens when an former
intellectual based science magazine is sold to commercial interests
rather then scientific ones. Check out this Uncle Al's opinion of
writers without scientific merit.

See:
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg

Poor Officer Bert's profound dart thrown ideas are many times too
advanced sometimes for ordinary mortal men to presently comprehend.
Thankfully he is one of the elite Earth Science Elect Officers getting
ready to hopefully help us receive Princess Darla, wink, wink,
potentially Star Race Goddess Athena.

carry on,
the nightbat
  #6  
Old May 29th 05, 10:04 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gentlemen Yes lasers for heat has been kicked around, I came up with
this complete idea when Columbia U paid Russia for their tokamak,and
knew it was not good engineering Still I had my own idea(still do) how
the pellet should be structured.Figured out the lapse time between
pulses.How it would be very safe in its transfer of heat. Even figured
out its cost(in billions) and because of the cost if you remember my
posts I mentioned Gates. To say it was all my idea the answer is no. To
say I spent more time than anyone on this I( say maybe. I still have
some tricks up my sleeve to make sure it will work. My way it could be
tested in 2007. My way would use less electricity. Did not like
trying to bring me down with Britney doll (cheap shot) Sex is one thing
science is another. I love both,but know the difference. Bert

  #7  
Old May 29th 05, 10:56 PM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bert wrote:

Gentlemen Yes lasers for heat has been kicked around, I came up with
this complete idea when Columbia U paid Russia for their tokamak,and
knew it was not good engineering Still I had my own idea(still do) how
the pellet should be structured.Figured out the lapse time between
pulses.How it would be very safe in its transfer of heat. Even figured
out its cost(in billions) and because of the cost if you remember my
posts I mentioned Gates. To say it was all my idea the answer is no.
To
say I spent more time than anyone on this I( say maybe. I still have
some tricks up my sleeve to make sure it will work. My way it could be
tested in 2007. My way would use less electricity.


Double-A writes:

What all this brings up is how little progress has been made on this
idea in the last 25 years. I hope that your ideas or somebody's will
lead to a needed breakthrough soon.


Bert wrote:

Did not like
trying to bring me down with Britney doll (cheap shot) Sex is one
thing
science is another.


Double-A writes:

Shame on you, nightbat. How could you!


Bert Wrote:

I love both,but know the difference. Bert



Of course!

Double-A

  #8  
Old June 6th 05, 12:29 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Double-A The Sun has continuos fusion at its core. How big the Suns
central core I have no idea, I do know just about all the photons
leaving the core are gamma. At this time man can only create fusion as
a single explosion,and hence very small mini explosions housed in a very
large container to capture the heat is the only way to go. Best
thinking is the huge container is under ground. If domed in glass its
blinking radiation would reach to every corner of our solar system.
(easily seen) Its interesting gravity controls the Sun's fusion,and I
use gravity to control my pulse fusion. Once you get more
energy(heat) than the energy needed to fire the lasers than the process
is self contained and continuos as long as you absorb the heat(no build
up of heat) I relate this to a disk that is spinning on top of an EM
field,and the current makes a continuos loop without pumping in more
electricity. Its not the best analogy but it does show continuos motion
without adding an outside force. Bert

  #9  
Old June 9th 05, 11:48 AM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A fast definition on how my "pulse fusion" works Implosions perfectly
timed. Bert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What are Quasars made of? Paul Hollister Astronomy Misc 17 March 9th 05 04:42 AM
Planet_X: Our 10th Planet Rudolph_X Astronomy Misc 841 May 16th 04 05:00 PM
How does the Tokamak work? Charles Cagle Amateur Astronomy 2 September 11th 03 09:46 PM
N by M Body Fusion Charles Cagle Astronomy Misc 0 August 31st 03 11:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.