Do the Milky way rotate vs the faraway fixstars, galaxies, nebulosas?

If so it measurable over 10 k years, 100 k years or million of years?

How many degrees? Is there a name for this celestial cycle and what is the rotational velocity for the outers bank of Milky way vs its center?

On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:46:15 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

If so it measurable over 10 k years, 100 k years or million of years?

How many degrees? Is there a name for this celestial cycle and what is the rotational velocity for the outers bank of Milky way vs its center?

If you google milky way rotation you will get faster answers (and
probably higher signal to noise ratio).

--
Remove del for email

Den måndag 26 januari 2015 kl. 09:22:44 UTC+1 skrev Barry Schwarz:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:46:15 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

If so it measurable over 10 k years, 100 k years or million of years?

How many degrees? Is there a name for this celestial cycle and what is the rotational velocity for the outers bank of Milky way vs its center?

If you google milky way rotation you will get faster answers (and
probably higher signal to noise ratio).

--
Remove del for email

Is milky way a pushing or sucking vortex?
If the neutron star in the middle of milky way was sucking in object would one not expect a redshift gradual redshift occur towards the center. And close at center things falling in so fast that we would see plenty of stars devoured everyday?

I do not think that the galactic center is sucking it is pushing things. And i am not talking about some weird dark energy just the vortex in itself. Isn't this what we see rather then a sucking vortex?

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hoIlZMKz1_o/hqdefault.jpg

It seem that astronomy and physics can not explain many phenomens outside the stellar realm.

Den måndag 26 januari 2015 kl. 13:10:00 UTC+1 skrev :
Den måndag 26 januari 2015 kl. 09:22:44 UTC+1 skrev Barry Schwarz:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:46:15 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

If so it measurable over 10 k years, 100 k years or million of years?

How many degrees? Is there a name for this celestial cycle and what is the rotational velocity for the outers bank of Milky way vs its center?

If you google milky way rotation you will get faster answers (and
probably higher signal to noise ratio).

--
Remove del for email

Is milky way a pushing or sucking vortex?
If the neutron star in the middle of milky way was sucking in object would one not expect a redshift gradual redshift occur towards the center. And close at center things falling in so fast that we would see plenty of stars devoured everyday?

I do not think that the galactic center is sucking it is pushing things. And i am not talking about some weird dark energy just the vortex in itself.. Isn't this what we see rather then a sucking vortex?

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hoIlZMKz1_o/hqdefault.jpg

It seem that astronomy and physics can not explain many phenomens outside the stellar realm.

"Idiots" at work suggest that the frame of reference at the time dilated galactic center can be observed from our frame of reference. No you ****ing idiots we can not observe time dilation as a physical process occuring at the galectic center from our frame of reference. It is their oscillation periods suffer time dilation not the processes occuring in space itself.

http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/711/1/157/article

On 26/01/2015 8:44 AM, wrote:
"Idiots" at work suggest that the frame of reference at the time dilated galactic center can be observed from our frame of reference. No you ****ing idiots we can not observe time dilation as a physical process occuring at the galectic center from our frame of reference. It is their oscillation periods suffer time dilation not the processes occuring in space itself.

Ho boy, the birth of another mental patient.

Yousuf Khan

Den tisdag 27 januari 2015 kl. 16:06:37 UTC+1 skrev Yousuf Khan:
On 26/01/2015 8:44 AM, wrote:
"Idiots" at work suggest that the frame of reference at the time dilated galactic center can be observed from our frame of reference. No you ****ing idiots we can not observe time dilation as a physical process occuring at the galectic center from our frame of reference. It is their oscillation periods suffer time dilation not the processes occuring in space itself.

Ho boy, the birth of another mental patient.

Yousuf Khan

Who care about what low IQ parrots with low spatial ability care to think.
Well not me, i don't care about average mind like yourself and Einstein end of that story.

Go play with your worthless math and astronomy, i don't care the people paying for it do not care either. Having anal obsessed little ****ers doing pettiful math manipulations is fun for a while but in the end it get just boring.

Keep doing it until you get a brain, oh **** i just realised it ain't going to happen. Bad luck.

Den tisdag 27 januari 2015 kl. 21:26:42 UTC+1 skrev :
Den tisdag 27 januari 2015 kl. 16:06:37 UTC+1 skrev Yousuf Khan:
On 26/01/2015 8:44 AM, wrote:
"Idiots" at work suggest that the frame of reference at the time dilated galactic center can be observed from our frame of reference. No you ****ing idiots we can not observe time dilation as a physical process occuring at the galectic center from our frame of reference. It is their oscillation periods suffer time dilation not the processes occuring in space itself.

Ho boy, the birth of another mental patient.

Yousuf Khan

Who care about what low IQ parrots with low spatial ability care to think..
Well not me, i don't care about average mind like yourself and Einstein end of that story.

Go play with your worthless math and astronomy, i don't care the people paying for it do not care either. Having anal obsessed little ****ers doing pettiful math manipulations is fun for a while but in the end it get just boring.

Keep doing it until you get a brain, oh **** i just realised it ain't going to happen. Bad luck.

You little ****ers should be glad that there is people within computer science that care to think about your anal obsession and try to straight things out with logic. otherwise you little ****ers would be playing with taxpayer money and wormholes and timetravel the whole days.

Den tisdag 27 januari 2015 kl. 16:06:37 UTC+1 skrev Yousuf Khan:
On 26/01/2015 8:44 AM, wrote:
"Idiots" at work suggest that the frame of reference at the time dilated galactic center can be observed from our frame of reference. No you ****ing idiots we can not observe time dilation as a physical process occuring at the galectic center from our frame of reference. It is their oscillation periods suffer time dilation not the processes occuring in space itself.

Ho boy, the birth of another mental patient.

Yousuf Khan

Face it you have a to weak mind for the subject.

To answer the qustion in the subject line, "for spiral galaxy disks,
yes, but not as a rigid body." Except near the galactic center, the
stars rotate with roughly constant _linear_ speed, meaning the
"galactic year" increases linearly with radius.

One resource I've recommended before is at
http://burro.astr.cwru.edu/JavaLab/R...main_BACK.html

Elliptical galaxies I'm not sure about. For a long time, there was
no clear evidence of any overall rotation, but that may have changed
in the last few years.

In article ,
writes:
If so it measurable over 10 k years, 100 k years or million of years?

The Sun's motion with respect to the radio source Sgr A* at the
Galactic center has been measured using Very Long Baseline
Interferometry. I'd have to look up the exact time time baseline,
but it would have been a few years. It's probably well over a decade
by now, giving much better precision than the original measurement.

--
Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls.
Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA