|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
Tom Gardner wrote:
On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. -- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong." -- Thomas Jefferson |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
On 14/11/16 09:55, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. Firstly, they are extremely advanced airplanes: commercial airliners often take /decades/ to catch up with the technology used in gliders, e.g. composites, wingtips, and lightning strike protection. Secondly, neither winches nor tugs will take a glider up to 10k/20k/30k/ft (40k/50kft in rare cases!) - and can't even get there on their own! It is unusual for a tug to take a glider above 3kft over here; 2kft is the normal release height. Finally, you have too little imagination about how to launch a glider. Gravity, bungees, and (in true Fred Flintstone style) horses are also used. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=la3rb9LfG0Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxbdXqEvxE0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86rOfjhsIIM Now, what was that about "up there" and "without an engine"? |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
On 14/11/16 11:02, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says... Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. True. Whether it is a tow plane (like seems common in the US), a motor on a winch for a cable launch (common in Europe, or so I'm told), or even "self tow" (engine or motor and propeller on the glider) a glider would have a hard time getting off the ground without some sort of engine/motor. False. See my other reply for videos of examples. (But in Europe winches are more common than tugs, and a typical release height is 2kft, but higher is possible. A normal tug release height is 2kft, sometimes 3kft) And before anyone mentions that a glider can stay aloft pretty much "all day" by riding thermals, yes it can. But, if you're spending all day searching for the best thermals, you're not spending any time going from point A to point B, so they're not terribly useful as transportation. True, but they are a damn sight more fun (Besides, ISTR sailing ships seem to have been used for transportation, even though they were sometimes becalmed ) |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
Tom Gardner wrote:
On 14/11/16 09:55, Fred J. McCall wrote: Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. Firstly, they are extremely advanced airplanes: Nope. No engine means they aren't an airplane. An airplane is a fixed wing heavier than air powered vehicle. Secondly, neither winches nor tugs will take a glider up to 10k/20k/30k/ft (40k/50kft in rare cases!) - and can't even get there on their own! It is unusual for a tug to take a glider above 3kft over here; 2kft is the normal release height. So? Finally, you have too little imagination about how to launch a glider. Gravity, bungees, and (in true Fred Flintstone style) horses are also used. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=la3rb9LfG0Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxbdXqEvxE0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86rOfjhsIIM Now, what was that about "up there" and "without an engine"? Yes, you can build a glider, move it to the launch site by ox cart, and throw it off a cliff. You can lift it with balloons. You can even try farting magic pixie dust on them. But that's not how they're usually transported and launched. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
Tom Gardner wrote:
On 14/11/16 11:02, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. True. Whether it is a tow plane (like seems common in the US), a motor on a winch for a cable launch (common in Europe, or so I'm told), or even "self tow" (engine or motor and propeller on the glider) a glider would have a hard time getting off the ground without some sort of engine/motor. False. See my other reply for videos of examples. (But in Europe winches are more common than tugs, and a typical release height is 2kft, but higher is possible. A normal tug release height is 2kft, sometimes 3kft) And before anyone mentions that a glider can stay aloft pretty much "all day" by riding thermals, yes it can. But, if you're spending all day searching for the best thermals, you're not spending any time going from point A to point B, so they're not terribly useful as transportation. True, but they are a damn sight more fun (Besides, ISTR sailing ships seem to have been used for transportation, even though they were sometimes becalmed ) 'Becalmed in a glider means you land. Then you have to figure out how to get it back up in the air again. And you'd better have places to land all along the way. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
On 14/11/16 12:54, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 11:02, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. True. Whether it is a tow plane (like seems common in the US), a motor on a winch for a cable launch (common in Europe, or so I'm told), or even "self tow" (engine or motor and propeller on the glider) a glider would have a hard time getting off the ground without some sort of engine/motor. False. See my other reply for videos of examples. (But in Europe winches are more common than tugs, and a typical release height is 2kft, but higher is possible. A normal tug release height is 2kft, sometimes 3kft) And before anyone mentions that a glider can stay aloft pretty much "all day" by riding thermals, yes it can. But, if you're spending all day searching for the best thermals, you're not spending any time going from point A to point B, so they're not terribly useful as transportation. True, but they are a damn sight more fun (Besides, ISTR sailing ships seem to have been used for transportation, even though they were sometimes becalmed ) 'Becalmed in a glider means you land. Then you have to figure out how to get it back up in the air again. And you'd better have places to land all along the way. Standard operating procedu pick a field, pluck off the wings, put glider in trailer, go home. Also many gliders have "get out of trouble" engines, but they expect not to use them. But the point is not whether gliders are practical means of transport (they aren't), but whether you need engines to go up. (You don't - unless you count the sun as an engine ) |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
On 14/11/16 12:52, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 09:55, Fred J. McCall wrote: Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. Firstly, they are extremely advanced airplanes: Nope. No engine means they aren't an airplane. An airplane is a fixed wing heavier than air powered vehicle. That might be /your/ definition, but it is only valid in a Tweedledum-and-Tweedledee sense. If you want to converse with other people, it helps to use words in a standard way. The first google result gives: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/airplane airplane noun 1. a heavier-than-air aircraft kept aloft by the upward thrust exerted by the passing air on its fixed wings and driven by propellers, jet propulsion, etc. 2. any similar heavier-than-air aircraft, as a glider or helicopter. Secondly, neither winches nor tugs will take a glider up to 10k/20k/30k/ft (40k/50kft in rare cases!) - and can't even get there on their own! It is unusual for a tug to take a glider above 3kft over here; 2kft is the normal release height. So? It disproves your contention that aircraft need engines to go up. Finally, you have too little imagination about how to launch a glider. Gravity, bungees, and (in true Fred Flintstone style) horses are also used. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=la3rb9LfG0Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxbdXqEvxE0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86rOfjhsIIM Now, what was that about "up there" and "without an engine"? Yes, you can build a glider, move it to the launch site by ox cart, and throw it off a cliff. You can lift it with balloons. You can even try farting magic pixie dust on them. But that's not how they're usually transported and launched. True, and balloons have been used, but I'm skeptical about pixie dust. But those are separate points not related to whether you need engines to go up. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
In article ,
says... On 14/11/16 11:02, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. True. Whether it is a tow plane (like seems common in the US), a motor on a winch for a cable launch (common in Europe, or so I'm told), or even "self tow" (engine or motor and propeller on the glider) a glider would have a hard time getting off the ground without some sort of engine/motor. False. See my other reply for videos of examples. "Gravity, bungees, and (in true Fred Flintstone style) horses are also used." In other words a bio-mechanical engine and to examples of converting potential energy to kinetic energy. So, a glider still can't be launched without inputting some sort of energy which comes from somewhere. I suppose a large headwind might suffice, if you like taking off backwards with respect to the ground. (But in Europe winches are more common than tugs, and a typical release height is 2kft, but higher is possible. A normal tug release height is 2kft, sometimes 3kft) And before anyone mentions that a glider can stay aloft pretty much "all day" by riding thermals, yes it can. But, if you're spending all day searching for the best thermals, you're not spending any time going from point A to point B, so they're not terribly useful as transportation. True, but they are a damn sight more fun (Besides, ISTR sailing ships seem to have been used for transportation, even though they were sometimes becalmed ) Fun is not a practical transportation device. It's awfully hard to get a glider to fly arbitrary routes thousands of miles long. It's trivial with a jet airliner. Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Ion drive for aircraft imminent.
On 14/11/16 18:37, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says... On 14/11/16 11:02, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... Tom Gardner wrote: On 14/11/16 02:21, Fred J. McCall wrote: wrote: Aircraft engines don't lift anything. Of course they do. It's that whole Lift/Drag thing. Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up. Except when they do, and that can be higher than commercial airliners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight...record#Gliders Gliders aren't airplanes and they don't get up there without something with an engine. True. Whether it is a tow plane (like seems common in the US), a motor on a winch for a cable launch (common in Europe, or so I'm told), or even "self tow" (engine or motor and propeller on the glider) a glider would have a hard time getting off the ground without some sort of engine/motor. False. See my other reply for videos of examples. "Gravity, bungees, and (in true Fred Flintstone style) horses are also used." In other words a bio-mechanical engine and to examples of converting potential energy to kinetic energy. So, a glider still can't be launched without inputting some sort of energy which comes from somewhere. I suppose a large headwind might suffice, if you like taking off backwards with respect to the ground. (But in Europe winches are more common than tugs, and a typical release height is 2kft, but higher is possible. A normal tug release height is 2kft, sometimes 3kft) And before anyone mentions that a glider can stay aloft pretty much "all day" by riding thermals, yes it can. But, if you're spending all day searching for the best thermals, you're not spending any time going from point A to point B, so they're not terribly useful as transportation. True, but they are a damn sight more fun (Besides, ISTR sailing ships seem to have been used for transportation, even though they were sometimes becalmed ) Fun is not a practical transportation device. It's awfully hard to get a glider to fly arbitrary routes thousands of miles long. It's trivial with a jet airliner. Sure, but what does that have to do with the original point, viz "Remove the engines and airplanes don't go up." The can, and do, go up - occasionally higher than commercial airliners other than Concorde. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New computer technology imminent. | Jeff Findley[_6_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 24th 15 03:33 PM |
Armageddon Imminent: Fundies Don't Get It (but they will) | Anonymous Remailer | Astronomy Misc | 8 | April 10th 08 07:14 PM |
Armageddon Imminent: Fundies Don't Get It (but they will) | Anonymous Remailer | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | April 10th 08 07:14 PM |
Lunar Eclipse Imminent! | Double-A[_1_] | Misc | 8 | September 12th 07 10:04 AM |
Is a local supernova imminent? | Imperishable Stars | Misc | 7 | October 6th 04 12:40 AM |