A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA Gravity Probe B mission enters science phase, ready to testEinstein's theory (Forwarded)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 8th 04, 11:38 PM
Andrew Yee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NASA Gravity Probe B mission enters science phase, ready to testEinstein's theory (Forwarded)

Don Savage
NASA Headquarters
(202) 358-1547

Steve Roy
Media Relations Dept.
(256) 544-0034

Robert Kahn
Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
(650) 723-2540

Buddy Nelson
Lockheed Martin, Sunnyvale, Calif.
(510) 797-0349

Status report no.: 04-228

For release: 09/07/04

NASA Gravity Probe B mission enters science phase, ready to test Einstein's theory

Gravity Probe B (GP-B), a NASA spacecraft to test two predictions of Albert
Einstein's general theory of relativity, achieved a major milestone this past
week with the completion of the Initialization and Orbit Calibration (IOC) phase
of its mission and the transition into the science phase. The GP-B mission is
now one step closer to shedding new light on the fundamental properties of our
universe.

"This is the moment we have been waiting for," said Francis Everitt, GP-B
science Principal Investigator at Stanford University. "It represents a
magnificent effort by the entire Stanford-NASA-Lockheed Martin team."

The GP-B spacecraft was launched on April 20, 2004 from Vandenberg Air Force
Base, Calif., aboard a Boeing Delta II expendable launch vehicle. For the past
four months, GP-B has been orbiting 400 miles above Earth, completing system
checkouts and fine-tuning one of the most sophisticated science instruments ever
put in orbit. On August 27 the spacecraft began science data collection.

"It's been a long, amazing road to get to this point," said Rex Geveden, deputy
director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, AL. "When Gravity
Probe B was first proposed more than 40 years ago, the technology required for
this experiment did not yet exist. At least nine new technologies had to be
invented and perfected, with the program's advances only possible through
breakthroughs in cryogenics, drag-free satellite technology, and new
manufacturing and measuring technologies."

The spacecraft uses four ultra-precise gyroscopes to test two extraordinary
predictions of Einstein's 1916 theory that space and time are distorted by the
presence of massive objects. Specifically, it is testing two effects:

1) the geodetic effect -- the amount by which the Earth warps local spacetime in
which it resides, and 2) the frame-dragging effect -- the amount by which the
rotating Earth drags local spacetime around with it.

"It's great to be in our science mode," said Gaylord Green, GP-B Program Manager
at Stanford University. "The team is ecstatic that the demanding IOC phase is
over and the science phase has begun. Most importantly, all systems are meeting
or exceeding the requirements of the mission."

At launch, the spacecraft's Dewar (the largest ever put in orbit) contained
approximately 650 gallons of superfluid helium-enough to maintain the gyroscopes
in a cryogenic state for an estimated 16 months. The GP-B mission time line
originally specified two months for initialization, checkout, and instrument
tuning, 13 months of relativity data collection, and one final month of
instrument re-calibration. The IOC phase actually required a little over four
months to complete. Although this results in a slightly shorter data collection
period than originally planned, GP-B will significantly surpass its mission
performance requirements.

Tuning up the Attitude and Translation Control system to achieve the
extraordinarily precise pointing and drag-free positioning requirements of the
spacecraft, as well as refining the set-up up the science gyros, accounted for
the IOC extension. "These are items that cannot be tested on the ground," said
Gaylord Green. "Using the extra time required for the checkout phase, the team
obtained invaluable information about the GP-B science instrument."

The science phase is the heart of the GP-B mission. During this phase, at least
twice a day, data is relayed from Earth-based ground stations or NASA's data
relay satellites to the GP-B Mission Operations Center at Stanford University in
Stanford, Calif. This data includes space vehicle and instrument performance
information, as well as the very precise measurements of the gyroscopes'
spin-axis alignment relative to its guide star, IM Pegasi. Over the course of a
year, the anticipated spin axis drift for the geodetic effect is a minuscule
angle of 6,614.4 milliarcseconds, and the anticipated spin axis drift for the
frame-dragging effect is even smaller, only 40.9 milliarcseconds. This angle is
so small that if someone were to climb a slope of 40.9 milliarcseconds for 100
miles, he would rise only one inch in altitude, measured to an accuracy of
better than 1/100th of an inch.

The GP-B mission has already achieved many extraordinary accomplishments:

* GP-B is the first satellite ever to achieve both 3-axis attitude control
(pitch, yaw, and roll), and 3-axis drag-free control (while orbiting the Earth,
the whole spacecraft flies around one of the science gyros).

* The GP-B gyros, which are performing perfectly in orbit, will be listed in the
forthcoming edition of the Guinness Book of World Records as being the roundest
objects ever manufactured.

* The spin-down rates of all four gyros are considerably better than expected.
GP-B's conservative requirement was a characteristic spin-down period (time
required to slow down to ~37% of its initial speed) of 2,300 years. Recent
measurements show that the actual characteristic spin-down period of the GP-B
gyros exceeds 10,000 years-well beyond the requirement.

* The magnetic field surrounding the gyros and SQUIDs (Super-conducting QUantum
Interference Device) has been reduced to 10-7 gauss, less than one millionth of
the Earth's magnetic field-the lowest ever achieved in space.

* The gyro readout measurements from the SQUID magnetometers have unprecedented
precision, detecting fields to 10-13 gauss, less than one trillionth of the
strength of Earth's magnetic field.

* The science telescope on board the spacecraft is tracking the guide star, IM
Pegasi (HR 8703), to superb accuracy, and it is also collecting long-term
brightness data on that star.

The GP-B program will not release the scientific results obtained during the
mission until after the science phase has concluded. It is critically important
to thoroughly analyze the data to ensure its accuracy and integrity prior to
releasing the results.

NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center manages the GP-B program. NASA's prime
contractor for the mission, Stanford University, conceived the experiment and is
responsible for the design and integration of the science instrument, as well as
for mission operations and data analysis. Lockheed Martin, a major
subcontractor, designed, integrated and tested the space vehicle and built some
of its major payload components.
  #2  
Old September 9th 04, 06:43 AM
Jim Greenfield
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andrew Yee wrote in message m...
Don Savage
NASA Headquarters
(202) 358-1547

Steve Roy
Media Relations Dept.
(256) 544-0034

Robert Kahn
Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
(650) 723-2540

Buddy Nelson
Lockheed Martin, Sunnyvale, Calif.
(510) 797-0349

Status report no.: 04-228

For release: 09/07/04

NASA Gravity Probe B mission enters science phase, ready to test Einstein's theory

Gravity Probe B (GP-B), a NASA spacecraft to test two predictions of Albert
Einstein's general theory of relativity, achieved a major milestone this past
week with the completion of the Initialization and Orbit Calibration (IOC) phase
of its mission and the transition into the science phase. The GP-B mission is
now one step closer to shedding new light on the fundamental properties of our
universe.

"This is the moment we have been waiting for," said Francis Everitt, GP-B
science Principal Investigator at Stanford University. "It represents a
magnificent effort by the entire Stanford-NASA-Lockheed Martin team."

The GP-B spacecraft was launched on April 20, 2004 from Vandenberg Air Force
Base, Calif., aboard a Boeing Delta II expendable launch vehicle. For the past
four months, GP-B has been orbiting 400 miles above Earth, completing system
checkouts and fine-tuning one of the most sophisticated science instruments ever
put in orbit. On August 27 the spacecraft began science data collection.

"It's been a long, amazing road to get to this point," said Rex Geveden, deputy
director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, AL. "When Gravity
Probe B was first proposed more than 40 years ago, the technology required for
this experiment did not yet exist. At least nine new technologies had to be
invented and perfected, with the program's advances only possible through
breakthroughs in cryogenics, drag-free satellite technology, and new
manufacturing and measuring technologies."

The spacecraft uses four ultra-precise gyroscopes to test two extraordinary
predictions of Einstein's 1916 theory that space and time are distorted by the
presence of massive objects. Specifically, it is testing two effects:

1) the geodetic effect -- the amount by which the Earth warps local spacetime in
which it resides, and 2) the frame-dragging effect -- the amount by which the
rotating Earth drags local spacetime around with it.

"It's great to be in our science mode," said Gaylord Green, GP-B Program Manager
at Stanford University. "The team is ecstatic that the demanding IOC phase is
over and the science phase has begun. Most importantly, all systems are meeting
or exceeding the requirements of the mission."

At launch, the spacecraft's Dewar (the largest ever put in orbit) contained
approximately 650 gallons of superfluid helium-enough to maintain the gyroscopes
in a cryogenic state for an estimated 16 months. The GP-B mission time line
originally specified two months for initialization, checkout, and instrument
tuning, 13 months of relativity data collection, and one final month of
instrument re-calibration. The IOC phase actually required a little over four
months to complete. Although this results in a slightly shorter data collection
period than originally planned, GP-B will significantly surpass its mission
performance requirements.

Tuning up the Attitude and Translation Control system to achieve the
extraordinarily precise pointing and drag-free positioning requirements of the
spacecraft, as well as refining the set-up up the science gyros, accounted for
the IOC extension. "These are items that cannot be tested on the ground," said
Gaylord Green. "Using the extra time required for the checkout phase, the team
obtained invaluable information about the GP-B science instrument."

The science phase is the heart of the GP-B mission. During this phase, at least
twice a day, data is relayed from Earth-based ground stations or NASA's data
relay satellites to the GP-B Mission Operations Center at Stanford University in
Stanford, Calif. This data includes space vehicle and instrument performance
information, as well as the very precise measurements of the gyroscopes'
spin-axis alignment relative to its guide star, IM Pegasi. Over the course of a
year, the anticipated spin axis drift for the geodetic effect is a minuscule
angle of 6,614.4 milliarcseconds, and the anticipated spin axis drift for the
frame-dragging effect is even smaller, only 40.9 milliarcseconds. This angle is
so small that if someone were to climb a slope of 40.9 milliarcseconds for 100
miles, he would rise only one inch in altitude, measured to an accuracy of
better than 1/100th of an inch.

The GP-B mission has already achieved many extraordinary accomplishments:

* GP-B is the first satellite ever to achieve both 3-axis attitude control
(pitch, yaw, and roll), and 3-axis drag-free control (while orbiting the Earth,
the whole spacecraft flies around one of the science gyros).

* The GP-B gyros, which are performing perfectly in orbit, will be listed in the
forthcoming edition of the Guinness Book of World Records as being the roundest
objects ever manufactured.

* The spin-down rates of all four gyros are considerably better than expected.
GP-B's conservative requirement was a characteristic spin-down period (time
required to slow down to ~37% of its initial speed) of 2,300 years. Recent
measurements show that the actual characteristic spin-down period of the GP-B
gyros exceeds 10,000 years-well beyond the requirement.

* The magnetic field surrounding the gyros and SQUIDs (Super-conducting QUantum
Interference Device) has been reduced to 10-7 gauss, less than one millionth of
the Earth's magnetic field-the lowest ever achieved in space.

* The gyro readout measurements from the SQUID magnetometers have unprecedented
precision, detecting fields to 10-13 gauss, less than one trillionth of the
strength of Earth's magnetic field.

* The science telescope on board the spacecraft is tracking the guide star, IM
Pegasi (HR 8703), to superb accuracy, and it is also collecting long-term
brightness data on that star.

The GP-B program will not release the scientific results obtained during the
mission until after the science phase has concluded. It is critically important
to thoroughly analyze the data to ensure its accuracy and integrity prior to
releasing the results.

NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center manages the GP-B program. NASA's prime
contractor for the mission, Stanford University, conceived the experiment and is
responsible for the design and integration of the science instrument, as well as
for mission operations and data analysis. Lockheed Martin, a major
subcontractor, designed, integrated and tested the space vehicle and built some
of its major payload components.


If time passes differently under changed gravity, then time passes
differently at the earth's center, than at the surface, (or a point
above the surface).
Hands up all those who think the earth's center takes a different
amount of time to complete an orbit of the sun, than the
surface???????????????

Jim G
c'=c+v
  #3  
Old September 9th 04, 07:56 AM
Jonathan Silverlight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Jim
Greenfield writes

If time passes differently under changed gravity, then time passes
differently at the earth's center, than at the surface, (or a point
above the surface).
Hands up all those who think the earth's center takes a different
amount of time to complete an orbit of the sun, than the
surface?


I think you'll find that time does _not_ pass differently for an outside
observer (and every particle of an object is effectively an outside
observer). So, no problem.
And just why can't you follow netiquette and trim text?
--
What have they got to hide? Release the ESA Beagle 2 report.
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.
  #4  
Old September 9th 04, 11:16 PM
Jonathan Silverlight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Jonathan Silverlight
writes
In message , Jim
Greenfield writes

If time passes differently under changed gravity, then time passes
differently at the earth's center, than at the surface, (or a point
above the surface).
Hands up all those who think the earth's center takes a different
amount of time to complete an orbit of the sun, than the
surface?


I think you'll find that time does _not_ pass differently for an
outside observer (and every particle of an object is effectively an
outside observer).


I'm fairly sure I got that exactly backwards :-)
Is the difference in time a necessary result of the gravitational
attraction between an object at the centre and the surface? Or even the
cause, in some sense? An object on the sunward side does take a
different time to complete an orbit than one at the centre. That's
because of the sun's gravity, which causes tides which will eventually
slow the earth so it always faces the sun.
It's an interesting question. Help!
  #5  
Old September 10th 04, 06:35 AM
Jim Greenfield
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jonathan Silverlight wrote in message ...
In message , Jonathan Silverlight
writes
In message , Jim
Greenfield writes

If time passes differently under changed gravity, then time passes
differently at the earth's center, than at the surface, (or a point
above the surface).
Hands up all those who think the earth's center takes a different
amount of time to complete an orbit of the sun, than the
surface?


I think you'll find that time does _not_ pass differently for an
outside observer (and every particle of an object is effectively an
outside observer).


I'm fairly sure I got that exactly backwards :-)
Is the difference in time a necessary result of the gravitational
attraction between an object at the centre and the surface? Or even the
cause, in some sense? An object on the sunward side does take a
different time to complete an orbit than one at the centre. That's
because of the sun's gravity, which causes tides which will eventually
slow the earth so it always faces the sun.
It's an interesting question. Help!


Is that one hand up, and one down?
The earth is one body, and orbits the sun as one entity, calculated by
us as being 1 year. But it has differing gravitational "zones", which,
if they DID alter time, logically mandate that each zone would have a
different length "year" (according to GR). ie, each zone takes a
different interval to complete a circuit...... lol

Your first answer was more on the usual Relativity support system;
that observers can BOTH be correct. In this case, one observer can
only view one "shell" of the earth, and make his assesment of its
position in the orbit--
highly unlikely, Jonathon. Help is NOT at hand for GR.

Jim G
c'=c+v
  #6  
Old September 10th 04, 08:29 AM
Jonathan Silverlight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Jim
Greenfield writes

The earth is one body, and orbits the sun as one entity, calculated by
us as being 1 year. But it has differing gravitational "zones", which,
if they DID alter time, logically mandate that each zone would have a
different length "year" (according to GR). ie, each zone takes a
different interval to complete a circuit...... lol


But that was my point. A tidally locked body is only one entity if it
has the strength to resist tidal forces. But I can see that there are
problems looking at the poles (assuming no inclination)
OTOH, gravitational red shift and time dilation has been experimentally
demonstrated (see
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/gratim.html#c2 for
instance). If you say that's not due to relativity it's up to you to
show how.
--
What have they got to hide? Release the ESA Beagle 2 report.
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.
  #7  
Old September 11th 04, 01:33 AM
Jim Greenfield
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jonathan Silverlight wrote in message ...
In message , Jim
Greenfield writes

The earth is one body, and orbits the sun as one entity, calculated by
us as being 1 year. But it has differing gravitational "zones", which,
if they DID alter time, logically mandate that each zone would have a
different length "year" (according to GR). ie, each zone takes a
different interval to complete a circuit...... lol


But that was my point. A tidally locked body is only one entity if it
has the strength to resist tidal forces. But I can see that there are
problems looking at the poles (assuming no inclination)
OTOH, gravitational red shift and time dilation has been experimentally
demonstrated (see
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/gratim.html#c2 for
instance). If you say that's not due to relativity it's up to you to
show how.


"A meter is the distance light travels in (?) secs"- by Relativity
definition.
From that first point on, which erroneously ASSUMES that light travels
independent of source, all data is false, as true distances are
compromised.
Similarly with the clocks; they malfunction with reference to
'universal time". Do you not think it quite ridiculous, that traveller
A sees B's clock going faster (or slower), and vice versa? The
observers are mistaken into misbelief due to the finite duration of
light to travel a course. The simultaneity or otherwise of two or more
actions is not ALTERED by the observers positions- they are just lead
to make wrong conclusions.
Would you expect an hour glass to operate at the same "rate of
transfer" under differing gravity? Well why shouldn't the same apply
to atomic clocks? (actions at a subatomic level). Physicists have
decreed that their super duper clocks are infallible, and NEVER alter-
and yet they still have to be changed every now and then in order to
agree. These "mistakes/malfunctions seem to be conveniently overlooked
when doing experiments such as taking one around the world!

Jim G
c'=c+v
  #8  
Old September 13th 04, 10:00 PM
Steve Willner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If time passes differently under changed gravity, then time passes
differently at the earth's center, than at the surface, (or a point
above the surface).
Hands up all those who think the earth's center takes a different
amount of time to complete an orbit of the sun, than the
surface?


In article ,
Jonathan Silverlight writes:
It's an interesting question. Help!


As usual in these sorts of questions, the key is to keep in mind what
reference frame each "observer" is using. From the context, I assume
we want to ignore secular perturbations, the fact that a year is not
an integer number of days, and the Sun's acceleration in its orbit
around the Galaxy.

For an observer in a reference frame fixed with respect to the Sun,
the Earth's center and a point on Earth's surface take the same time
to complete a year. However, observers at different gravitational
potentials will have clocks that run at different rates. This is
just gravitational redshift.


In article ,
(Jim Greenfield) writes:
Similarly with the clocks; they malfunction with reference to
'universal time".


How, exactly, is one supposed to measure "universal time?"

Do you not think it quite ridiculous, that traveller
A sees B's clock going faster (or slower), and vice versa?


Doppler shift is pretty easy to demonstrate. An observer on the
ground hears a train whistle at a different pitch than a rider on the
train. Likewise, a train rider would hear a stationary whistle at a
different pitch than the observer on the ground. Each whistle is, in
effect, a clock (just add a microphone and a counter). What is so
ridiculous about these clocks running at different rates, depending
on who is measuring them?

--
Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123

Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
(Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a
valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial
email may be sent to your ISP.)
  #9  
Old September 16th 04, 10:46 PM
Joseph Lazio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"JG" == Jim Greenfield writes:

JG If time passes differently under changed gravity, then time passes
JG differently at the earth's center, than at the surface, (or a
JG point above the surface). Hands up all those who think the
JG earth's center takes a different amount of time to complete an
JG orbit of the sun, than the surface???????????????

My hand is up.

As Steve Willner has pointed out already, gravitational fields do
affect the rate at which time passes. A hypothetical observer fixed
out in space over one of the Sun's poles will measure a different
number of seconds for the Earth to complete one orbit than would an
observer on the surface of the Earth. The reason is because the
observer on the Earth is in a larger gravitational potential than the
one out in space.

This is a well-known effect and has to be taken into account in order
that the GPS system works.

--
Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail:
No means no, stop rape. |
http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/
sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Gravitational Instability Theory on the Formation of the Universe Br Dan Izzo Policy 6 September 7th 04 09:29 PM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 April 2nd 04 12:01 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 February 2nd 04 04:33 AM
Selected Restricted NASA Videotapes Michael Ravnitzky Space Shuttle 5 January 16th 04 05:28 PM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.