A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 3rd 11, 06:15 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
Damien Valentine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

On Oct 1, 6:11*pm, Brian Davis wrote:
If the jovian is spiraling in, why isn't the terrestrial? That might
be an important constraint.


I was hoping a brown-dwarf encounter could affect one and not the
other. Since it's going to take place in a fictional context, I can
always call in Sufficiently Advanced Aliens if the brown dwarf
wouldn't pan out.
  #12  
Old October 3rd 11, 06:16 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
Damien Valentine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

On Oct 1, 9:43*pm, Andrew Plotkin wrote:
The abstract does imply that we don't expect Earthlike planets
to form at all in such systems, so the original question seems
unlikely.)


I'm sorry I was unclear here. The system in question gets perturbed
several billion years after planetary formation.
  #13  
Old October 3rd 11, 07:09 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
Dr J R Stockton[_131_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

In sci.space.history message a6b02556-5327-4b49-b104-941be44e6f32@j19g2
000vbn.googlegroups.com, Sat, 1 Oct 2011 19:08:13, Brian Davis
posted:

On Oct 1, 8:58*pm, Orval Fairbairn wrote:

All orbits are conics...


Well... not quite. Orbits are conics if the are generated in a
universe with only two objects, both of which are point-like, under
the influence of only one force, which varies as one over the distance

^ central
squared. Add other objects, non-point-like objects, other forces, or
forces that don't have a 1/r^2 dependance, and orbits are no longer
simply conics.


That is, slightly, too restrictive.

--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms and links;
Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc.
  #14  
Old October 3rd 11, 07:18 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
Andrew Plotkin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

In rec.arts.sf.science, Damien Valentine wrote:
On Oct 1, 9:43*pm, Andrew Plotkin wrote:
The abstract does imply that we don't expect Earthlike planets
to form at all in such systems, so the original question seems
unlikely.)


I'm sorry I was unclear here. The system in question gets perturbed
several billion years after planetary formation.


Hm. Spirals and slow migration are hard to arrange, then.

I don't know if anybody's done a simulation of a close approach
between a dwarf star and a planetary system. I can imagine a slow
increase in influence leading to chaotic behavior, but not to jovian
planets moving inward in a steady manner.

--Z

--
"And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
*
  #15  
Old October 3rd 11, 11:10 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

In article
,
Damien Valentine wrote:

On Oct 1, 9:43*pm, Andrew Plotkin wrote:
The abstract does imply that we don't expect Earthlike planets
to form at all in such systems, so the original question seems
unlikely.)


I'm sorry I was unclear here. The system in question gets perturbed
several billion years after planetary formation.


What perturbs it? The close approach of a rogue star?
  #16  
Old October 4th 11, 04:08 AM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,089
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

On 10/03/2011 12:14 PM, Damien Valentine wrote:
On Oct 1, 4:53 pm, "Jorge R. wrote:
Assuming the Jovian is *slowly* spiraling toward the star...


I'm assuming it takes around a million years, plus or minus an order
of magnitude. Your call whether that counts as "slow".



Close enough. And mind you, I'm not commenting on the plausibility of
your scenario - just describing how the scenario would play out if one
accepts the premise that it's possible.
  #17  
Old October 4th 11, 11:40 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
Damien Valentine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

On Oct 3, 10:08*pm, "Jorge R. Frank" wrote:
On 10/03/2011 12:14 PM, Damien Valentine wrote:

On Oct 1, 4:53 pm, "Jorge R. *wrote:
Assuming the Jovian is *slowly* spiraling toward the star...


I'm assuming it takes around a million years, plus or minus an order
of magnitude. *Your call whether that counts as "slow".


Close enough. And mind you, I'm not commenting on the plausibility of
your scenario - just describing how the scenario would play out if one
accepts the premise that it's possible.


Of course.
  #18  
Old October 7th 11, 12:14 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
GordonD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 151
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article
,
Damien Valentine wrote:

All right, this is probably a simple question, but I haven't got the
maths even to know where to start. A planet somewhere between Saturn-
and Jupiter-mass is spiraling inward, on its way to becoming a hot
jovian. There's a roughly Earth-mass planet in its way. Which is
more likely: that the rocky planet impacts the jovian head-on, that
orbital decay makes it fall into its star, or that it's expelled from
the system?

Feel free to forward this to any other Usenet group that might help.


What would cause such a "spiraling?" If one planet is spiraling in, then
how is the disturbance that caused the spiraling limited to that planet?

All orbits are conics -- whether hyperbolas (exo-Solar origin),
parabolas (indefinite origin), ellipses (Solar capture) or cirles
(ellipses with zero eccentricity). Unless the planet is shedding energy
in a retrograde direction, (exercising propulsion), its orbit is never a
spiral.



Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle wrote a story in which a space hero's coffin
is dropped into the sun, by launching it from the linear accelerator on the
Moon, fired retrograde with precisely enough velocity to counteract the
Earth's orbital speed. Though a reporter describes the path of the coffin as
"a final spiral into the sun" the narrator states that there's no such
thing.

"The Earth went on and the coffin stayed behind, then it started to fall
into the Sun...ninety-three million miles just like a falling safe".
--
Gordon Davie
Edinburgh, Scotland

"Slipped the surly bonds of Earth...to touch the face of God."

  #19  
Old October 7th 11, 05:40 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

In article ,
"GordonD" wrote:

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article
,
Damien Valentine wrote:

All right, this is probably a simple question, but I haven't got the
maths even to know where to start. A planet somewhere between Saturn-
and Jupiter-mass is spiraling inward, on its way to becoming a hot
jovian. There's a roughly Earth-mass planet in its way. Which is
more likely: that the rocky planet impacts the jovian head-on, that
orbital decay makes it fall into its star, or that it's expelled from
the system?

Feel free to forward this to any other Usenet group that might help.


What would cause such a "spiraling?" If one planet is spiraling in, then
how is the disturbance that caused the spiraling limited to that planet?

All orbits are conics -- whether hyperbolas (exo-Solar origin),
parabolas (indefinite origin), ellipses (Solar capture) or cirles
(ellipses with zero eccentricity). Unless the planet is shedding energy
in a retrograde direction, (exercising propulsion), its orbit is never a
spiral.



Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle wrote a story in which a space hero's coffin
is dropped into the sun, by launching it from the linear accelerator on the
Moon, fired retrograde with precisely enough velocity to counteract the
Earth's orbital speed. Though a reporter describes the path of the coffin as
"a final spiral into the sun" the narrator states that there's no such
thing.

"The Earth went on and the coffin stayed behind, then it started to fall
into the Sun...ninety-three million miles just like a falling safe".


The delta-V required is on the order of 98000 ft/sec. -- a pretty tall
order!
  #20  
Old October 7th 11, 05:50 PM posted to sci.space.history,rec.arts.sf.science
GordonD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 151
Default In which Your Hero fails at orbital mechanics

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article ,
"GordonD" wrote:

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article
,
Damien Valentine wrote:

All right, this is probably a simple question, but I haven't got the
maths even to know where to start. A planet somewhere between Saturn-
and Jupiter-mass is spiraling inward, on its way to becoming a hot
jovian. There's a roughly Earth-mass planet in its way. Which is
more likely: that the rocky planet impacts the jovian head-on, that
orbital decay makes it fall into its star, or that it's expelled from
the system?

Feel free to forward this to any other Usenet group that might help.

What would cause such a "spiraling?" If one planet is spiraling in,
then
how is the disturbance that caused the spiraling limited to that
planet?

All orbits are conics -- whether hyperbolas (exo-Solar origin),
parabolas (indefinite origin), ellipses (Solar capture) or cirles
(ellipses with zero eccentricity). Unless the planet is shedding energy
in a retrograde direction, (exercising propulsion), its orbit is never
a
spiral.



Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle wrote a story in which a space hero's
coffin
is dropped into the sun, by launching it from the linear accelerator on
the
Moon, fired retrograde with precisely enough velocity to counteract the
Earth's orbital speed. Though a reporter describes the path of the coffin
as
"a final spiral into the sun" the narrator states that there's no such
thing.

"The Earth went on and the coffin stayed behind, then it started to fall
into the Sun...ninety-three million miles just like a falling safe".


The delta-V required is on the order of 98000 ft/sec. -- a pretty tall
order!



The figure quoted in the story is eighteen miles a second, which is a little
over 95,000 ft/sec so presumable they were rounding off.
--
Gordon Davie
Edinburgh, Scotland

"Slipped the surly bonds of Earth...to touch the face of God."

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ORBITAL MECHANICS [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 August 30th 08 07:22 PM
ORBITAL MECHANICS ACE Astronomy Misc 0 April 16th 08 05:08 PM
Orbital Mechanics JOE HECHT Space Shuttle 7 July 21st 04 09:27 PM
ORBITAL MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 Astronomy Misc 2 January 6th 04 08:25 PM
Orbital Mechanics Dr John Stockton UK Astronomy 9 December 6th 03 09:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.