|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:37:32 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote in : John Navas wrote: And (more critically) people time. But we love our conspiracy theories, no matter how silly or unfounded. I hear Messenger mission control is in Area 51, controlled by aliens. Okay...everybody ready? The first color image: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...2&image_id=132 Like I said... this isn't a very exciting planet to look at in color. Clearly a fake. There isn't actually a working camera on board, and the satellite never actually made it out of Earth orbit. The aliens are just unfamiliar with Photoshop,. -- Best regards, John Navas Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others) |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
robert casey wrote: The imagers on space probes are usually designed for scientific purposes and not generating eye candy. Don't discount "eye candy" for the public, aka taxpayers. The three-filter color approach movie to the planet was done specifically for public consumption by NASA. This is probably a frame from it: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...2&image_id=132 Pat |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:36:32 -0500, robert casey
wrote in : The imagers on space probes are usually designed for scientific purposes and not generating eye candy. Don't discount "eye candy" for the public, aka taxpayers. NASA doesn't -- see the websites and many images released to the public. -- Best regards, John Navas Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others) |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
On Jan 22, 2:45 pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
robert casey wrote: The imagers on space probes are usually designed for scientific purposes and not generating eye candy. Don't discount "eye candy" for the public, aka taxpayers. The three-filter color approach movie to the planet was done specifically for public consumption by NASA. This is probably a frame from it:http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/....php?gallery_i... Pat Thanks, Pat, as that's a whole lot better. However too bad their image DR is still so limited. PhotoShop image adjustments: Hue Saturation EDIT = MASTER HUE = 0 SATURATION = +75 LIGHTNESS = -5 enlarge image: RESAMPLE = 2X (2048 X 2048) filter image: UNSHARP MASK = 100% RADIUS = 2 THRESHOLD = 4 filter: SHARPEN (once) There's a little more PhotoShop work if you'd like to see the atmosphere. Of course the raw image would have been so much better if we were given the full DR worth pixel data to work with. - Brad Guth |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
On Jan 22, 2:45 pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
robert casey wrote: The imagers on space probes are usually designed for scientific purposes and not generating eye candy. Don't discount "eye candy" for the public, aka taxpayers. The three-filter color approach movie to the planet was done specifically for public consumption by NASA. This is probably a frame from it: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...2&image_id=132 Thanks, Pat, as that's a whole lot better. However too bad their image DR(dynamic range) is still so limited. PhotoShop: c1000_700_430.png @2X along with more color http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...00_700_430.png Embedded: ColorMatch RGB (use the embedded profile) Image Adjustments: Hue Saturation EDIT = MASTER HUE = 0 SATURATION = +75 LIGHTNESS = -5 Image Size: RESAMPLE = 2X (2048 X 2048) Filter Image: UNSHARP MASK = 100% RADIUS = 2 THRESHOLD = 4 Filter: SHARPEN (once) There's a little more PhotoShop work if you'd like to see the atmosphere. Of course the raw image would have been so much better if we were given the full DR worth pixel data to work with. Mercury atmosphe c1000_700_430.png @1X http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...00_700_430.png PhotoShop: Replace Color FUZZINESS: 200 HUE: 0 SATURATION: +100 LIGHTNESS: +10 up to +50 - Brad Guth |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
On Jan 22, 2:50 pm, John Navas wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:36:32 -0500, robert casey wrote in : The imagers on space probes are usually designed for scientific purposes and not generating eye candy. Don't discount "eye candy" for the public, aka taxpayers. NASA doesn't -- see the websites and many images released to the public. I agree, that our NASA is pretty much all about using science hype and "eye candy" infomercials. - Brad Guth |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
On 2008-01-22, Pat Flannery wrote:
John Navas wrote: And (more critically) people time. But we love our conspiracy theories, no matter how silly or unfounded. I hear Messenger mission control is in Area 51, controlled by aliens. Okay...everybody ready? The first color image: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...2&image_id=132 Like I said... this isn't a very exciting planet to look at in color. I don't know; that blue crater right in the middle of frame looks quite interesting. -- Chris Savage Kiss me. Or would you rather live in a Gateshead, UK land where the soap won't lather? - Billy Bragg |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
On Jan 23, 5:09 am, Chris Savage
wrote: On 2008-01-22, Pat Flannery wrote: John Navas wrote: And (more critically) people time. But we love our conspiracy theories, no matter how silly or unfounded. I hear Messenger mission control is in Area 51, controlled by aliens. Okay...everybody ready? The first color image: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/....php?gallery_i... Like I said... this isn't a very exciting planet to look at in color. I don't know; that blue crater right in the middle of frame looks quite interesting. -- Chris Savage Kiss me. Or would you rather live in a Gateshead, UK land where the soap won't lather? - Billy Bragg If you have most any kind of photographic enhancement software, you can do this extremely pastel image one better. This is certainly a whole lot better science worthy look-see at Mercury. However, too bad their extremely pastel image of such pathetic DR(dynamic range) is still so contrast or depth of hue limited. Remember the albedo of 0.12 is getting this moon like orb nearly as dark as coal. http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...00_700_430.png PhotoShop: c1000_700_430.png * Embedded: ColorMatch RGB ("use the embedded profile") Image Adjustments: Hue Saturation EDIT: MASTER HUE: 0 SATURATION: +75 LIGHTNESS: -5 Image Size: RESAMPLE 2X (2048 X 2048) Filter Image: UNSHARP MASK = 100% RADIUS: 2 THRESHOLD: 4 Filter: SHARPEN (once) There's a little more PhotoShop work if you'd like to see those atmospheric related artifacts. Of course the raw image itself would have been so much better off if we were ever given the full DR worth of pixel data to work with. Mercury atmosphe c1000_700_430.png @1X or 2X http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...00_700_430.png PhotoShop: Replace Color FUZZINESS: 200 HUE: 0 SATURATION: +100 LIGHTNESS: +10 up to +50 - Brad Guth |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Okay...everybody ready? The first color image: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...2&image_id=132 Like I said... this isn't a very exciting planet to look at in color. True, but there are grays, browns, and even a bit of bluish looking gray in there. Jeff -- A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind?
On Jan 23, 8:15 am, "Jeff Findley"
wrote: "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Okay...everybody ready? The first color image: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/....php?gallery_i... Like I said... this isn't a very exciting planet to look at in color. True, but there are grays, browns, and even a bit of bluish looking gray in there. Jeff Even in a very pastel kind of way, this is certainly a whole lot better science worthy look-see at Mercury. However, too bad their extremely pastel image of such pathetic DR(dynamic range) is still so contrast impaired or depth of hue saturation limited. Remember the albedo of 0.12 is getting this moon like orb nearly as dark as coal. http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...00_700_430.png PhotoShop: c1000_700_430.png · Embedded: ColorMatch RGB ("use the embedded profile") Image Adjustments: Hue Saturation EDIT: MASTER HUE: 0 SATURATION: +75 LIGHTNESS: -5 Image Size: RESAMPLE 2X (2048 X 2048) Filter Image: UNSHARP MASK = 100% RADIUS: 2 THRESHOLD: 4 Filter: SHARPEN (once) There's a little more PhotoShop work if you'd like to see those atmospheric related artifacts. Of course the raw image itself would have been so much better off if we were ever given the full DR worth of pixel data to work with. Mercury atmosphe c1000_700_430.png @1X or 2X http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/...00_700_430.png PhotoShop: Replace Color FUZZINESS: 200 HUE: 0 SATURATION: +100 LIGHTNESS: +10 up to +50 - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Has NASA's MESSENGER gone color blind? | BradGuth | Policy | 56 | February 5th 08 05:32 AM |
Color Blind Cassini | Chris L Peterson | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | January 10th 05 03:59 AM |
NASA's images of Mars are the wrong color | Alert | Amateur Astronomy | 105 | February 15th 04 01:46 PM |
NASA's images of Mars are the wrong color | Alert | UK Astronomy | 2 | February 4th 04 09:58 PM |
NASA's Space X-Ray Telescope Going Partially Blind | JimO | Policy | 0 | November 6th 03 06:38 PM |