|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
deuterium in Comets as proof of a 10 billion year old Earth? #183Atom Totality Theory
I wrote last night:
New information: In the above I have a conundrum to solve. The conundrum is why would Dirac Radioactivities create more heavy water in water of the Comets rather than in water elsewhere in the Solar System? In other words, why is Dirac Radioactivities increasing the nuclear content of water in Comets? I have to have some mechanism as to why Dirac Radioactivities makes Comet water special. I do not have that mechanism. CellWell1 is Sun and inner planets which is alleged to be 10 billion years old. CellWell2 is the outer planets such as Jupiter and Saturn and its satellites So I need to explain why there is more heavy water in Comets than Earth's ocean water. Could it be that Dirac Radioactivities creates heavy water at the same rate whether on Earth or Jupiter or a Comet and that only because of the age differences that such a density of heavy water wanes through time? If so, then heavy water is a proof of the Sun and Earth as 10 billion years old. So in this explanation, Dirac Radioactivities when it creates water molecules, it forms heavy water in the proportion that we observe on Comets. And Comets are part of CellWell2 of a younger age than Earth as 5 billion years. So that after 5 billion years in a 10 billion years old Earth, that the heavy water density shrinks to what we observe on Earth. So is there a 2 to 1 ratio deuterium density between Earth and Comets? --- quoting from http://www.americanscientist.org/tem...ssetid/14384/p... Earthly seawater contains 160 ppm of deuterium, an enrichment of eight times relative to the deuterium in the solar nebula. So we would expect the comets to be similarly enriched, no? No. As it happens, the water in the three bright comets-Halley, Hyakutake and Hale-Bopp-that recently swung past the Earth averaged about 320 ppm deuterium, an enrichment of 16 times over the deuterium in the solar nebula, and twice that found in seawater! How do we account for these differences? --- end quoting that website --- I still need to look up what the Europa deuterium density is. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
deuterium in Comets as proof of a 10 billion year old Earth?#183 Atom Totality Theory
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
CellWell1 is Sun and inner planets which is alleged to be 10 billion years old. CellWell2 is the outer planets such as Jupiter and Saturn and its satellites So I need to explain why there is more heavy water in Comets than Earth's ocean water. What does Deuterium have to do with getting the age of the Solar System? Deuterium is as stable as regular Hydrogen, there's no radioactive decay here. Yousuf Khan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
deuterium in Comets as proof of a 10 billion year old Earth? #184Atom Totality Theory
Yousuf Khan wrote: Archimedes Plutonium wrote: CellWell1 is Sun and inner planets which is alleged to be 10 billion years old. CellWell2 is the outer planets such as Jupiter and Saturn and its satellites So I need to explain why there is more heavy water in Comets than Earth's ocean water. What does Deuterium have to do with getting the age of the Solar System? Deuterium is as stable as regular Hydrogen, there's no radioactive decay here. Yousuf Khan Good question, and a complex answer. I may not have the answer tonight but should after some thought. So let us picture Dirac Radioactivities as creating all matter. It emits from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and we observe it as cosmic rays-- nuclei or protons and as cosmic gamma rays and all their descendent transmutations of particles. So as we have say protoEarth some 10 billion years ago as a dot-seed and where cosmic rays or gamma rays accumulate around this dot-seed slowly amassing more proton, neutrons, electrons of elements and compounds. And suppose for 5 billion years of Earth's steady accrection of Dirac matter that the ratio of deuterium to normal water is 320 ppm deuterium overall average. But then for the next 5 billion years of Dirac accretion of matter, for some reason the differential rate of Dirac new matter makes the ratio of normal water with deuterium overall decrease to that of 160 ppm. That is about the best I can do at this moment. And I am making a longshot bet, that the observed measure of deuterium to normal water on Europa or Io or Pluto or any of the bodies beyond Pluto will come in at the 320 ppm ratio. I have searched high and hard for information on deuterium for the gas-giant's- satellites and there seems to be no information on that deuterium ratio. Perhaps the obstacle with the outer planets and their satellites is that gaseous water is observed but no actual pools of water such as in a comet. I am obviously not privy to the details of measuring deuterium in comets versus Io or Europa or Jupiter or Saturn. My guess is that if it were measurable and comparable the data would say 320 ppm matching that of Comets. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
deuterium in Comets as proof of a 10 billion year old Earth?#184 Atom Totality Theory
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: Archimedes Plutonium wrote: CellWell1 is Sun and inner planets which is alleged to be 10 billion years old. CellWell2 is the outer planets such as Jupiter and Saturn and its satellites So I need to explain why there is more heavy water in Comets than Earth's ocean water. What does Deuterium have to do with getting the age of the Solar System? Deuterium is as stable as regular Hydrogen, there's no radioactive decay here. Yousuf Khan Good question, and a complex answer. I may not have the answer tonight but should after some thought. So let us picture Dirac Radioactivities as creating all matter. It emits from the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and we observe it as cosmic rays-- nuclei or protons and as cosmic gamma rays and all their descendent transmutations of particles. And so why are you changing the subject? Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
some questions about Comets, Binary stars #165; 3rd ed; Atom Totality(Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 21st 09 08:49 PM |
organizing the evidence from Earth to furthest galaxy #161; 3rd ed;Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 21st 09 12:25 AM |
basics-- what is "time" in an Atom Totality and the Plutonium AtomTotality layer as 6.5 billion years old versus the Uranium Atom Totality | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | June 16th 09 09:16 PM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |
Radio Deuterium Detected - Deuterium SETI Freq.'s Viable? | Jason H. | SETI | 2 | April 13th 06 01:25 PM |