A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hubble Question...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old February 2nd 04, 06:38 PM
Andy Long
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble Question...

"Bruce Kille" wrote in message ...
With or without any future service the Hubble will some day go offline.
There have been a lot of ideas floating around as to what to do then.
I was wondering if it could be possible to boost it to a LaGrange Point,
rather than de-orbit it? Is an earth-moon point stable? I know the
earth-sun point can be used as the SOHO satellite is there, but it
would require a lot more fuel to reach. Apparently, recovery of the
Hubble for placement in the Smithsonian is not possible, so I wanted
to put an alternative idea out for discussion.
Bruce




Apologies if I am missing something obvious - but consider the following:

The main reason for not servicing the Hubble AIUI is there is no safe haven or
tile repair system if the orbiter were to be damaged during take off.

The shuttle payload bay has dimensions 15x60ft (4.6x18.3m)
and has a maximum payload weight of approx 50,000lbs (22,680kg)

A Soyuz TM is 7m long, 2.7m diameter and weighs about 7 tons.

So.... on a mission to replace Hubble gyros or add new instruments
why not just load up 2 x Soyuz into the orbiter payload bay? In the
unlikely event of the shuttle being damaged on the way to orbit
you have a bail out facilty for 6 astronauts.

If transfer from the orbiter to 2 different Soyuz's is a problem then fly a
skeleton crew of 3 and engineer a docking adapter directly from the
shuttle payload bay to the Soyuz.



Andy
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA Details Risks to Astronauts on Mission to Hubble Scott M. Kozel Space Shuttle 174 May 14th 04 09:38 PM
NASA Urged to Reconsider Hubble Decision Scott M. Kozel Space Shuttle 116 April 2nd 04 07:14 PM
Don't Desert Hubble Scott M. Kozel Space Shuttle 54 March 5th 04 04:38 PM
Hubble Question... Bruce Kille Space Shuttle 67 February 29th 04 05:30 AM
The Hubble Space Telescope... Craig Fink Space Shuttle 118 December 6th 03 04:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.