revisiting Apollo

You must the biggest moron I ever met. You said I refused to provide
evidence. When I pointed out to you that the evidence is in the
documentary, you continue to spout "no evidence'. You sound like the
church when they refused to even look through Galileo's telescope you
know that?

Again watch the documentary and then make your stupid ass comments.

Paul Lawler wrote:

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...

Holy ****..watch the damn video and then make your dumb arse comments ok.


The fact that you worship **** does not exempt you from your burden to
provide (credible) evidence for your claims. And no, holding up as evidence
a vido that you know we do not have access to does NOT constitute credible
evidence.

Yoda, I believe the documentary you saw was a fake. I believe this for
two reasons:

1) The CBC website says it was a fake, it even calls it a
"mockumentary".

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html
http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...n/winners.html

2) I have seen no other evidence which supports the view that the
landings were real but the footage was faked by Kubrick et al.

In order to convince anyone that what you say is true you must
explain:

1) Why the CBC website says the documentary is a fake.

2) Why there is no other evidence for this version of events.


Tim
--
My last .sig was rubbish too.

Yoda, I believe the documentary you saw was a fake. I believe this for
two reasons:

1) The CBC website says it was a fake, it even calls it a
"mockumentary".

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html
http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...n/winners.html

2) I have seen no other evidence which supports the view that the
landings were real but the footage was faked by Kubrick et al.

In order to convince anyone that what you say is true you must
explain:

1) Why the CBC website says the documentary is a fake.

2) Why there is no other evidence for this version of events.


Tim
--
My last .sig was rubbish too.

I already explained this. You state that it is a mockumentary. Well in
that case...it is only mocking those who say there was no hoaxed footage.

Tim Auton wrote:

Yoda, I believe the documentary you saw was a fake. I believe this for
two reasons:

1) The CBC website says it was a fake, it even calls it a
"mockumentary".

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html
http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...n/winners.html

2) I have seen no other evidence which supports the view that the
landings were real but the footage was faked by Kubrick et al.

In order to convince anyone that what you say is true you must
explain:

1) Why the CBC website says the documentary is a fake.

2) Why there is no other evidence for this version of events.


Tim

I already explained this. You state that it is a mockumentary. Well in
that case...it is only mocking those who say there was no hoaxed footage.

Tim Auton wrote:

Yoda, I believe the documentary you saw was a fake. I believe this for
two reasons:

1) The CBC website says it was a fake, it even calls it a
"mockumentary".

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html
http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...n/winners.html

2) I have seen no other evidence which supports the view that the
landings were real but the footage was faked by Kubrick et al.

In order to convince anyone that what you say is true you must
explain:

1) Why the CBC website says the documentary is a fake.

2) Why there is no other evidence for this version of events.


Tim

"Yoda" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...
I already answered this to someone else. That is it isnt it? Sun
glare..sun glare...**** man if sun glare blocked out the stars...there
would be no such thing as astronomy during moon lit nights - period!

And there isn't... try taking a picture of the moon and stars during a
moonlit night at a shutter speed fast enough to avoid overexposing the moon.
Guess what? No stars. But please... don't take my word for it. Try it for
yourself.

"Yoda" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...
I already answered this to someone else. That is it isnt it? Sun
glare..sun glare...**** man if sun glare blocked out the stars...there
would be no such thing as astronomy during moon lit nights - period!

And there isn't... try taking a picture of the moon and stars during a
moonlit night at a shutter speed fast enough to avoid overexposing the moon.
Guess what? No stars. But please... don't take my word for it. Try it for
yourself.

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...
You must the biggest moron I ever met. You said I refused to provide
evidence. When I pointed out to you that the evidence is in the
documentary, you continue to spout "no evidence'. You sound like the
church when they refused to even look through Galileo's telescope you
know that?

Again watch the documentary and then make your stupid ass comments.

Considering we have never met, that's another unsubstantiated claim on your
part, isn't it? Clearly unless you provide the documentary I cannot watch
it, now can I, so your continued admonition to "look it up yourself" carries
no more weight now than it did the first 10 times you made it.

"Yoda" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...
You must the biggest moron I ever met. You said I refused to provide
evidence. When I pointed out to you that the evidence is in the
documentary, you continue to spout "no evidence'. You sound like the
church when they refused to even look through Galileo's telescope you
know that?

Again watch the documentary and then make your stupid ass comments.

Considering we have never met, that's another unsubstantiated claim on your
part, isn't it? Clearly unless you provide the documentary I cannot watch
it, now can I, so your continued admonition to "look it up yourself" carries
no more weight now than it did the first 10 times you made it.

Tim Auton tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY] wrote:
Yoda wrote:
[snip]
The US government openly admitted recently that the moon pictures were
hoaxed on the direct order of President Nixon.
[snip]
Anyhow the Moon Hoax pictures and video documentary which proves this is
fact was shown on CBC and made by CBC.

I presume you meant this documentary:

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html

"This is no ordinary documentary. Its intent is to inform and
entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up - make him aware that
one should always view television with a critical eye."

I've been digging on the web a bit more. It seems the best search
results can be found by searching for '"William Karel" moon' (without
the 's but with the "s). William Karel is the documentary
(mockumentary!) maker behind this hoax.

My French is a little rusty, but I could pretty much follow this
interview with Karel about the film (at least I presume this was the
same film, certainly the same subject matter and filmmaker and the
interview is on the film producers' website). It's called Operation
Lune here, but I presume it was also translated to English and renamed
"Dark Side of the Moon".

http://www.arte-tv.com/fr/histoire-s...el/385476.html

Given the weight of evidence available on the net from diverse sources
claiming this film is a hoax and the complete lack of any other
evidence supporting its point of view, I would suggest the case is
closed. This was a hoax and Yoda has been well and truly hoaxed. I
know we all suspected that from the start, but it's nice to have some
evidence.

Now, Yoda, do you have any more evidence for me to refute? This crazy
theory was rather amusing to explore. Karel may have failed in his
attempt to educate you to be more critical in your viewing, but at
least he gave the rest of us a good laugh at your expense.


Tim
--
My last .sig was rubbish too.