|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
logical math followup
This post is a reply to a previous thread that has become to old to
respond to. Due to lack of capability to access the internet, I was unable to reply when the thread was current. This post is also a reply to both posts that were made after I was unable to reply. Start reply: I will try to explain this in a way that even those that were brainwashed into believing in magic can understand. The exponentiation factor represents the number of times that a number is multiplied or divided by itself. Multiplication represented by a number and often referred to as raised to whatever power that coincides with said number. Division represented by a number preceded by a minus sign and often referred to as lowered to the power that coincides with said number. Which in turn means that when the exponentiation factor is represented by the number one then the number being raised to the first power is multiplied by itself once. Hence 2 (raised to) the first power is = 2 multiplied by itself once = 4, 6 (raised to) the first power = 6 multiplied by itself once = 36, 10 (raised to) the first power = 10 multiplied by itself once = 100. In turn this also means that when the exponentiation factor is represented by a 1 preceded with a minus sign (-1) that the number is divided by itself once. Hence 2 (lowered to) the first power (-1) = 2 divided by itself once = 1, 7 (lowered to) the first power (-1) = 7 divided by itself once = 1, etc. All numbers when divided by themselves once are equal to one. This is how real math works. Your equation is false as applied to exponentiation. Reciprocation applies to standard multiplication and division yes. It does not however apply to exponentiation. Meaning that yes, if you multiply a number by 10 the result will be ten times the original number and reciprocally if you divide a number by 10 the result will be one-tenth the original number. That also applies to numbers other than 10. Death to psychotronic weaponry. Religion is fraud. Pseudoscience is as bad as religion. James M. Vierling Jr. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"vonroach" wrote in message
... On 19 Aug 2004 11:28:33 -0700, (James M. Vierling Jr.) wrote: Which in turn means that when the exponentiation factor is represented by the number one then the number being raised to the first power is multiplied by itself once. Hence 2 (raised to) the first power is = 2 What is 2^0? Zero does not exist. Zero is an un-american fraud perpetrated by an Arab, to prevent fine American scientists developing a protection against Al-Quaida's psychotronic weapons, which they will unleash on the world on September 2nd. Death to zero! Ian -- ____________________ A quality online comic strip for the discerning reader. With shagging in it. http://www.jaxtrawstudios.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:06:37 +0100, "Jaxtraw"
wrote: What is 2^0? Zero does not exist. Zero is an un-american fraud perpetrated by an Arab, to prevent fine American scientists developing a protection against Al-Quaida's psychotronic weapons, which they will unleash on the world on September 2nd. Death to zero! Ian Odd, I thought 2^0 =1, 2^1 = 2, and 2^2 =4, but if what you say is a fact, then 2/0 = 2 and 2 * 0 = 2. I did get a feeling for Ground Zero on 9/11. Your concept of psychotronic weapons includes aviation fuel? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"vonroach" wrote in message
... On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:06:37 +0100, "Jaxtraw" wrote: What is 2^0? Zero does not exist. Zero is an un-american fraud perpetrated by an Arab, to prevent fine American scientists developing a protection against Al-Quaida's psychotronic weapons, which they will unleash on the world on September 2nd. Death to zero! Ian Odd, I thought 2^0 =1, 2^1 = 2, and 2^2 =4, but if what you say is a fact, then 2/0 = 2 and 2 * 0 = 2. I did get a feeling for Ground Zero on 9/11. Your concept of psychotronic weapons includes aviation fuel? The _supposed_ Japanese aircraft that _supposedly* attacked Pearl Harbour on September 11th 1941 were *Zero's!* Do you see? The psychotronic weapons made the world hallucinate the atrocity in 2001, which is really *21* since 0 is an imaginary number (it is the square root of minus 1), in which George Bush *didn't* fake an attack on the Reichstag using psychically triggered explosives which were launched from aboard Apollo 13, which never went to the moon, *just* as NASA claim it didn't. Why else do the shadows diverge? If you add up all the letters in Daniel Min, and divide by zero, _which does not exist_, you get the ratio of the natural number e to pi, multiplied by the golden section. What more proof do you need? Remember, coal is at least as old as man. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
vonroach wrote in message . ..
On 20 Aug 2004 07:55:53 -0700, (James M. Vierling Jr.) wrote: the exponentiation factor represents the number of times a number is multiplied or divided by itself. In other words ^2 means the number mulitplied by itslef twice as opposed to lowered to the second power (-2) means divided by itself twice. 2^2 or squared, usually means 2 multiplied by itself 1 time = 4. Death to psychotronic weaponry. Religion is fraud. Pseudoscience is just as bad as religion. James M. Vierling Jr. Pychotronic weaponry? Have you ever heard of the principle of `falsification'? A religious belief can not be proved wrong, therefore it is not a subject for scientific study. Psudoscience? `Science' can only be wrong or right. Perhaps you have lies and sophistry in mind? And here I thought that it was proved wrong that the sun revolved around the earth. Just one of so many religious beliefs that have been proved wrong. Pseudoscience refers to fake or made up scientific claims that are pushed as real. E=mc^2 as an example. Just for the record all religious beliefs can be proved wrong or false. There is no such thing as magic which alone wipes out everything that all religions are based in and is very easy to prove. Psychotronic weaponry refers to electromagnetic radiation weaponry in which the broadcasts are modulated to represent human brainwave pattern potentials to attack the brain of people with. Death to psychotronic weaponry. Religion is fraud. Pseudoscience is as bad as religion. James M. Vierling Jr. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
vonroach wrote in message . ..
On 19 Aug 2004 11:28:33 -0700, (James M. Vierling Jr.) wrote: Which in turn means that when the exponentiation factor is represented by the number one then the number being raised to the first power is multiplied by itself once. Hence 2 (raised to) the first power is = 2 What is 2^0? If you are going to cut up the posts please do so at a point that would not make the statement read as incorrect. To write 2^0 is the equivalent of saying 2 not raised or lowered to any power which is therefore the same as just writing 2. Death to psychotronic weaponry. Religion is fraud. Pseudoscience is as bad as religion. James M. Vierling Jr. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In message , James M.
Vierling Jr. writes vonroach wrote in message ... On 19 Aug 2004 11:28:33 -0700, (James M. Vierling Jr.) wrote: Which in turn means that when the exponentiation factor is represented by the number one then the number being raised to the first power is multiplied by itself once. Hence 2 (raised to) the first power is = 2 What is 2^0? If you are going to cut up the posts please do so at a point that would not make the statement read as incorrect. To write 2^0 is the equivalent of saying 2 not raised or lowered to any power which is therefore the same as just writing 2. "Look at my son. He's the only one marching in step". Meanwhile, the rest of us will continue as normal. And just what does this have to do with astronomy? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Bang Busted in Science Classes for High Schools | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 488 | July 18th 04 07:18 PM |
logical math | Vierlingjr | Astronomy Misc | 4 | June 21st 04 12:35 PM |
Planet_X: Our 10th Planet | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 841 | May 16th 04 05:00 PM |
How Did the Jarosite Form at Meridiani? | Sir Charles W. Shults III | Astronomy Misc | 127 | April 1st 04 03:11 PM |
Blackholes Don't Tilt | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 60 | August 19th 03 02:29 PM |