Is ISS filled with mold?

On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:36:26 AM UTC-7, wrote:

(Cue peterson to give a line such as "Technically, some of the mold will
survive reentry.")

Fortunately, even if that were true, it would be mold that came from Earth, not
alien space mold, so we've already been exposed to it. It won't turn every
human being on Earth into green goo!

Or even any more of them than are currently being turned into green goo by the
mold we have, which is none. So the mold is no cause for concern, except for
the health and safety of the astronauts in their confined space.

John Savard

Quadibloc wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:36:26 AM UTC-7, wrote:

(Cue peterson to give a line such as "Technically, some of the mold will
survive reentry.")

Fortunately, even if that were true, it would be mold that came from Earth, not
alien space mold, so we've already been exposed to it. It won't turn every
human being on Earth into green goo!

Or even any more of them than are currently being turned into green goo by the
mold we have, which is none. So the mold is no cause for concern, except for
the health and safety of the astronauts in their confined space.

John Savard


Mould has always been a problem in space stations.



http://science.nasa.gov/science-news.../11may_locad3/

On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 3:35:11 PM UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:36:26 AM UTC-7, wsne... wrote:

(Cue peterson to give a line such as "Technically, some of the mold will
survive reentry.")

Fortunately, even if that were true, it would be mold that came from Earth, not
alien space mold, so we've already been exposed to it. It won't turn every
human being on Earth into green goo!

Or even any more of them than are currently being turned into green goo by the
mold we have, which is none. So the mold is no cause for concern, except for
the health and safety of the astronauts in their confined space.

You quoted me out of context, leaving out the " :-) " that conveyed the spirit of my post and not its literal meaning. Do not do that again.

On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 4:48:10 PM UTC-5, Mike Collins wrote:
Quadibloc wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:36:26 AM UTC-7, wrote:

(Cue peterson to give a line such as "Technically, some of the mold will
survive reentry.")

Fortunately, even if that were true, it would be mold that came from Earth, not
alien space mold, so we've already been exposed to it. It won't turn every
human being on Earth into green goo!

Or even any more of them than are currently being turned into green goo by the
mold we have, which is none. So the mold is no cause for concern, except for
the health and safety of the astronauts in their confined space.

John Savard


Mould has always been a problem in space stations.



http://science.nasa.gov/science-news.../11may_locad3/

Irrelevant and off topic post in response to something taken out of context.

On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 6:39:37 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 3:35:11 PM UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:36:26 AM UTC-7, wsne... wrote:

(Cue peterson to give a line such as "Technically, some of the mold will
survive reentry.")

Fortunately, even if that were true, it would be mold that came from Earth, not
alien space mold, so we've already been exposed to it. It won't turn every
human being on Earth into green goo!

Or even any more of them than are currently being turned into green goo by the
mold we have, which is none. So the mold is no cause for concern, except for
the health and safety of the astronauts in their confined space.

You quoted me out of context, leaving out the " :-) " that conveyed the spirit of my post and not its literal meaning. Do not do that again.

You love ordering people around? Delusions of grandeur??

On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 10:17:37 AM UTC-5, boisenberry wrote:

You love ordering people around? Delusions of grandeur??

No, those are your areas of expertise, you fascist sockpuppet.

On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 3:35:11 PM UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote:
On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 6:36:26 AM UTC-7, wsne... wrote:

(Cue peterson to give a line such as "Technically, some of the mold will
survive reentry.")

Fortunately, even if that were true, it would be mold that came from Earth, not
alien space mold, so we've already been exposed to it. It won't turn every
human being on Earth into green goo!

Or even any more of them than are currently being turned into green goo by the
mold we have, which is none. So the mold is no cause for concern, except for
the health and safety of the astronauts in their confined space.

There is the possibility, however remote, that a fungus could thereby be introduced to an ecosystem in which was it not formerly found and potentially becoming an invasive species.

On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 6:56:01 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 10:17:37 AM UTC-5, boisenberry wrote:

You love ordering people around? Delusions of grandeur??

No, those are your areas of expertise, you fascist sockpuppet.

I don't order people around, dip****. Here's you obviously issuing an order: "You quoted me out of context, leaving out the " :-) " that conveyed the spirit of my post and not its literal meaning. Do not do that again." Notice the last sentence, that is an order, yes.
Another thing you do is psychological projection whereby you project on others your own failings. If anyone has fascist (ultra-right wing authoritarian) leanings, it would be you.

On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 11:31:02 AM UTC-5, boisenberry wrote:
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 6:56:01 AM UTC-6, wsne... wrote:
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 10:17:37 AM UTC-5, boisenberry wrote:

You love ordering people around? Delusions of grandeur??

No, those are your areas of expertise, you fascist sockpuppet.

I don't order people around, dip****. Here's you obviously issuing an order:
"You quoted me out of context, leaving out the " :-) " that conveyed the
spirit of my post and not its literal meaning. Do not do that again." Notice
the last sentence, that is an order, yes.

It was quite obviously a suggestion, made so that the poster with whom I was communicating would not embarrass himself further.

Another thing you do is psychological projection whereby you project on others your own failings. If anyone has fascist (ultra-right wing authoritarian) leanings, it would be you.

Fairly recently you implied that I was a fascist and then when I returned the favor you -proved- you were a fascist by making a violent threat.

On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:37:29 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 11:31:02 AM UTC-5, boisenberry wrote:
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 6:56:01 AM UTC-6, wsne... wrote:
On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 10:17:37 AM UTC-5, boisenberry wrote:

You love ordering people around? Delusions of grandeur??

No, those are your areas of expertise, you fascist sockpuppet.

I don't order people around, dip****. Here's you obviously issuing an order:
"You quoted me out of context, leaving out the " :-) " that conveyed the
spirit of my post and not its literal meaning. Do not do that again." Notice
the last sentence, that is an order, yes.

It was quite obviously a suggestion, made so that the poster with whom I was communicating would not embarrass himself further.

Another thing you do is psychological projection whereby you project on others your own failings. If anyone has fascist (ultra-right wing authoritarian) leanings, it would be you.

Fairly recently you implied that I was a fascist and then when I returned the favor you -proved- you were a fascist by making a violent threat.

Fascists are ultra-right wing authoritarians with a populist message. They tend to have many followers of low intelligence who want to take their country back (to a golden age that never existed). You could never succeed as a fascist because nobody would follow you. You're just a wannabe follower of fascism, in other words a simple dip****.