|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
My butt. They are purely hypothetical. But you've basically said that we MUST immediately perform an EVA to investigate the sounds. But you're not willing to actually justify it. I'm asking you, if those were the numbers, would you still be so singlemindedly insisting on an immediate EVA? If a fatal space walk is 1 in 10,000 thatrs pretty bad. of course the shuttles safety record is way worse. True. But the powers that be have determined that risk is worth the rewards. Is the risk of an EVA worth the reward? What are the odds of them finding anything? The bottom line, the risk that not looking, afterr having scherduled a look will be a PR disaster if something bad occurs.... Besides, when dealing with a unknown major noise thats repetive better safe than sorry shopuyld be the mantra/ BTW nowhere did I recommend a will nilly rush out the hatch. Just a pre planned spacewalk completing the one cut short by the suit troubles. Well before next july : : : My opinion is right |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
System to monitor heat panels could safeguard future spacecraft (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 15th 04 06:14 PM |
ISS On-Orbit Status, 20-02-2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | February 21st 04 02:59 PM |
ISS On-Orbit Status, 11-01-2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | January 12th 04 10:35 AM |
Pressure monitoring in station | BigSkier | Space Station | 2 | December 1st 03 04:19 PM |
WashPost: “Space Station Mission Opposed” | James Oberg | Space Station | 3 | October 23rd 03 01:10 PM |