NASA scuttling more space missions so it can spend more on global warming

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:30:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

I didn't edit out anything.

You DID edit, twice now. Go back to see what you did. There is no point in your lying about it.

Unfortunately, you're too stupid to conduct any sort of reasonable
discussion with. Since you don't even understand how quoting works, or
what it's function is, it's hardly surprising that you don't
understand anything about civics, political theory, economics,
philosophy, etc.

On 3/14/2014 5:32 AM, wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 3:01:20 AM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On 3/13/2014 12:48 PM, wsnell01 wrote:

edit

BTW, who is Hagar?

Hagar of mostly alt.astronomy is one of yours, so feel free to tell us
who Hagar really is.

I don't read alt.astronomy, and Hagar has not posted in this SAA thread so far. (My question was rhetorical.)


You like to interpret history so that those of your kind are never held
accountable. In other words, it's always the fault of those other guys.

Read the first two paragraphs of the following link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisio...ea#North_Korea

Clearly, the USSR created North Korea.

That is very true, in that the USSR screwed up by allowing NK to get in
charge of what the US and USSR as having divided Korea for reasons not
favorable for anyone.

However, the USSR was after all quite devastated by WWII and their
essentially saving our butts from the otherwise certain demise via
Hitler and his Zionist peers.

Are you suggesting that the cold-war era wasn't mutually perpetrated?

On Friday, March 14, 2014 3:46:54 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On 3/14/2014 5:32 AM, wsnell01 wrote:

On Friday, March 14, 2014 3:01:20 AM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:

You like to interpret history so that those of your kind are never held
accountable. In other words, it's always the fault of those other guys.

Read the first two paragraphs of the following link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisio...ea#North_Korea

Clearly, the USSR created North Korea.

That is very true, in that the USSR screwed up by allowing NK to get in
charge of what the US and USSR as having divided Korea for reasons not
favorable for anyone.

Korea hadn't been divided, only occupied in the North by the USSR and in the South by the US. The USSR blocked efforts to unite the two zones.

However, the USSR was after all quite devastated by WWII and their
essentially saving our butts from the otherwise certain demise via
Hitler and his Zionist peers.

They were saving their own butts and only declared war on Japan (Aug 8) two days before the Japanese surrendered (Aug 10, 1945.) They also hadn't even entered Korea until that date of surrender.

Are you suggesting that the cold-war era wasn't mutually perpetrated?

Are you suggesting that the Cold War could have been avoided if the US had allowed the USSR to invade or "communize" any country it wanted?

On Friday, March 14, 2014 2:06:30 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:30:54 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote:

I didn't edit out anything.

You DID edit, twice now. Go back to see what you did. There is no point in your lying about it.

Unfortunately, you're too stupid to conduct any sort of reasonable
discussion with. Since you don't even understand how quoting works, or
what it's function is, it's hardly surprising that you don't
understand anything about civics, political theory, economics,
philosophy, etc.

Here is what I wrote earlier and which you edited in your responses:

"Socialism doesn't allow for individualism; some may prefer to work for, or
divert personal resources to, perfectly fine goals not supported or allowed
by the rest."

What part of that do you disagree with?

On Friday, March 14, 2014 4:04:16 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 3:46:54 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:

On 3/14/2014 5:32 AM, wsnell01 wrote:



On Friday, March 14, 2014 3:01:20 AM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:



You like to interpret history so that those of your kind are never held

accountable. In other words, it's always the fault of those other guys.



Read the first two paragraphs of the following link:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisio...ea#North_Korea



Clearly, the USSR created North Korea.



That is very true, in that the USSR screwed up by allowing NK to get in

charge of what the US and USSR as having divided Korea for reasons not

favorable for anyone.



Korea hadn't been divided, only occupied in the North by the USSR and in the South by the US. The USSR blocked efforts to unite the two zones.



However, the USSR was after all quite devastated by WWII and their

essentially saving our butts from the otherwise certain demise via

Hitler and his Zionist peers.


They were saving their own butts and only declared war on Japan (Aug 8) two days before the Japanese surrendered (Aug 10, 1945.) They also hadn't even entered Korea until that date of surrender.


Are you suggesting that the cold-war era wasn't mutually perpetrated?


Are you suggesting that the Cold War could have been avoided if the US had allowed the USSR to invade or "communize" any country it wanted?

Our mutually perpetrated cold-war era (which started long before WW2 ended), messed everything up for Russia, us and for the world. Obviously that made you and others of your MIC kind, happy campers.

The US did as much towards punishing Russians as did Hitler and Stalin. North Korea emerged practically out of nowhere because those of your kind hated those Russians (namely Stalin) for having saved our butts and most of the world from Hitler (best friend of the Bush family).

There's almost nothing of what your generation and that of your parents did right. When you ignore a situation like NK happening before your eyes, and only do whatever it takes for making that situation worse, you get what you paid for, including the revenge Karma of 9-11.

On Monday, March 17, 2014 1:04:42 AM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Friday, March 14, 2014 4:04:16 PM UTC-7, wrote:

On Friday, March 14, 2014 3:46:54 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:

Are you suggesting that the cold-war era wasn't mutually perpetrated?

Are you suggesting that the Cold War could have been avoided if the US had allowed the USSR to invade or "communize" any country it wanted?

Our mutually perpetrated cold-war era (which started long before WW2 ended), messed everything up for Russia, us and for the world.

http://mentalfloss.com/article/28517...er-berlin-wall

I thought Peterson was out in left field, but you are even worse.

On 3/13/2014 5:44 PM, Chris L Peterson wrote:

I'm not aware of any socialist policies in effect in France. The
country is as capitalistic as the U.S.


You must not pay attention then.....

On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:39:53 -0400, AM wrote:

On 3/13/2014 5:44 PM, Chris L Peterson wrote:

I'm not aware of any socialist policies in effect in France. The
country is as capitalistic as the U.S.


You must not pay attention then.....

Oh, I pay attention just fine.

Socialism is largely non-existent in the developed western world.

On Monday, March 17, 2014 10:28:12 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:39:53 -0400, AM wrote:



On 3/13/2014 5:44 PM, Chris L Peterson wrote:



I'm not aware of any socialist policies in effect in France. The

country is as capitalistic as the U.S.

You must not pay attention then.....

Oh, I pay attention just fine.

Now that you are paying attention I'll post this again:

French government expenditures by %GDP are more in line with Cuba's, ie very high.

France certainly needs some capitalism in order not to be a third world country.

However, raising taxes destroys capital:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-1...naire-tax.html

On 3/17/2014 10:28 AM, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:39:53 -0400, AM wrote:

On 3/13/2014 5:44 PM, Chris L Peterson wrote:

I'm not aware of any socialist policies in effect in France. The
country is as capitalistic as the U.S.


You must not pay attention then.....

Oh, I pay attention just fine.

Socialism is largely non-existent in the developed western world.



You have got to be kidding me !