|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Aurora in N.Y.!!!!!!
Hey Tom R. in Poughkeepsie!
I'm Tom R. in Poughkeepsie too! I saw it too! Talk to me! Tom Randy wrote: Tom R. in Poughkeepsie,N.Y. -- Tom Rankin - Programmer by day, amateur astronomer by night! Mid-Hudson Astronomy Association - http://jump.to/mhaa When replying, remove the capital letters from my email address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Aurora in N.Y.!!!!!!
I'm Tom R. in Poughkeepsie too! I saw it too!
I'm Mark R. in Newburgh, and it was delicious here as well! Mark The Catman ^..^ www.geocities.com/mark_rosengarten Owner/Coordinator of the Neko Ultraportable Solar Observatory Fun WITH The Sun for Everyone! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Aurora in N.Y.!!!!!!
Tom Randy wrote:
: The past hour here in Dutchess county N.Y. we've been having a GRAND : light show! After almost 30 years of astronomy under my belt, : it's my first Aurora and it's AMAZING! AWESOME!!! My first Aurora too! Hi Tom, Tom, and Mark, it's nice to be able to compare notes this way. I saw something of that display from East Fishkill, but I think that I either I missed the peak of the display, or else I actually did catch some strong activity, but didn't see much because of some night blindness (a pulsating shimmering in my vision, which I get often), and/or was not sufficiently dark-adapted. I'm curious to find out whether my timing or my vision was to blame. I intially planned to keep vigil starting with twilight, but I accepted an offer to eat pizza out, and didn't get my first peek until I got out of the car at home somewhere between 7:30 and 7:50 (to the best of my estimation). At that point I was estatic because there was a distinct, large purplish red smear in the northeast centered in altitude a bit above . This was unmistakably it! It was happening! (This was especially nice after fruitlessly setting the alarm for midnight the night before and stumbling out to a quite ordinary night sky). There was another large red spot in the southeast. I couldn't detect any patterns or distinct boundaries of any of the red patches. I noticed some faint whiteness to the north, which I thought at first might be a very thin cirrus patch. But after getting more dark adapted, I was excited to see with the help of averted vision, that this light was actually structured into at least two distinct bands that extended North to South, with distinct linear borders, quite unlike a cloud! This perception was very fleeting; I saw it only off and on over the course of a few minutes, but when it was there it was quite distinct, even if very faint. I was hopefull that either things would intensify, or I would see more once I was completely dark adapted. But instead everything just slowly faded, until by 8:30 I could detect nothing at all anymore. : About 7:00pm ET my cousin's kid come's in and says "there's these wierd : lights in the sky...." I froze and ran outside and HOLY SMOKES!!! Ribbons : of pinish red light is streaming up to the N.E., blueish green ribbons to : the north! I run home, jump in the car, drive to the nearest convienance : store, grab 2 rolls of Kodak 400 and drive home, load the camera and start : shooting. It faded out. 10-15 minutes later it fires up again and I shoot : like a mad man. I hope these come out. Exposures of 10-20 seconds on a : tripod with a cable release using the hat trick. Do you have an estimate of the time of these two peak periods? How bright was everything then compared to say, 8:00? Is it safe to say that these peaks happened before 7:30? (That is the earliest time I probably had first looked.) What did you see at say, 8:00 ET? Was it comparable to what I was seeing at that time? Sorry for all the questions :-) Larry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Aurora in N.Y.!!!!!!
Tom Randy wrote:
: On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:22:46 -0500, Lawrence Troxler wrote: : : I'm curious to find out whether my timing or my vision was : to blame. : It may have been timing and or light pollution. Read on... By "vision", I meant my physical vision potential, which is entirely different from the issue of light pollution! Where I am, it's fairly quiet light-wise, except to the south (where it matters most - argg) where there's the glow from an industrial complex. Of course it's not like what you'd see camping out in the Adirondaks, but really it's not that bad. Let me put it this way: if you're suggesting that light pollution was my problem, then tell me where you're observing from in po-town, and let me know if there's a spot around there that I can set up! I haven't yet got to figuring out what my limiting magnitude is, but I certainly that night, for example, could see that trail of dim stars that go southward from Cassiopeia toward Andromeda. : I posted a few photos to the astro binary newsgroup, they came out o.k. : Tom Yep, the one over the housetop that showed Auriga is somewhat consistent with what I was, at least in azimuth. Except in my case, I perceived the peak of the redness as a bit farther up in altitude. So who know, maybe I have more light pollution then I like to admit which obscures my view close to the horizon. Also I was not able to perceive any sort of structure in the glow that I saw. Larry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Aurora in N.Y.!!!!!!
Tom Randy wrote:
: : Your in Fishkill so maybe you had some light poluttion to the north. Ahh! Now I understand. Could be. Honestly, I've never paid any attention at all to the low altitude north sky, because I never point my scope there below Polaris (GEM user here). So maybe there was a light pollution element, but I still have a hunch that it wasn't a factor, unless all the interesting stuff with this Aurora was happening within, say 20 degrees of the horizon. Next time I'm out with the scope (or without it, for that matter), I'll take a better look at the glow around the horizons. If it's any consolation to you though, the remnants of the East Fishkill IBM plant is across the street to my south. Apparently they still have enough money to keep all the lights running all night. And aside from Aurora's, the south is what's important for astronomy. Larry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Aurora in N.Y.!!!!!!
Tom Randy wrote:
: On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 14:31:31 -0500, Lawrence Troxler wrote: : : If it's any consolation to you though, the remnants of the East Fishkill : IBM plant is across the street to my south. Apparently they still have : enough money to keep all the lights running all night. And aside from : Aurora's, the south is what's important for astronomy. : : Larry : Typical big business BS with those lights. My condolences. Layoff tons of : people but keep the lights burning all night for nothing. Yeah, not TOO : screwed up huh? : I have to deal with the city of Poughkeepsie's damn lights, they wash out : everything up to about 75 degrees from the S.E. to S.W. : To get nice dark skies I have to go out to Millbrook or drive north about : a half hour. : Hang in there Larry, it could be worse I guess. No, _MY_ condolences - you seem to have the bigger problem. OTOH, It just occurred to me that I never actually talked to anyone in the town government about this. Will do that on Monday. Are you a member of the Mid Hudson group, BTW? Been thinking of joining. Of course for me, the trek to Wilcox park is more of a trip than it is for you. But then again, for all of about 20 bucks, I assume there would be a phone call alert chain set up for events like these Larry. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Aurora in N.Y.!!!!!!
Tom Randy wrote:
: It may have been timing and or light pollution. Read on... Hi again, checking out your pictures, I'm just trying to integrate what I saw, to what you took pictures of ... Take Aurora_01.jpg, for example. Looks like you've got Auriga at the horizon there. I saw the redness at the same azimuth, but unlike what's suggested in your photo, it was centered much higher - I remember it being a big featureless smear centered around the altitude of Cassiopeia (maybe 40 degrees?). Try as I might, I couldn't discern any structure in that glow, and it slowly faded once I settled in with my lawn chair.fp Let me ask you this: could you recognize the beam struture that shows in your photograph, while you were looking at it? Sorry for these questions! Larry |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Aurora in N.Y.!!!!!!
We try to keep politics to a minimum. But, the more people you have in
an organization, the more opinions you will get, and conflicting goals, etc. What to do... ??? Regarding the phone call chain, we do that informally. We do not have an organized list. There is actually a service online somewhere, can't find it right now, that will call you if conditions are favorable. Thanks for the kind words, Tom... Tom Randy wrote: Not a member of the club, I'm not into clubs really, too much politics and I HATE politics. The have a decent web site. They seem to be a nice bunch of folks though. -- Tom Rankin - Programmer by day, amateur astronomer by night! Mid-Hudson Astronomy Association - http://jump.to/mhaa When replying, remove the capital letters from my email address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aurora : canada, finland only | Thierry | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | November 1st 03 02:21 PM |
Aurora In Nova Scotia | Craig Levine | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 31st 03 02:22 AM |
[gse-aa] Shock Arrival Heralds Aurora | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 24th 03 08:42 PM |
Aurora Tonight | Michael A. Covington | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | October 15th 03 06:33 PM |
AURORA WATCH: GEOMAGNETIC STORM IN PROGRESS | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 16th 03 01:25 PM |