HOW COOL IS THIS?

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:11:38 AM UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 8:49:21 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 10:25:16 PM UTC-4, palsing wrote:

Must you always have a bone to pick with virtually every offering here?

This is a forum for discussion, is it not?

That's my whole point, you loser!

So far all you've done is argue and cast insults.

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:09:41 AM UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:06:14 PM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 19:25:14 -0700 (PDT), palsing
wrote:

You had better be sure exactly what it is you are trying to demonstrate at your so-called "outreach."

Must you always have a bone to pick with virtually every offering here? This is a portrait of the Earth and moon from a million miles way, perhaps a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence for you and me and the rest of the world.

He's a piece of human dog****. What do you expect?

I expect him to learn from his errors... but obviously I'm wrong...

What errors in this thread?

On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:13:51 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:09:41 AM UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:06:14 PM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 19:25:14 -0700 (PDT), palsing
wrote:

You had better be sure exactly what it is you are trying to demonstrate at your so-called "outreach."

Must you always have a bone to pick with virtually every offering here? This is a portrait of the Earth and moon from a million miles way, perhaps a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence for you and me and the rest of the world.

He's a piece of human dog****. What do you expect?

I expect him to learn from his errors... but obviously I'm wrong...

What errors in this thread?

social errors, lots of them...

On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:08:40 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 11:06:36 PM UTC-4, palsing wrote:
you are NOT the smartest bear on the block, regardless of your thinking otherwise.

Let's see... I check out the -actual- albedo of the Moon and various surfaces (dirt, grass, forests, etc.) of the Earth, look at the animation in monochrome, directly compare the Moon's gray-brown with the Earth's gray-brown land areas, note that the oceans are about the same albedo as well, post an example of a optical illusion that has some bearing on this issue,...

You and peterson, OTOH, are fooled by the Earth's pretty blue ocean and its bright white clouds into thinking that the Moon is "astoundingly" and astonishingly dark, whereas I was not misled.

That simply means that I am smarter than either of you.

This is what you sound like...

http://img.picturequotes.com/2/7/685...re-quote-1.jpg

.... down-right sociopath, with very few obvious redeeming qualities...

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:17:49 AM UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:13:51 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:09:41 AM UTC-4, palsing wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:06:14 PM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 19:25:14 -0700 (PDT), palsing
wrote:

You had better be sure exactly what it is you are trying to demonstrate at your so-called "outreach."

Must you always have a bone to pick with virtually every offering here? This is a portrait of the Earth and moon from a million miles way, perhaps a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence for you and me and the rest of the world.

He's a piece of human dog****. What do you expect?

I expect him to learn from his errors... but obviously I'm wrong...

What errors in this thread?

social errors, lots of them...

What "social errors?"

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:18:03 AM UTC-4, palsing wrote:

... down-right sociopath, with very few obvious redeeming qualities...

YOU NEED to watch your libelous statements.

On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:11:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

peterson, your ideas might be taken more seriously if you would refrain from insulting people after they point out your errors and misconceptions, not to mention your lies.

I've seen nothing to suggest that my ideas aren't taken seriously by
anybody around here who matters.

On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 1:27:29 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:11:54 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

peterson, your ideas might be taken more seriously if you would refrain from insulting people after they point out your errors and misconceptions, not to mention your lies.

I've seen nothing to suggest that my ideas aren't taken seriously by
anybody around here who matters.

The truth is, peterson, you don't really seem to have any worthwhile ideas of your own. You are, however, a veritable font of misinformation.

Your earlier statement:

"But you can sure see in these images how dark the surface of the Moon is compared with the Earth."

is ambiguous at best, but in fact your statement is incorrect and misleading to the innocent people who come to you expecting to learn something.

I tried, rather diplomatically, to set the matter straight and for my troubles you called me a "piece of human dog****."

Don't try to evade that truth or lie your way out of that, it's all there for all to see.

On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:52:58 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Your earlier statement:

"But you can sure see in these images how dark the surface of the Moon is compared with the Earth." ...

You are a noxious piece of crap. There's simply no other way of seeing
you. A detriment to humanity. A waste of oxygen. We'd all benefit if
you simply walked into the ocean or blew your brains out.

On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 9:51:30 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 11:06:36 PM UTC-4, palsing wrote:

Having said that, I do find the images astonishing, something I never dreamed I
would ever see. Magical. Don't you agree?

"Magical?" Do you think the laws of physics don't apply??

No, he is using the word "magical" in a metaphorical sense.

Possible examples of this usage include sentences like:

Glowena mascara brings a magical allure to your face.

The evening together with you, dancing to the music of the tango, was something
magical that I will always remember.

No violation of the laws of physics is implied in either example.

John Savard