A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Technology
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Huygens shortlived?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old January 22nd 05, 11:00 AM
Aidan Karley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Hop David wrote:
There've been lots of pics of Saturn's rings and moons but, come to
think of it, haven't seen many close-ups of Saturn.

In contrast, ISTR Galileo sending many spectacular photos of Jupiter's
"surface".

That's partly because it (Jupiter) offers the most extreme
laboratory for studying deep atmospheres with heating from below, while
Saturn is lesser in all respects - less deep, less dense and less heat
from below.
Also, telescopic observations over extended periods (centuries)
have revealed comparatively less activity than on Jupiter.
So they're concentrating on the moons for the moment. I think the
first 50-odd orbits through the system are designed to give multiple
passes of Titan, then there will be a series of close passes of Titan to
change the orbital attitude and altitude to get a better look at the
inner moons and 'surface'.

--
Aidan Karley,
Aberdeen, Scotland,
Location: 57°10'11" N, 02°08'43" W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233

  #42  
Old January 22nd 05, 01:38 PM
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Hop David wrote:


There've been lots of pics of Saturn's rings and moons but, come to
think of it, haven't seen many close-ups of Saturn.


Cassini got a nice shot of the north polar region recently:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedi...m?imageID=1322

Pat
  #43  
Old January 22nd 05, 08:16 PM
Eric Chomko
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Joseph Lazio ) wrote:
: "RK" == Rodney Kelp writes:

: RK When they going to take a look at the surface of Saturn?

: They aren't, and they can't. In all likelihood, Saturn does not have
: a "surface." Rather, the atmosphere just keeps getting denser and
: denser as you go deeper.

Wouldn't it make sense that Saturn, as well as the other gas planets, has
a thick atmosphere, followed by a liquid layer and then a solid layer
(lithoshere). Unlike earth, they would be gradual from gas to liquid and
liquid to solid. Just a theory of course.

Eric

: --
: Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail:
: No means no, stop rape. |
http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/
: sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html
  #44  
Old January 22nd 05, 10:21 PM
George William Herbert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eric Chomko wrote:
Joseph Lazio ) wrote:
: "RK" == Rodney Kelp writes:
: RK When they going to take a look at the surface of Saturn?
: They aren't, and they can't. In all likelihood, Saturn does not have
: a "surface." Rather, the atmosphere just keeps getting denser and
: denser as you go deeper.

Wouldn't it make sense that Saturn, as well as the other gas planets, has
a thick atmosphere, followed by a liquid layer and then a solid layer
(lithoshere). Unlike earth, they would be gradual from gas to liquid and
liquid to solid. Just a theory of course.


That depends on the planet and its mass.

One thing to realize is that the pressures are very high
(Jupiter's core is at about 80 megabars) and temperatures
are also very high (20-30,000 K in the core of Jupiter).
Solid metallic hydrogen requires low temperatures.

Uranus and Neptune probably don't have liquid or solid
hydrogen at their cores; they do apparently have a liquid
core of water, then some solid ices around an inner rock core,
but they don't have enough total mass to compress the
hydrogen enough for it to be liquid or solid.

Saturn apparently has a liquid metallic hydrogen outer core,
under layers of gas and liquid hydrogen. There's a solid
rock/ice core at the middle. The metallic hydrogen isn't
compressed enough to be solid.

Jupiter apparently also has an outer core which is
liquid metallic hydrogen, not solid, and an inner core of
rock and other solids.


-george william herbert


  #45  
Old January 23rd 05, 05:26 PM
Del Cotter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, in sci.space.tech,
Hop David said:

John Schilling wrote:
When they going to take a look at the surface of Saturn?

If that wasn't a troll or a joke that went right over my head, the
answer is that Saturn doesn't have a surface.


I am guessing by "surface" Rodney means cloud tops 60,270 km from
Saturn's center.

There've been lots of pics of Saturn's rings and moons but, come to
think of it, haven't seen many close-ups of Saturn.


Saturn has a haze above the cloud tops that makes pictures of it less
interesting from both an aesthetic and a scientific point of view. It's
why you get those spectacular marbled images from Jupiter and just a few
shots of pale streaky Saturn.

It's a good thing for its self-esteem that it has those gorgeous rings,
really :-) Just think what a dull yellow orb it would be otherwise.

Uranus and Neptune make a similar pair: quiet Uranus and swirly
blue-onyx Neptune, with Uranus redeemed by its unusual polar orientation
(when seen at the right time of "year"). ISTR the appearance is again
mostly an effect of high-level haze, although Uranus actually is
genuinely less active than Neptune.

--
Del Cotter
Thanks to the recent increase in UBE, I will soon be ignoring email
sent to . Please send your email to del2 instead.
  #46  
Old January 24th 05, 06:15 AM
dexx
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

All good points made here. I can see now why the proble had to be the
way it was.

An interesting side note. Its been reported that the Parkes
observatory continued to detect data from Huygens 3 hours after Cassini
passed out of range. Whether the data was useful - i dont know.

  #47  
Old January 24th 05, 02:00 PM
Carey Sublette
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"dexx" wrote in message
...
An interesting side note. Its been reported that the Parkes
observatory continued to detect data from Huygens 3 hours after Cassini
passed out of range. Whether the data was useful - i dont know.


Radiotelescopes could detect the Huygens signal (and provided immediate
confirmation that the probe had successfully deployed in Titan's
atmosphere), but they couldn't collect data.

  #48  
Old January 24th 05, 07:37 PM
David Given
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dexx wrote:
[...]
An interesting side note. Its been reported that the Parkes
observatory continued to detect data from Huygens 3 hours after Cassini
passed out of range. Whether the data was useful - i dont know.


Just as a matter of interest, were any of the Earth-based radio telescopes
able to extract actual data from Huygens' datastream, or were they just
picking up the carrier wave? Could we get all those lost pictures from
analysing the telemetry?

--
+- David Given --McQ-+ "Under communism, man exploits man. Under
| | capitalism, it's just the opposite." --- John
| ) | Kenneth Galbrith
+-
www.cowlark.com --+
  #49  
Old January 25th 05, 03:00 AM
Christopher M. Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Carey Sublette wrote:
Radiotelescopes could detect the Huygens signal (and provided immediate
confirmation that the probe had successfully deployed in Titan's
atmosphere), but they couldn't collect data.


Couldn't collect telemetry at least. They ought to be able
to provide some useful dopler data and thus information on
Titan's winds.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Huygens shortlived? dexx Astronomy Misc 45 January 25th 05 03:00 AM
Huygens shortlived? dexx Policy 69 January 25th 05 03:00 AM
Huygens landed! Victor SETI 1 January 15th 05 12:17 AM
Huygens Sets Off With Correct Spin and Speed [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 January 11th 05 07:59 PM
ESA's Huygens Probe Set to Detach From Cassini Orbiter [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 December 22nd 04 01:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.