|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Replacements for Orion?
On 4/6/2010 6:21 AM, Jeff Findley wrote:
Spread the wealth...first you have Delta IV and Atlas V meeting the same military requirement, now it's time to bring in ATK with a third design for civilian use. One too many pigs in the pork barrel. No kidding. When the EELV costs started to rise (due partly to fewer than expected payloads), there was serious talk about eliminating one of them. Then NASA comes along and creates yet another launch vehicle in the same payload class. Absolute stupidity macro-economically. Oh, we _had_ to make both the Delta IV and Atlas V to assure a launch capability in case something went wrong with one, like some sort of mutant metal-eating bacteria got onto it. That's the same reason we deployed both the Lockheed-Martin F-22 and Northrop F-23 air superiority fighters; in case some sort of composite-eating mutant termites got into one of the two aircraft. Don't even get me started on the Joint Strike Fighter and the locust infestation at the Boeing plant, or the plague of frogs at the Lockheed-Martin plant. If that wasn't a wake-up call, nothing was. ;-) Pat |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Replacements for Orion?
On 4/6/2010 2:05 PM, Brian Thorn wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 06:45:01 -0800, Pat wrote: As to why they have their assembly site in Washington state and their test area in Texas, rather than just put the whole works in Texas, is a good question. If you've been to West Texas, you wouldn't have to ask... But those two tortoises, Kurt And Courtney, would be right at home. Pat |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Replacements for Orion?
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message dakotatelephone... On 4/6/2010 6:21 AM, Jeff Findley wrote: Spread the wealth...first you have Delta IV and Atlas V meeting the same military requirement, now it's time to bring in ATK with a third design for civilian use. One too many pigs in the pork barrel. No kidding. When the EELV costs started to rise (due partly to fewer than expected payloads), there was serious talk about eliminating one of them. Then NASA comes along and creates yet another launch vehicle in the same payload class. Absolute stupidity macro-economically. Oh, we _had_ to make both the Delta IV and Atlas V to assure a launch capability in case something went wrong with one, like some sort of mutant metal-eating bacteria got onto it. That's the same reason we deployed both the Lockheed-Martin F-22 and Northrop F-23 air superiority fighters; We never *deployed* the YF-23; it was a bidding competition for the Advanced Technology Fighter and the YF-22 won. Just like the YF-16 won over the YF-17 in the 70's (although the YF-17 design was so good it came back as the F-18 Hornet). in case some sort of composite-eating mutant termites got into one of the two aircraft. Don't even get me started on the Joint Strike Fighter and the locust infestation at the Boeing plant, or the plague of frogs at the Lockheed-Martin plant. If that wasn't a wake-up call, nothing was. ;-) Pat |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Replacements for Orion?
On 4/21/2010 2:14 PM, Joseph S. Powell, III wrote:
"Pat wrote in message dakotatelephone... On 4/6/2010 6:21 AM, Jeff Findley wrote: Spread the wealth...first you have Delta IV and Atlas V meeting the same military requirement, now it's time to bring in ATK with a third design for civilian use. One too many pigs in the pork barrel. No kidding. When the EELV costs started to rise (due partly to fewer than expected payloads), there was serious talk about eliminating one of them. Then NASA comes along and creates yet another launch vehicle in the same payload class. Absolute stupidity macro-economically. Oh, we _had_ to make both the Delta IV and Atlas V to assure a launch capability in case something went wrong with one, like some sort of mutant metal-eating bacteria got onto it. That's the same reason we deployed both the Lockheed-Martin F-22 and Northrop F-23 air superiority fighters; We never *deployed* the YF-23; That was a joke. I was pointing out that we would have deployed both if we had been using the same sort of approach to the ATF that we did for Atlas-V/Delta-IV Heavy. It would have been interesting if the ATB program had gotten as far as a fly-off between the Northrop and Lockheed candidates, as Lockheed's Senior Peg was a pretty wild looking design in its own right: http://files.abovetopsecret.com/uplo...SENIOR_PEG.jpg http://www.dreamlandresort.com/black...enior_peg.html Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shuttle APU Replacements | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 14 | April 25th 08 04:29 PM |
Replacements for Shuttle CAP mission | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 7th 08 04:38 PM |
Revamp of telecom/IT for the shuttle replacements ? | John Doe | Space Shuttle | 2 | October 26th 07 03:08 AM |
hubble replacements | BlagooBlanaa | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | March 9th 06 04:07 AM |
Emergency shuttle replacements | Jeff Findley | Space Shuttle | 9 | October 5th 04 10:59 PM |