|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
GR begets gravity begot from Newton's 1st Law is false, whereas gravity
I am rather bemused and ashamed simultaneously of myself. But I suppose
all good scientists have these sort of brain lapses of clear thinking. What I am talking about is why in the world did I ever need Knot theory to clear my mind as to what gravity is? Why could not my mind simple take the next step of seeing what gravity is, since I accepted the Atom Totality theory and that the Sun, planets and stars and galaxies were all tiny fragments of the last 6 electrons of 231Pu. And since galaxies and stars and planets are pieces of the mass of 6 electrons of 231Pu that the protons and electrons create a highly bent space which anyone can look up the geometry of electron orbitals. So pieces of electrons move in this bent space. And thus, there is no force of gravity because the electrons are moving in a bent space carved out by the Coulomb force. So why in the world did I need the crutches of Knot theory to make that clear in my mind? Perhaps Knot theory was a half step closer to getting me to see that clearer picture. So what was phony and false with past physics history on gravity? It means Einstein's General Relativity is phony and false because he ultimately relies upon a false foundation of Newton's first-law, the law of inertia, and that a body at rest remains at rest but if the body is in motion moves at a constant velocity in a straight line. Poor Einstein never had the Atom Totality theory and so all he could do is use this false idea of Newton's 1st Law. In an Atom Totality there is no such thing as constant motion in a straight line. There is no Law of Inertia. The Sun, planets, stars, galaxies are all tiny chunks of the 94 electrons of the Atom Totality. None of those pieces of the electrons moves in a straight line with constant velocity. So gravity is a ficticious force. There is no force of gravity of electrons to protons. Perhaps our modern measurement equipement is not delicate enough in any experiment to prove that no force of gravity exists inside of atoms, or even perhaps molecules or small objects. The force of gravity in an Atom Totality occurs or arises because the Coulomb Law is a force of attraction between protons and electrons. This bends the space where electrons and their fragmented pieces of mass reside and they follow that geometry in motion. So it is not what Newton or Einstein would come to think that mass attracts mass or that mass bends space and the motion of mass is in that bent space. No, those are false perceptions. The entire Cosmos is the bent space due to the Coulomb force of 94 protons on 94 electrons of 231Pu. And the planet Earth goes around the Sun because the Sun is a bigger particle of the 94th electron than is the Earth. And so the 94Protons in the nucleus of 231Pu bend the space around the Sun more than around EArth and thus EArth revolves around the Sun. I am disappointed that I needed the posts of Knot theory yesterday to the Internet for me to see that picture clearly. Disappointed because I pride myself with a highly logical mind and should have been able to envision that without Knot theory. I should have been able to see that Newton's 1st Law was wrong and that Einstein who based his GR on Newton's 1st Law was also gone astray into falsehood. You see, the Atom Totality makes the force of gravity as excess baggage. Ironic that Einstein dispelled Ether in Special Relativity as excess baggage, made the ether null and void. Funny how the Atom Totality makes gravity null and void. Makes gravity as just a Coulomb consequence. So there is a proof to the above, but whether modern physics is refined enough to carry out the task is a different matter. The test is that there is no force of gravity in the level of the inside of atoms and no force of gravity for small objects. Because gravity is simply the bending of space due to the 94 electrons and 94 protons of the 231Pu Atom Totality. The only reason mass plays a role in gravity is because every mass we check out is a piece of the 94th electron of 5f6. Disappointed because I should have made a post like this circa 1994 or thereabouts and not here in 2005. So what is next? Do I beat-up on Newton's 3rd law also, after vanquishing his 1st and 2nd laws? I doubt it because, strangely or mystically, Newton's third law is EM based-- every action has an equal and opposite reaction. It is part of Maxwell theory and has its root foundation in the idea that proton to proton repel and electron to electron repel. Newtons 1st law and 2nd law have no connection to Maxwell theory and history would eventually find them falsehoods. But his 3rd law was rooted in EM Maxwell theory and would thus survive forever. Because Maxwell theory is theory of Atomic Physics which is Quantum theory and which is the Atom Totality. Still disappointed that I needed that extra half a step to see the picture more clearly. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:31:46 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(most snipped) So there is a proof to the above, but whether modern physics is refined enough to carry out the task is a different matter. The test is that there is no force of gravity in the level of the inside of atoms and no force of gravity for small objects. Because gravity is simply the bending of space due to the 94 electrons and 94 protons of the 231Pu Atom Totality. The only reason mass plays a role in gravity is because every mass we check out is a piece of the 94th electron of 5f6. Let me outline several other proofs: Gravity is about 10^40 weaker than Coulomb force. That would mean the mass in the Cosmos is no more than the mass of 10^40 protons. So there would be a direct correlation of observable mass density to the mass density of electrons inside a plutonium atom. That means if the electrons inside a plutonium atom were shattered and turned into tiny particles of "electron fragments" it would match the density of mass of our observable Universe. So the mathematics of mass of electrons inside a plutonium atom would match the mathematics of mass density of galaxies and stars and planets. Thirdly, because the lobes of the 5f6 are highly curved with distance would bring an illusion, an optical illusion, of an acceleration. But it is not an acceleration it is simply that the lobes are too curved with greater distance and so we would think it was a spot of acceleration or "antigravity". Fourthly, the shape of electrons in orbit is mostly caused by the 94 protons coulombic force on the 94 electrons. However, there should be evidence of electron coulomb force of repel on other electrons. Fifthly, the insides of atoms often have nodes and 231Pu has alot of nodes, point nodes, planar nodes and should we observe a region of the night sky devoid of everything implies we are looking at a node of the 231Pu Universe. Sixthly, perhaps the easiest proof of the AtomTotality is that of variable increase of mass to astro bodies. Example is Jupiter which is increasing faster every day than any other body in our Solar System. That is because in an Atom Totality the growth of a body is caused mainly by the daily accretion of cosmic-rays of great energy such as 10^9 MeV and as high as 10^14 MeV. These particles come from the Nucleus of the AtomTotality. It means that at some antipodal point of the AtomTotality is a Jupiter look-alike planet that is growing in mass to become a twin star of an anti-Sun and atoms have to hold their symmetry so that our Jupiter has to increase in tandem. So once we get science projects focused on how fast Jupiter is increasing its mass relative to all the other bodies of our Solar System is a proof of the Atom Totality theory. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What about the PU-238 Explosive Space Modulator?
And how well would it fit in with your computations? "Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message ... Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:31:46 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote: (most snipped) So there is a proof to the above, but whether modern physics is refined enough to carry out the task is a different matter. The test is that there is no force of gravity in the level of the inside of atoms and no force of gravity for small objects. Because gravity is simply the bending of space due to the 94 electrons and 94 protons of the 231Pu Atom Totality. The only reason mass plays a role in gravity is because every mass we check out is a piece of the 94th electron of 5f6. Let me outline several other proofs: Gravity is about 10^40 weaker than Coulomb force. That would mean the mass in the Cosmos is no more than the mass of 10^40 protons. So there would be a direct correlation of observable mass density to the mass density of electrons inside a plutonium atom. That means if the electrons inside a plutonium atom were shattered and turned into tiny particles of "electron fragments" it would match the density of mass of our observable Universe. So the mathematics of mass of electrons inside a plutonium atom would match the mathematics of mass density of galaxies and stars and planets. Thirdly, because the lobes of the 5f6 are highly curved with distance would bring an illusion, an optical illusion, of an acceleration. But it is not an acceleration it is simply that the lobes are too curved with greater distance and so we would think it was a spot of acceleration or "antigravity". Fourthly, the shape of electrons in orbit is mostly caused by the 94 protons coulombic force on the 94 electrons. However, there should be evidence of electron coulomb force of repel on other electrons. Fifthly, the insides of atoms often have nodes and 231Pu has alot of nodes, point nodes, planar nodes and should we observe a region of the night sky devoid of everything implies we are looking at a node of the 231Pu Universe. Sixthly, perhaps the easiest proof of the AtomTotality is that of variable increase of mass to astro bodies. Example is Jupiter which is increasing faster every day than any other body in our Solar System. That is because in an Atom Totality the growth of a body is caused mainly by the daily accretion of cosmic-rays of great energy such as 10^9 MeV and as high as 10^14 MeV. These particles come from the Nucleus of the AtomTotality. It means that at some antipodal point of the AtomTotality is a Jupiter look-alike planet that is growing in mass to become a twin star of an anti-Sun and atoms have to hold their symmetry so that our Jupiter has to increase in tandem. So once we get science projects focused on how fast Jupiter is increasing its mass relative to all the other bodies of our Solar System is a proof of the Atom Totality theory. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | History | 0 | February 4th 05 11:06 PM |
GRAVITATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 13th 04 03:17 AM |
Gravity as Falling Space | Henry Haapalainen | Science | 1 | September 4th 04 04:08 PM |
Newton's Gravity | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | October 29th 03 12:33 AM |