|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
7 days = 3,833 *10^9 years/(200 *10^9 stars of galaxy)?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:26:58 -0800 (PST), Ksuvo
wrote: 7 days = 3,833 *10^9 years/(200 *10^9 stars of galaxy)? Since the powers of ten cancel, you are asserting 7 days = 3833 years/200 stars = 1916.5 years/star So you tell us why you think the calculation has any meaning. -- Remove del for email |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
3,833*10^9*years*365,2425 days/year /(200*10^9 stars) = 7 days
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
keskiviikko 28. tammikuuta 2015 8.46.48 UTC+2 Barry Schwarz kirjoitti:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:26:58 -0800 (PST), Ksuvo wrote: 7 days = 3,833 *10^9 years/(200 *10^9 stars of galaxy)? Since the powers of ten cancel, you are asserting 7 days = 3833 years/200 stars = 1916.5 years/star So you tell us why you think the calculation has any meaning. -- Remove del for email There was desimal point? So Evolution and Creationism are both true? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:17:23 -0800 (PST), Ksuvo
wrote: keskiviikko 28. tammikuuta 2015 8.46.48 UTC+2 Barry Schwarz kirjoitti: On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:26:58 -0800 (PST), Ksuvo wrote: 7 days = 3,833 *10^9 years/(200 *10^9 stars of galaxy)? Since the powers of ten cancel, you are asserting 7 days = 3833 years/200 stars = 1916.5 years/star So you tell us why you think the calculation has any meaning. -- Remove del for email There was desimal point? So Evolution and Creationism are both true? The age of the earth is currently estimated at 4.54 billion years, not 3.83. That yields an 8 day week. And the length of the year (measured in days) has not been constant over all those years. The number of stars in the Milky Way is estimated between 100 billion and 400 billion which yields a week anywhere between 16 days and 2 days. So yes, if you pull numbers out of the air, any assertion you like can be true. -- Remove del for email |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
the problem as cited by Ezra, Nostradamus, Kepler, Galileo, Copernicus, Newton ( religious) way before the atheists plagiarizer, Einstein, and Hawking, the solar year is not a constant thing, so 365.2425 ( or just a year ago or so) 365.24249 changes, and often drastically. So when the ancients claimed 360 days made up a year, this was perhaps true, and it is cited in ancient sources that precession has no mean nor accurate constant.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 11:32:37 AM UTC-8, Saul Levy wrote:
**** OFF, IDIOT! Saul Levy solley sat on her pink piggy and squashed it? Did the psychs give u the wrong meds again, turd for brains? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
keskiviikko 28. tammikuuta 2015 20.46.34 UTC+2 Barry Schwarz kirjoitti:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:17:23 -0800 (PST), Ksuvo wrote: keskiviikko 28. tammikuuta 2015 8.46.48 UTC+2 Barry Schwarz kirjoitti: On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:26:58 -0800 (PST), Ksuvo wrote: 7 days = 3,833 *10^9 years/(200 *10^9 stars of galaxy)? Since the powers of ten cancel, you are asserting 7 days = 3833 years/200 stars = 1916.5 years/star So you tell us why you think the calculation has any meaning. -- Remove del for email There was desimal point? So Evolution and Creationism are both true? The age of the earth is currently estimated at 4.54 billion years, not 3.83. That yields an 8 day week. And the length of the year (measured in days) has not been constant over all those years. The number of stars in the Milky Way is estimated between 100 billion and 400 billion which yields a week anywhere between 16 days and 2 days. So yes, if you pull numbers out of the air, any assertion you like can be true. -- Remove del for email Yes, but here have gone about 0,7 giga years, after that "creation".... And it is the summed time all over our galaxy stars? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is this calculation all right?
keskiviikko 28. tammikuuta 2015 16.50.11 UTC+2 Saul Levy kirjoitti:
YOU'RE A ****ING IDIOT, DUMBASS FINN! Saul Levy - But what YOURSELF are, Saul? Are you more ****ing idiot or less than us? + Quite disgusting speakings your are always here training. On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:17:23 -0800 (PST), Ksuvo wrote: keskiviikko 28. tammikuuta 2015 8.46.48 UTC+2 Barry Schwarz kirjoitti: On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:26:58 -0800 (PST), Ksuvo wrote: 7 days = 3,833 *10^9 years/(200 *10^9 stars of galaxy)? Since the powers of ten cancel, you are asserting 7 days = 3833 years/200 stars = 1916.5 years/star So you tell us why you think the calculation has any meaning. -- Remove del for email There was desimal point? So Evolution and Creationism are both true? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Guess how I did this calculation | Joe Snodgrass | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 13th 10 11:11 PM |
Sundial calculation help | Zero_G | Astronomy Misc | 1 | October 18th 08 11:04 PM |
ephemeris calculation | Gour | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 16th 08 09:42 PM |
Arclength Calculation | Jon | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 28th 04 10:06 AM |