|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity
called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps The abstract for this paper is as follows: A new physical model of our universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated. Model Mechanics posits that a structured and elastic medium called the E-Matrix occupies all of pure space. The S-Particles are the only mass bearing fundamental particles that exist in our universe. The different absolute motions of the S-Particles in the E- Matrix give rise to all the different basic particles such as the electron and quarks. Also the different absolute motions of the S- Particles or S-Particle systems give rise to all the processes and interactions in our universe. Specifically Model Mechanics gives rise to a new theory of gravity called DTG and a new theory of relativity called IRT. DTG in combination with IRT provides physical solutions to the following problematic observations of the current theories: 1.The accelerated expansion of the far reached regions of our universe; 2. Dark Energy; 3. Dark Matter; 4.The horizon problem; 5.The galactic rotational curve problem; 6. The Pioneer 10 does not follow the predicted path of the current theories. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity(DTG)
On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote:
A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. On the other hand, you have yet to demonstrate that IRT can make any predictions at all. For example, I have ask you to use IRT to calculate the time dilation of an earth satellite clock in a circular earth orbit (eccentricity = 0) at an altitude of 212 km above MSL. You can do it! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:40:29 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote: A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. Einstein's theory is just a plagiarized version of LET. Seto makes a lot more sense than Einstein even if he IS just as wrong. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity(DTG)
On 3/9/11 3:49 AM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:40:29 -0600, Sam wrote: On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote: A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. Einstein's theory is just a plagiarized version of LET. Seto makes a lot more sense than Einstein even if he IS just as wrong. Ralph, how come neither you, nor Seto, can calculate the time dilation of an earth satellite clock in a circular earth orbit at an altitude of 212 km above MSL? Why is that? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
On Mar 9, 3:49*am, Hw@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:40:29 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote: A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps * I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any * observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general * relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. Einstein's theory is just a plagiarized version of LET. Seto makes a lot more sense than Einstein even if he IS just as wrong. Sense, Henri, in science is determined by agreement with experiment. There is no requirement that a model fits with your preconceived notions of how nature *should* work. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
On Mar 9, 1:49*am, Hw@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:40:29 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote: A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps * I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any * observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general * relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. Einstein's theory is just a plagiarized version of LET. Seto makes a lot more sense than Einstein even if he IS just as wrong. Yet he's stuck proffering his theories here. Just like you. Funny how that keeps happening. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:45:16 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/9/11 3:49 AM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:40:29 -0600, Sam wrote: On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote: A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. Einstein's theory is just a plagiarized version of LET. Seto makes a lot more sense than Einstein even if he IS just as wrong. Henry, how come neither you, nor Seto, can calculate the time dilation of an earth satellite clock in a circular earth orbit at an altitude of 212 km above MSL? Why is that? I just did the equivalent..... For GPS orbits....but there is no 'time dilation'....for which you have no definition anyway. http://www.scisite.info/fallinglight.txt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:46:13 -0800 (PST), PD wrote:
On Mar 9, 3:49*am, Hw@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:40:29 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote: A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps * I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any * observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general * relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. Einstein's theory is just a plagiarized version of LET. Seto makes a lot more sense than Einstein even if he IS just as wrong. Sense, Henri, in science is determined by agreement with experiment. Correct. That's how big chief Androcles and I proved that light is ballistic. There is no requirement that a model fits with your preconceived notions of how nature *should* work. Nature apparently works just as I say. http://www.scisite.info/The_new_ball..._of_light.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
On Mar 10, 3:52*pm, Hw@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:46:13 -0800 (PST), PD wrote: On Mar 9, 3:49 am, Hw@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:40:29 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote: A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. Einstein's theory is just a plagiarized version of LET. Seto makes a lot more sense than Einstein even if he IS just as wrong. Sense, Henri, in science is determined by agreement with experiment. Correct. That's how big chief Androcles and I proved that light is ballistic. ALL experiment, Ralph, not cherry-picked ones. There is no requirement that a model fits with your preconceived notions of how nature *should* work. Nature apparently works just as I say. Apparent to you, obviously. But then again, you are pretty selective about what you want to have appear in front of you. http://www.scisite.info/The_new_ball..._of_light.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) and Doppler Theory of Gravity(DTG)
On 3/10/11 3:49 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:45:16 -0600, Sam wrote: On 3/9/11 3:49 AM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:40:29 -0600, Sam wrote: On 3/6/11 10:06 AM, kenseto wrote: A new theory of relativity called IRT and a new theory of gravity called DTG is available in the following link: http://www.modelmechanics.org/2011irt.dtg.xps I hate to burst your bubble, Seto, but there has not been any observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general relativity. They remain fruitful tools of physics. Einstein's theory is just a plagiarized version of LET. Seto makes a lot more sense than Einstein even if he IS just as wrong. Henry, how come neither you, nor Seto, can calculate the time dilation of an earth satellite clock in a circular earth orbit at an altitude of 212 km above MSL? Why is that? I just did the equivalent..... For GPS orbits....but there is no 'time dilation'....for which you have no definition anyway. http://www.scisite.info/fallinglight.txt Your "A falling photon increases speed by 0.1598 m/s" is bull****. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Improved Relativity Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity | kenseto[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | February 12th 08 12:48 AM |
Improved Relativity Theory and Doppler Theory of Gravity | kenseto[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 38 | October 23rd 07 11:07 PM |
#17 Replacing General Relativity by Dirac's Sea of Positrons; Does Cosmos have two Spaces?; new book: Growing-Solar-System theory via Dirac New-Radioactivity replaces Nebular-Dust-Cloud theory | a_plutonium[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 4 | September 18th 07 12:31 PM |
IRT: Improved Relativity Theory | kenseto | Astronomy Misc | 3 | May 30th 05 02:42 AM |
A Question For Those Who Truly Understand The Theory of Relativity (Was: Einstein's GR as a Gauge Theory and Shipov's Torsion Field) | Larry Hammick | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 26th 05 02:22 AM |