A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Comet 17P - Estimate of physical size



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 26th 07, 08:19 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
canopus56[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 556
Default Comet 17P - Estimate of physical size

Estimate of physical size of Comet 17P:

2 arcmins = 120 arcsecs =~ dia. 142472 kilometers
3 arcmins = 180 arcsecs =~ dia. 213708 kilometers

Computations - using the sine rule

1 a.u. = 149,597,870.691 kilometers ; wikipedia
Distance Earth to Comet 17P Oct 25 = 1.637 a.u. ; NASA-JPL Near
Earth Object simulator
Distance Earth to Comet 17P Oct 25 = 244,891,714 ; Product
Comet 17P object size: 2-3 arcmin ; my obs and other internet reports

Physical diameter using the sine rule from object's diameter in
arcsecs:

Physical diameter = [ Deg2Rad( Objdiameter_arcsec / 3600#) ) *
Distance_to-Object ]

Results for 120 and 180 arcsecs:

120 arcsecs =~ 142472 kilometers
180 arcsecs =~ 213708 kilometers

Diameter of major planets ; wikipedia

Jupiter 142985 km
Saturn 120534 km

Worked example for 120 arcsecs:

Objdia/3600 = 0.0333333
Deg2Rad ( Objdia/3600 ) = 5.8173 x 10^-4 = 0.00058173
Deg2Rad ( Objdia/3600 ) * Dist_to_object = 0.00058173 x 244,891,714
Deg2Rad ( Objdia/3600 ) * Dist_to_object =~ 142,462

- C

  #2  
Old October 26th 07, 09:20 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,007
Default Comet 17P - Estimate of physical size

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:19:31 -0700, canopus56
wrote:

Estimate of physical size of Comet 17P:

2 arcmins = 120 arcsecs =~ dia. 142472 kilometers
3 arcmins = 180 arcsecs =~ dia. 213708 kilometers


As of last night, I put the distinct coma size at 6 arcmin, with a
diffuse coma extending to 17 arcmin. So I'd make those sizes several
times larger.

Intensity profiles from the last two nights are at
http://www.cloudbait.com/gallery/comet/holmes.html

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
  #3  
Old October 26th 07, 11:16 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
canopus56[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 556
Default Comet 17P - Estimate of physical size

On Oct 26, 2:20 pm, Chris L Peterson wrote:
As of last night, I put the distinct coma size at 6 arcmin, with a
diffuse coma extending to 17 arcmin. So I'd make those sizes several
times larger. snip


Thanks, Chris. I have created a physical size reference table for 2
to 30 arcmins based on today's distance estimate here -

http://www.utahastronomy.com/Current...e_of_Comet_17P

- Canopus56

  #4  
Old October 27th 07, 05:12 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,007
Default Comet 17P - Estimate of physical size

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:16:22 -0700, canopus56
wrote:

Thanks, Chris. I have created a physical size reference table for 2
to 30 arcmins based on today's distance estimate here -

http://www.utahastronomy.com/Current...e_of_Comet_17P


Good thing. Before the snow rolled in this evening, I got more images.
The coma is now well over 10 arcmin across. I've updated the profiles at
http://www.cloudbait.com/gallery/comet/holmes.html ; it is now obvious
that the nucleus has split, or that the coma is becoming significantly
offset from the nucleus (can't really say which).

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
  #5  
Old October 27th 07, 05:35 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Greg Crinklaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 886
Default Comet 17P - Estimate of physical size

Chris L Peterson wrote:
Good thing. Before the snow rolled in this evening, I got more images.
The coma is now well over 10 arcmin across. I've updated the profiles at
http://www.cloudbait.com/gallery/comet/holmes.html ; it is now obvious
that the nucleus has split, or that the coma is becoming significantly
offset from the nucleus (can't really say which).


I think what we are seeing may simply be a projection effect: the bright
elongated inner region may well be the tail seen extending behind the
comet (and a bit to the side). The offset in general may be due to the
approximately 15 degree viewing angle. One thing for su we don't get
the chance to see bright active comes from the point of view very often.

Clear skies,
Greg

--
Greg Crinklaw
Astronomical Software Developer
Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m)

SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html
Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html
Comets: http://comets.skyhound.com

To reply take out your eye
  #6  
Old October 28th 07, 08:17 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
canopus56[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 556
Default Comet 17P - Estimate of physical size

On Oct 26, 1:19 pm, canopus56 wrote:
snip all

In a Cloudy Night's forum, someone pointed out that you can use the
Google search box's built-in calculator to find the physical size of
Comet 17P. In general -

sin ( radians (your_arcmins arcmins) ) * 1.62900 [a.u.] * 149 597 871
= physical size 17P

Get the current day's distance to Comet 17P from the NASA-JPL Near
Earth Object orbit simulator -

http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=17P&orb=1

An example of a string that is formated for use in the Google search
box is:

sin(radians * (10 arcminutes)) * 1.62900 * 149 597 871

which yields = 708 878.821 kilometers

According to Allen's Astrophysical Quantities, typical comet coma
physical diameters are 10,000 to 100,000 km.

- Canopus56


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the size and velocity of Comet McNaught (C/2006 P1)? Misc 14 April 3rd 07 01:24 AM
How to estimate equivalent exposure time for Wratten filters? canopus56 Amateur Astronomy 2 February 17th 06 09:55 PM
Drake increases estimate to 50K communicating E.T. civilizations Jason H. SETI 19 July 23rd 05 04:59 AM
Estimate number of stellar mass black holes esexauer Misc 0 January 19th 05 09:05 AM
cost estimate of Meade upgrade/ optics correction?? Jon Kickerston Amateur Astronomy 44 June 16th 04 05:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.