#1
|
|||
|
|||
drift method
Can anyone explain the drift method of polar alignment
in a clear concise way? How many here actually do it? It seems to be a necessity to do long exposure deep sky photo work irregarless of fancy goto's. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
drift method
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:59:38 GMT, "sunstuff" wrote:
Can anyone explain the drift method of polar alignment in a clear concise way? How many here actually do it? It seems to be a necessity to do long exposure deep sky photo work irregarless of fancy goto's. Google "drift method" and you'll find lots of good descriptions, complete with images. Probably better than can be described here with words alone. Fair polar alignment is critical to imaging. The longer your subexposures, the closer you need to be. For the length of subexposures most imagers use, you only need to be within a degree or so of the pole, which is easy to achieve. Many do better than this with just a polar alignment scope. The drift method is only one approach. I personally prefer semiautomated methods that utilize the imaging camera itself. This includes tools like TPoint and PolarAlignMax. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
drift method
What are "subexposures"..I don't see that terminology in polar align /
astrophoto descriptions. "Chris L Peterson" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:59:38 GMT, "sunstuff" wrote: Can anyone explain the drift method of polar alignment in a clear concise way? How many here actually do it? It seems to be a necessity to do long exposure deep sky photo work irregarless of fancy goto's. Google "drift method" and you'll find lots of good descriptions, complete with images. Probably better than can be described here with words alone. Fair polar alignment is critical to imaging. The longer your subexposures, the closer you need to be. For the length of subexposures most imagers use, you only need to be within a degree or so of the pole, which is easy to achieve. Many do better than this with just a polar alignment scope. The drift method is only one approach. I personally prefer semiautomated methods that utilize the imaging camera itself. This includes tools like TPoint and PolarAlignMax. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
drift method
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:36:42 GMT, "sunstuff" wrote:
What are "subexposures"..I don't see that terminology in polar align / astrophoto descriptions. To get good images of most astronomical objects requires very long exposure times- several minutes to several hours. For a variety of reasons, it is often impractical to make such a long image in a single exposure. So it is common to break up the total exposure into subexposures, and then add these together during post processing. For example, if you need a 60-minute exposure, you might make 10 6-minute exposures and then stack them all together into a single frame when you are done. The problem with poor polar alignment is that stars appear to rotate around some common point in (or off of) and image. The longer you expose, the greater the rotation (which causes streaked stars). If your subexposures are short compared with the rotation rate, you can rotate and align the individual images when you stack them, and the rotation will not be apparent. If you use longer subexposures, however, you need better polar alignment in order to reduce the rotation. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
drift method
What ISO setting is good for say 8th magnitude and higher on a DSLR. 800 ?
"Chris L Peterson" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:36:42 GMT, "sunstuff" wrote: What are "subexposures"..I don't see that terminology in polar align / astrophoto descriptions. To get good images of most astronomical objects requires very long exposure times- several minutes to several hours. For a variety of reasons, it is often impractical to make such a long image in a single exposure. So it is common to break up the total exposure into subexposures, and then add these together during post processing. For example, if you need a 60-minute exposure, you might make 10 6-minute exposures and then stack them all together into a single frame when you are done. The problem with poor polar alignment is that stars appear to rotate around some common point in (or off of) and image. The longer you expose, the greater the rotation (which causes streaked stars). If your subexposures are short compared with the rotation rate, you can rotate and align the individual images when you stack them, and the rotation will not be apparent. If you use longer subexposures, however, you need better polar alignment in order to reduce the rotation. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
drift method
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:24:50 GMT, "6EQUJ5" wrote:
What ISO setting is good for say 8th magnitude and higher on a DSLR. 800 ? It depends on the camera. Most DSLRs have their lowest noise between ISO 200 and 400. For most targets, there will be no advantage to going faster- the images will appear brighter, but the S/N will be worse. When I use a Canon DSLR I normally shoot DSOs at ISO 400. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
drift method
"6EQUJ5" wrote in news:ml_gn.66566$Db2.54614@edtnps83:
What ISO setting is good for say 8th magnitude and higher on a DSLR. 800 ? http://www.astropix.com/HTML/I_ASTROP/TOC_AP.HTM http://www.astropix.com/HTML/I_ASTROP/TRACKED/POLAR.HTM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LX200 Drift Scan method | Matthew D. Mills | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | January 11th 05 01:56 AM |
LX200 drift scan method | Matthew D. Mills | UK Astronomy | 0 | January 11th 05 12:10 AM |
LX200 Drift Scan method | Matthew D. Mills | CCD Imaging | 0 | January 10th 05 11:57 PM |
drift Alignment and CG-5 | Toma | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | December 8th 03 09:57 PM |
Drift alignment on SCT..need help | Rod Mollise | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 25th 03 02:19 AM |