|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Take your own advice, Tom Roberts.
On 18/08/2017 10:30 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
A very dense objects, yes. TRUE black holes, no. Black Holes violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle wavelength would be extremely tiny for a black hole, way less than a Planck Length. The larger an object is, the smaller its uncertainty is. So try another principle of physics which you don't understand, maybe that one will stick? http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/uncer.html Yousuf Khan -- Sent from Giganews on Thunderbird on my Toshiba laptop |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tom Roberts and Reality. | Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway[_8_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 23rd 13 07:48 PM |
DIRK MOORTEL GLORIFIES TOM ROBERTS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | September 14th 07 03:26 PM |
THE DISCOVERY OF LEBLOND-ROBERTS-HSU | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 4th 07 06:49 AM |
Poor Tom Roberts. | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 13th 05 10:44 AM |
Poor Tom Roberts. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | October 13th 05 10:44 AM |