life supporting atmospheres

On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:48:40 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote:

On Sunday, August 4, 2013 11:10:11 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Nasa seriously needs to consider how can they detect a moon orbiting a

planet if they wish to find signs of life. without a large enough moon

in a stable orbit the planet will never support life.

Earth's moon helps to airdate water,so fish can breath. Rain puts water on land surface
so fresh watyer life can live . All life came out of the oceans one way or another.
In about 25,000 years we will have found planets that do not have a land surface,and
all life is found under their one vast ocean. Think of two of Jupiter's planets and you get
he picture. TreBert

bert earths moon does somewhat move the water around but it is water
mainly recieves its oxygen from the wind as it creates the waves and
that is what puts most of the o2 back in the water. I have explained
what the moon does for earth and for life. so I wont do it again if
you would read the entire thread then you would know

On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:08:33 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth

wrote:



On Sunday, August 4, 2013 8:10:11 AM UTC-7, wrote:

Nasa seriously needs to consider how can they detect a moon orbiting a



planet if they wish to find signs of life. without a large enough moon



in a stable orbit the planet will never support life.



Actually, a life supporting atmosphere should be allowed to cover a fairly

wide scope with genetic evolution and/or adaptation, not to mention

what applied physics and its scientific levels of technology can help

life of all sorts to survive in places thought too lethal for

Goldilocks.



Without good intelligence and applied technology, much if not the vast majority of Earth is not Goldilocks suitable.



It would seem that you have failed to realize what goldilox means or

actually is. Goldilox is just a area in which the ability to sustain

at atmosphere such as the earth can survive with life. saying that

that a vast majority of earth is not that way means nothing. if only

one square mile was able to support life then that would mean earth

was in a goldiliox zone. if only one square inch was able to support

life then that would mean earth is in the goldilox zone.

The vast majority of our planet surface area is simply not suitable for humans, unless our intelligence of using physics, science and applied technology gets involved, and otherwise only at best .0001% of its all-inclusive volume can be safely utilized. In my book, that's not very Goldilocks worthy..

On Sunday, August 4, 2013 11:10:11 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Nasa seriously needs to consider how can they detect a moon orbiting a

planet if they wish to find signs of life. without a large enough moon

in a stable orbit the planet will never support life.

bil its the moon that creates high tides. Lining up of Sun & Moon gives high spring tides. When there is a high tide on one side of the Earth there is also a high tide on the other side. "Do you know why?" Tricky stuff gravity TreBert

On Thursday, August 15, 2013 6:21:14 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2 wrote:
On Sunday, August 4, 2013 11:10:11 AM UTC-4, wrote:

Nasa seriously needs to consider how can they detect a moon orbiting a



planet if they wish to find signs of life. without a large enough moon



in a stable orbit the planet will never support life.



bil its the moon that creates high tides. Lining up of Sun & Moon gives high spring tides. When there is a high tide on one side of the Earth there is also a high tide on the other side. "Do you know why?" Tricky stuff gravity TreBert

It's also tidal driven heating, as mostly derived from our moon, that's giving our Goldilocks its Eden worthy environment, because the solar photosphere heat that's radiated our way isn't all that responsible for heating the vast bulk of our planet.

This is not saying that our mostly transparent troposphere and surface could remain unfrozen without the photosphere benefits, although the environment of whatever's a km or deeper below our feet has damn little to do with any amount of solar energy, other than its unavoidable tidal heating process. Having an enormous moon is actually highly advantageous as to keeping us within our Goldilocks comfort zone, and by using our moon to help regulate the global surface temperature should be considered as a very good thing for salvaging our planet that's going to need every advantage as our sun keeps getting nastier and us humans keep consuming every speck of energy with no concern as to the consequences and the unavoidable Karma of poor efficiency or waste that's taking place.

On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:48:40 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2 wrote:
On Sunday, August 4, 2013 11:10:11 AM UTC-4, wrote:

Nasa seriously needs to consider how can they detect a moon orbiting a



planet if they wish to find signs of life. without a large enough moon



in a stable orbit the planet will never support life.



Earth's moon helps to airdate water,so fish can breath. Rain puts water on land surface so fresh watyer life can live . All life came out of the oceans one way or another. In about 25,000 years we will have found planets that do not have a land surface,and all life is found under their one vast ocean. Think of two of Jupiter's planets and you get the picture. TreBert

We also know that complex life can evolve and/or adapt to pressure and temperature extremes that far exceed what we typically interpret as Goldilocks worthy.

On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:00:55 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
wrote:

On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:08:33 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth

wrote:



On Sunday, August 4, 2013 8:10:11 AM UTC-7, wrote:



It would seem that you have failed to realize what goldilox means or

actually is. Goldilox is just a area in which the ability to sustain

at atmosphere such as the earth can survive with life. saying that

that a vast majority of earth is not that way means nothing. if only

one square mile was able to support life then that would mean earth

was in a goldiliox zone. if only one square inch was able to support

life then that would mean earth is in the goldilox zone.

The vast majority of our planet surface area is simply not suitable for humans,
unless our intelligence of using physics, science and applied technology gets involved
and otherwise only at best .0001% of its all-inclusive volume can be safely utilized.
n my book, that's not very Goldilocks worthy.


ok now I see that you do realize what the goldilox zone and you are
just posting fluff.

On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:09:59 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
wrote:

On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:48:40 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2 wrote:
On Sunday, August 4, 2013 11:10:11 AM UTC-4, wrote:

Nasa seriously needs to consider how can they detect a moon orbiting a



planet if they wish to find signs of life. without a large enough moon



in a stable orbit the planet will never support life.



Earth's moon helps to airdate water,so fish can breath. Rain puts water on land surface so fresh watyer life can live
. All life came out of the oceans one way or another. In about
25,000 years we will have found planets that do not have a land
surface,and all life is found under their one vast ocean. Think of two
of Jupiter's planets and you get the picture. TreBert

We also know that complex life can evolve and/or adapt to pressure and temperature extremes that far exceed what we
typically interpret as Goldilocks worthy.


There is a word for that uhh let me think. uhh I think but I am noit
sure that is called evolultion

On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:21:14 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote:

On Sunday, August 4, 2013 11:10:11 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Nasa seriously needs to consider how can they detect a moon orbiting a

planet if they wish to find signs of life. without a large enough moon

in a stable orbit the planet will never support life.

bil its the moon that creates high tides. Lining up of Sun & Moon gives high spring tides.
when there is a high tide on one side of the Earth there is also a
high tide on the other side. "Do you know why?" Tricky stuff gravity
treBert

Dude I am perfectly famaliar with what tides are and what it means and
there is nothing tricky about gravity in that respect.

On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:21:14 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote:

On Sunday, August 4, 2013 11:10:11 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Nasa seriously needs to consider how can they detect a moon orbiting a

planet if they wish to find signs of life. without a large enough moon

in a stable orbit the planet will never support life.

bil its the moon that creates high tides. Lining up of Sun & Moon gives high spring tides.
When there is a high tide on one side of the Earth there is also a high tide on the other side.
"Do you know why?" Tricky stuff gravity TreBert

also bert it has nothing whatsoever with life. I mean it may but not
in a major way. it also has nothing to do with the post

On Friday, August 16, 2013 11:25:27 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:00:55 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth

wrote:



On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:08:33 AM UTC-7, wrote:

On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth



wrote:







On Sunday, August 4, 2013 8:10:11 AM UTC-7, wrote:







It would seem that you have failed to realize what goldilox means or



actually is. Goldilox is just a area in which the ability to sustain



at atmosphere such as the earth can survive with life. saying that



that a vast majority of earth is not that way means nothing. if only



one square mile was able to support life then that would mean earth



was in a goldiliox zone. if only one square inch was able to support



life then that would mean earth is in the goldilox zone.



The vast majority of our planet surface area is simply not suitable for humans,

unless our intelligence of using physics, science and applied technology gets involved

and otherwise only at best .0001% of its all-inclusive volume can be safely utilized.

n my book, that's not very Goldilocks worthy.





ok now I see that you do realize what the goldilox zone and you are

just posting fluff.

Most idiots and typically naysayers seem to think that any worthwhile Goldilocks planet or moon has to offer a substantial area that's Eden like, perhaps because they have no physics nor any science expertise to fall back on. Apparently their education maxed out before getting through 5th grade.

Perhaps the posting of fluff seems to be within your expertise, that's even similar to FUD.

In order to get our topics past these mainstream FUD-masters and their MIB army of brown-nosed clowns that have their instructions to topic/author stalk, we need to point out that this form of publishing to the world is a kind of infowar w/o borders.