4th ed. Chapt 15 MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #308 ATOM TOTALITY

END
Chapter 10
Subject: thanks to Schild and Leiter (sic) who cleaned out the black-
hole nonsense in astronomy #42 ;3rd edition book: ATOM TOTALITY (Atom
Universe) THEORY

--- Quoting in parts from NEW SCIENTIST ---
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do...
Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes

The researchers found that the disc of material surrounding the
central object has a hole in it with a width of about 4000
Astronomical Units (1 AU is the distance between the Earth and the
Sun). This gap suggests that material has been swept out by magnetic
forces from the central object, the researchers say, and must
therefore be a MECO, not a black hole.
(snipped)

According to the MECO theory, objects in our universe can never
actually collapse to form black holes. When an object gets very dense
and hot, subatomic particles start popping in and out of existence
inside it in huge numbers, producing copious amounts of radiation.
Outward pressure from this radiation halts the collapse so the object
remains a hot ball of plasma rather than becoming a black hole.
(snipped)

Journal reference: The Astronomical Journal (vol 132, p 420)

--- end quoting from NEW SCIENTIST ---

The researchers were Schild and Leiter of the Harvard-Smithsonian
Center
of Astrophysics.

The term MECO is derived from "magnetospheric eternally collapsing
object"
and the physics involved is that whereever these high energy sources
in astronomy
come from, seem to have a magnetic field around them, something that a
black-hole
cannot have a magnetic field.

So the new challenge to astronomy is to examine high energy sources of
stars or galaxies and determine if they have a magnetic field via
gravitational lensing.

So, one by one, all the previous proclaimed and acclaimed black-hole
objects
are going to be swept under the rug of shame in science. Simply re-
examine
all those old proclaimed black-holes and find out their "magnetic
field".

Now the MECO theory appears to be a version of the Dirac
Radioactivities
where particles slip in and out of the Dirac Ocean of Antimatter.

You can only have a Ocean of Antimatter sitting alongside a Cosmos of
Matter in an Atom Totality theory, not a Big Bang.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies