A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Length Contraction: the Most Obvious Idiocy in Einstein's Relativity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 14th 17, 09:51 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Length Contraction: the Most Obvious Idiocy in Einstein's Relativity

All consequences of Einstein's false constant-speed-of-light postulate are idiotic but length contraction is OBVIOUSLY idiotic. It implies that unlimitedly long objects can gloriously be trapped, "in a compressed state", inside unlimitedly short containers:

John Baez: "These are the props. You own a barn, 40m long, with automatic doors at either end, that can be opened and closed simultaneously by a switch. You also have a pole, 80m long, which of course won't fit in the barn. [....] So, as the pole passes through the barn, there is an instant when it is completely within the barn. At that instant, you close both doors simultaneously, with your switch. [...] If it does not explode under the strain and it is sufficiently elastic it will come to rest and start to spring back to its natural shape but since it is too big for the barn the other end is now going to crash into the back door and the rod will be trapped in a compressed state inside the barn." http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...barn_pole.html

"If it does not explode..." - can it explode? Yes, the effect is called "Einsteinian explosion" - it can only occur in Einstein's schizophrenic world:

"In a more complicated version of the paradox, we can physically trap the ladder once it is fully inside the garage. This could be done, for instance, by not opening the exit door again after we close it. In the frame of the garage, we assume the exit door is immovable, and so when the ladder hits it, we say that it instantaneously stops. By this time, the entrance door has also closed, and so the ladder is stuck inside the garage. As its relative velocity is now zero, it is not length contracted, and is now longer than the garage; it will have to bend, snap, or explode."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladder_paradox

That is, Divine Albert's Divine Theory allows a scenario in which the volume of the trapped object is reduced, say, one billion times, and then the object explodes and restores its original volume! What kind of explosion is this, Einsteinians? Just an idiotic consequence of Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate? No? The postulate cannot be false? The Einsteinian lunacy should remain an inherent feature of our civilization?

See, at 7:12 in the video below, how the train is trapped "in a compressed state" inside the tunnel:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrqj88zQZJg
"Einstein's Relativistic Train in a Tunnel Paradox: Special Relativity"

It is not difficult to realize that trapping unlimitedly long objects inside unlimitedly short containers implies unlimited compressibility and drastically violates the law of conservation of energy. The compressed object, in trying to restore its original volume, would produce an enormous amount of work the energy for which comes from nowhere.

At 9:01 in the above video Sarah sees the train falling through the hole, and in order to save Einstein's relativity, the authors of the video inform the gullible world that Adam as well sees the train falling through the hole. However Adam can only see this if the train undergoes an absurd bending first, as shown at 9:53 in the video and in this pictu

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...iation.svg.png

Clearly we have reductio ad absurdum: An absurd bending is required - it does occur in Adam's reference frame but doesn't in Sarah's. Conclusion: The underlying premise, Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate, is false.

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old August 14th 17, 10:59 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Length Contraction: the Most Obvious Idiocy in Einstein's Relativity

Time dilation, another consequence of Einstein's false constant-speed-of-light postulate, is also an idiocy:

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...ity/index.html
John Norton: "The figure shows the bare essentials of the moving clock and all the other clocks spread out along the platform. [...] In short, the moving clock is found to have slowed. It runs at half the speed of the clocks at rest on the platform."

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...y/Clocks_1.png

In Norton's scenario, the single clock is "moving" and the many clocks spread out along the platform are "at rest". Norton correctly concludes that, according to special relativity,

"the MOVING clock is found to have slowed".

However, if the single clock is at rest and the many clocks spread out along the platform are moving past it, Norton will have to conclude that, according to special relativity,

the clock AT REST is found to have slowed.

If the many clocks spread out along the platform move along some closed polygonal line and so repeatedly meet the single clock at rest, an observer at rest, sitting next to the single clock at rest, will get younger and younger than moving observers traveling with the moving clocks (according to special relativity)!

Of course Norton would never say that explicitly but it is implied in his text.

The twin paradox is actually an absurdity - twins at rest get both older and younger than traveling twins.

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old August 15th 17, 08:21 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Length Contraction: the Most Obvious Idiocy in Einstein's Relativity

Arguments advanced by Einsteinians always seem to show that the moving clock is slow while the stationary one is fast, and the alternative - the stationary clock is slow and the moving one is fast, even though predicted by special relativity, somehow remains hidden. Why? Because Einsteinians use a biased scenario. In this scenario the moving system (spaceship, observer in it, observer's clock) is always modeled as point-like while the stationary system is spatially extended. As the moving point-like system traverses distances in the spatially extended stationary system, calculations show that the moving clock runs slower and the moving observer remains younger. For this scenario, special relativity does not allow alternative calculations producing an alternative result.

For a scenario in which the stationary system is modeled as point-like, special relativity acts in an opposite way. Imagine that all ants spread out on the closed polygonal line have clocks and move with constant speed:

http://cliparts101.com/files/131/AB2..._rectangle.png

A single stationary ant, with a clock, is located in the middle of one of the sides of the polygon. As moving ants pass the single stationary ant, they check its (stationary) clock against their (moving) clocks. For this scenario, special relativity predicts that the single stationary clock will shows LESS AND LESS time elapsed than moving clocks consecutively passing it. This implies that the single stationary ant is getting YOUNGER AND YOUNGER than moving brothers it consecutively meets.

Clearly, the twin paradox is actually an absurdity, which means that the underlying premise, Einstein's constant-speed-of-light postulate, is false.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein's Idiocies: Length Contraction Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 April 29th 17 01:17 AM
Reciprocal Length Contraction and Time Dilation: Insight of Genius or Idiocy? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 September 3rd 16 08:07 AM
Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 February 3rd 16 09:41 AM
EINSTEIN'S LENGTH CONTRACTION IS ABSURD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 May 11th 14 10:34 PM
LENGTH CONTRACTION IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 4 August 6th 07 10:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.