Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:15:35 +0100
Charles D. Bohne wrote:

Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space
By DENNIS OVERBYE

Published: December 22, 2004

Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is
still life in the old cosmos.

Astronomers announced yesterday that they had discovered three dozen
baby galaxies in what passes for nearby space in the universe - two
billion to four billion light-years distant. The galaxies, which are
blossoming with new stars at a prodigious rate, resemble the infant
Milky Way 10 billion years ago, the astronomers said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/22/sc...partner=rssnyt


will be interesting how this is going to be explained, on NASA TV they
have said that these galaxies were born in a universe that is well past
it's child barring age.

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:38:08 +0000, Ray Vingnutte
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:15:35 +0100
Charles D. Bohne wrote:

Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space
By DENNIS OVERBYE

Published: December 22, 2004

Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is
still life in the old cosmos.

Astronomers announced yesterday that they had discovered three dozen
baby galaxies in what passes for nearby space in the universe - two
billion to four billion light-years distant. The galaxies, which are
blossoming with new stars at a prodigious rate, resemble the infant
Milky Way 10 billion years ago, the astronomers said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/22/sc...partner=rssnyt


will be interesting how this is going to be explained, on NASA TV they
have said that these galaxies were born in a universe that is well past
it's child barring age.

That's because the NASA RZ's refuse to acknowledge that the universe is not
expanding, but is rather donut shaped and matter is continually inverting
and recreating new galaxies.

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:55:15 +0100, Charles D. Bohne
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 00:07:08 GMT, Proxy Bot wrote:

That's because the NASA RZ's refuse to acknowledge that the universe is not
expanding, but is rather donut shaped and matter is continually inverting
and recreating new galaxies.

doughnut?

Yeah, a sphere with a very, very narrow energy vortex core. ;-))

Hint: the universe is a lot more than the matter we see :-))

Indeed, but it is all matter -- there is an 'opposite' for everything. ;-))

You still can't interface with sentient silicon based life though. ;-))

nightbat wrote

Proxy Bot wrote:

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:38:08 +0000, Ray Vingnutte
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:15:35 +0100
Charles D. Bohne wrote:

Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space
By DENNIS OVERBYE

Published: December 22, 2004

Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is
still life in the old cosmos.

Astronomers announced yesterday that they had discovered three dozen
baby galaxies in what passes for nearby space in the universe - two
billion to four billion light-years distant. The galaxies, which are
blossoming with new stars at a prodigious rate, resemble the infant
Milky Way 10 billion years ago, the astronomers said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/22/sc...partner=rssnyt


will be interesting how this is going to be explained, on NASA TV they
have said that these galaxies were born in a universe that is well past
it's child barring age.

Proxy Bot
That's because the NASA RZ's refuse to acknowledge that the universe is not
expanding, but is rather donut shaped and matter is continually inverting
and recreating new galaxies.

nightbat

That's oc's for Wolter's explaination of theoretical Universe
dynamics. See oc, other folks have a liking for your presentation. Zinni
might come in right about now, but who doen't like mind thoughts about
donuts?


the nightbat

From Nightbat:

Zinni might come in right about now, but
who doen't like mind thoughts about
donuts?

Naw, Zinni's favorite is the one about the fridge.g
oc

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:38:34 +0100, Charles D. Bohne
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:19:40 GMT, Proxy Bot wrote:

You still can't interface with sentient silicon based life though. ;-))

Can you?

Yes, but only if it recognizes me.............................

"Bill Sheppard" wrote in message
...
From Nightbat:

Zinni might come in right about now, but
who doen't like mind thoughts about
donuts?

Naw, Zinni's favorite is the one about the fridge.g

How is your fridge these days BS???


oc

generation of revolutionaries the present generation must
reproduce itself abundantly. In doing so they will be worsening the
population problem only slightly. And the most important problem is to
get rid of the industrial system, because once the industrial system
is gone the world's population necessarily will decrease (see
paragraph 167); whereas, if the industrial system survives, it will
continue developing new techniques of food production that may enable
the world's population to keep increasing almost indefinitely.

206. With regard to revolutionary strategy, the only points on which
we absolutely insist are that the single overriding goal must be the
elimination of modern technology, and that no other goal can be
allowed to compete with this one. For the rest, revolutionaries should
take an empirical approach. If experience indicates that some of the
recommendations made in the foregoing paragraphs are not going to give
good results, then those recommendations should be discarded.

TWO KINDS OF TECHNOLOGY



207. An argument likely to be raised against our proposed revolution
is that it is bound to fail, because (it is claimed) throughout
history technology has always progressed, never regressed, hence
technological regression is impossible. But this claim is false.

208. We distinguish between two kinds of technology, which we will
call small-scale technology and organization-dependent technology.
Small-scale technology is technology that can be used by small-scale
communities without outside assistance. Organization-dependent
technology is technology that depends on large-scale social
organization. We are aware of no significant cases of regression in
small-scale technology. But organization-dependent technology DOES
regress when the social organization on wh

world's population has become so overblown
that it cannot even feed itself any longer without advanced
technology. Even if the breakdown is gradual enough so that reduction
of the population can occur more through lowering of the birth rate
than through elevation of the death rate, the process of
de-industrialization probably will be very chaotic and involve much
suffering. It is naive to think it likely that technology can be
phased out in a smoothly managed orderly way, especially since the
technophiles will fight stubbornly at every step. Is it therefore
cruel to work for the breakdown of the system? Maybe, but maybe not.
In the first place, revolutionaries will not be able to break the
system down unless it is already in deep trouble so that there would
be a good chance of its eventually breaking down by itself anyway; and
the bigger the system grows, the more disastrous the consequences of
its breakdown will be; so it may be that revolutionaries, by hastening
the onset of the breakdown will be reducing the extent of the
disaster.

168. In the second place, one has to balance the struggle and death
against the loss of freedom and dignity. To many of us, freedom and
dignity are more important than a long life or avoidance of physical
pain. Besides, we all have to die some time, and it may be better to
die fighting for survival, or for a cause, than

"Charles D. Bohne" wrote in message
...
Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space
By DENNIS OVERBYE

Published: December 22, 2004

Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is still
life in the old cosmos.

Astronomers announced yesterday that they had discovered three dozen
baby galaxies in what passes for nearby space in the universe - two
billion to four billion light-years distant. The galaxies, which are
blossoming with new stars at a prodigious rate, resemble the infant
Milky Way 10 billion years ago, the astronomers said.


So what is so surprising about the newly found galaxies ?? We know that
about 75% to 85% of the calculated matter of the universe is invisible. We
know that the universe is expanding at an increasing rate. The expansion
rate lowers the density of the universe, thus lowering its internal
pressure, allowing some of that unseen dark matter to condense into visible
matter, i.e. new galaxies.