A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES RELATIVITY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5th 14, 11:39 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES RELATIVITY

According to Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), if the light source starts moving towards the receiver, its motion decreases the distances between subsequent pulses. As a result, the speed of the pulses relative to the receiver remains unchanged. In contrast, if the receiver start moving towards the source, "the distances between subsequent pulses are not affected" - accordingly, the speed of the light pulses relative to the receiver changes (in violation of special relativity):

http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler

Einstein's relativity cannot be saved but the principle of relativity can be restored by assuming that the motion of the light source, like the motion of the receiver, does not affect the distances between subsequent pulses.

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old August 6th 14, 08:27 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES RELATIVITY

http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...t_white_dwarfs
Albert Einstein Institute: "One of the three classical tests for general relativity is the gravitational redshift of light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. However, in contrast to the other two tests - the gravitational deflection of light and the relativistic perihelion shift -, you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. (...) The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..."

That is, the Pound-Rebka experiment is compatible with the prediction of Newton's emission theory of light that, in a gravitational field, the speed of falling photons varies like the speed of ordinary falling objects. If the top of a tower of height h emits photons, an observer on the ground will measure their speed to be:

c' = c(1 + gh/c^2) (according to the emission theory)

and their frequency to be:

f' = f(1 + gh/c^2) (confirmed by Pound and Rebka)

where c and f are the initial speed and frequency (as measured by the emitter).

Accordingly, the Pound-Rebka experiment is incompatible with the prediction of Einstein's general relativity that, in a gravitational field, the speed of falling photons varies twice as fast as the speed of ordinary falling objects:

c' = c(1 + 2gh/c^2)

The factor 2 on the potential term makes this prediction incompatible with the frequency shift measured in the Pound-Rebka experiment.

Conclusion: Actually the Pound-Rebka experiment confirmed Newton's emission theory of light and refuted Einstein's relativity.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DOPPLER REFUTES EINSTEIN, CONFIRMS NEWTON Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 October 28th 13 08:03 AM
GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT REFUTES EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 May 2nd 13 07:28 AM
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES ALBERT EINSTEIN Tonico Astronomy Misc 0 April 1st 12 01:21 PM
DOPPLER EFFECT REFUTES SPECIAL RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 7 December 30th 11 11:08 AM
PERIMETER INSTITUTE AGAINST DIVINE ALBERT Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 June 30th 08 03:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.