A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 24th 10, 06:16 AM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 221
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero

nightbat

More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!

See:
http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html

Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.

Check and clear your lenses.

ponder on,
the nightbat

  #2  
Old March 24th 10, 03:07 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hagar[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,309
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team Officers One---Saul Zero


wrote in message
...
nightbat

More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!

See:
http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html

Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.

Check and clear your lenses.

ponder on,
the nightbat


During the past 4.5B years the Earth was frozen under a thick sheet of ice
at least 5 times and in all likelihood, it was also totally ice-free that
many times. These processes may have cause sea level variation of up to 1000
feet.
That's the inevitable course of Nature cleansing and ridding itself of those
pesky, polluting critters on its surface.


  #3  
Old March 29th 10, 09:47 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero

On Mar 23, 9:16*pm, "
wrote:
nightbat

* * * * * *More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!

See:
*http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html

Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.

Check and clear your lenses.

* * * * * *ponder on,
* * * * * *the nightbat


To go along with the global thaw of ice, there's roughly an equal
global amount of land erosion taking place, thereby doubling that
amount of ocean displacement, plus there's another factor of
thermodynamic expansion of our oceans that'll contribute 10% more
towards rising that ocean level (perhaps half offset by the area
expansion of our oceans over coastal and tidal wetland that'll have to
be further evacuated).

~ BG
  #4  
Old March 29th 10, 09:48 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero

On Mar 24, 6:07*am, "Hagar" wrote:
wrote in message

...



nightbat


* * * * * More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!


See:
http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html


Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.


Check and clear your lenses.


* * * * * ponder on,
* * * * * the nightbat


During the past 4.5B years the Earth was frozen under a thick sheet of ice
at least 5 times and in all likelihood, it was also totally ice-free that
many times. These processes may have cause sea level variation of up to 1000
feet.
That's the inevitable course of Nature cleansing and ridding itself of those
pesky, polluting critters on its surface.


Is that what all ZNR parrots are taught in brown-nosed clown school?

~ BG
  #5  
Old March 29th 10, 11:02 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero

On Mar 23, 9:16*pm, "
wrote:
nightbat

* * * * * *More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!

See:
*http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html

Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.

Check and clear your lenses.

* * * * * *ponder on,
* * * * * *the nightbat


That's only a loss rate of 230 km3/year via Greenland.

To go right along with the global thaw of such glacial ice, there's
roughly an equal global amount of land erosion that's always taking
place, thereby doubling that amount of ocean displacement, plus
there's another pesky factor of increased solar energy absorbing and
the subsequent thermodynamic expansion of our oceans that'll
contribute 10% more towards rising that ocean level (perhaps half
offset by the increased area of our expanding oceans migrating over
coastal and tidal wetland that'll have to be further evacuated).

Of course, if the lithosphere of Greenland keeps rising due to that
loss of ice loading, whereas that too displaces a significant amount
of ocean.

Good thing this global warming trend is just a silly ruse perpetrated
by those democrats and Muslims, as otherwise we might have ourselves a
little something to worry about.

~ BG
  #6  
Old March 30th 10, 04:13 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero

On Mar 23, 9:16*pm, "
wrote:
nightbat

* * * * * *More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!

See:
*http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html

Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.

Check and clear your lenses.

* * * * * *ponder on,
* * * * * *the nightbat


That's only a loss rate of 230 km3/year via Greenland.

To go right along with the global thaw of such glacial ice, there's
roughly an equal global amount of land erosion that's always taking
place, thereby doubling that amount of ocean displacement via melted
ice, plus there's another pesky factor of increased solar energy
absorbing and the subsequent thermodynamic expansion of our oceans
that'll contribute 10% more towards rising that ocean level (perhaps
half offset by the increased area of our expanding oceans migrating
over coastal and tidal wetland that'll have to be further evacuated).

Of course, if the lithosphere of Greenland keeps rising due to that
loss of ice loading, whereas that too displaces a significant amount
of ocean.

Good thing this global warming trend is just a silly ruse perpetrated
by those democrats and Muslims, as otherwise we might have ourselves a
little something to worry about, and otherwise as long as we're not
down to our last km3 of glacial ice, who gives a puck?

~ BG
  #7  
Old March 30th 10, 10:50 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero

On Mar 23, 9:16*pm, "
wrote:
nightbat

* * * * * *More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!

See:
*http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html

Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.

Check and clear your lenses.

* * * * * *ponder on,
* * * * * *the nightbat


That's only an average loss rate of 230 km3/year via Greenland, and to
go right along with the global thaw of such glacial ice, there's
roughly an equal global amount of land erosion that's always taking
place, thereby doubling that amount of ocean displacement via melted
ice, plus there's another pesky factor of increased solar energy
absorbing and the subsequent thermodynamic expansion of our oceans
that'll contribute 10% more towards rising that ocean level (perhaps
half offset by the increased area of our expanding oceans migrating
over coastal and tidal wetland that'll have to be further evacuated).

Of course, if the lithosphere of Greenland keeps rising due to that
loss of ice loading, whereas that too displaces a significant amount
of ocean.

Good thing this global warming trend is just a silly ruse perpetrated
by those crazy democrats and Muslims, as otherwise we might actually
have ourselves a little something to worry about, and otherwise as
long as we're not down to our last km3 of glacial ice, who gives a
puck? (obviously far too few here in Google/NOVA Usenet/newsgroups
honestly care about whatever has already happened, is currently
happening or about to happen to others)

http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html

The buoyancy of our lithosphere as based upon what’s directly below
(namely the mantel) is enough to make the ongoing removal of ~225
billion tonnes per year from Greenland quite easily measurable.

Btw; our Antarctic glacial ice mass loss should be at least half
again up to twice as much as Greenland, making the all-inclusive
global volume and subsequent tonnage loss or rather conversion from
solid to liquid at roughly 2 km3/day, plus whatever global erosion
that’s likely worth nearly the same volume. Gee whiz, what more could
possibly go wrong? (after all, we don’t ever here those Rothschilds
complaining one bit)

~ BG
  #8  
Old March 31st 10, 05:46 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero

On Mar 30, 1:50*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 23, 9:16*pm, "
wrote:

nightbat


* * * * * *More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!


See:
*http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html


Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.


Check and clear your lenses.


* * * * * *ponder on,
* * * * * *the nightbat


That's only an average loss rate of 230 km3/year via Greenland, and to
go right along with the global thaw of such glacial ice, there's
roughly an equal global amount of land erosion that's always taking
place, thereby doubling that amount of ocean displacement via melted
ice, plus there's another pesky factor of increased solar energy
absorbing and the subsequent thermodynamic expansion of our oceans
that'll contribute 10% more towards rising that ocean level (perhaps
half offset by the increased area of our expanding oceans migrating
over coastal and tidal wetland that'll have to be further evacuated).

Of course, if the lithosphere of Greenland keeps rising due to that
loss of ice loading, whereas that too displaces a significant amount
of ocean.

Good thing this global warming trend is just a silly ruse perpetrated
by those crazy democrats and Muslims, as otherwise we might actually
have ourselves a little something to worry about, and otherwise as
long as we're not down to our last km3 of glacial ice, who gives a
puck? (obviously far too few here in Google/NOVA Usenet/newsgroups
honestly care about whatever has already happened, is currently
happening or about to happen to others)

*http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html

*The buoyancy of our lithosphere as based upon what’s directly below
(namely the mantel) is enough to make the ongoing removal of ~225
billion tonnes per year from Greenland quite easily measurable.

Btw; *our Antarctic glacial ice mass loss should be at least half
again up to twice as much as Greenland, making the all-inclusive
global volume and subsequent tonnage loss or rather conversion from
solid to liquid at roughly 2 km3/day, plus whatever global erosion
that’s likely worth nearly the same volume. *Gee whiz, what more could
possibly go wrong? (after all, we don’t ever here those Rothschilds
complaining one bit)


Perhaps when Greenland loses another teratonne of its glacial ice load
(roughly another 4 years worth), it'll bust open at the top and create
the largest volcanic eruption ever recorded.

Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”


  #9  
Old March 31st 10, 07:55 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Loss Of Ice Mass Documented---Profound Science Team OfficersOne---Saul Zero

On Mar 24, 6:07*am, "Hagar" wrote:
wrote in message

...


nightbat


* * * * * More ice mass loss being documented while resident doubting
Thomas Saul remains in disbelief, help us Mother of Mercy already!


See:
http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html


Never have so few helped so many, the few, the real, the Profound
Earth Science Team Officers.


Check and clear your lenses.


* * * * * ponder on,
* * * * * the nightbat


During the past 4.5B years the Earth was frozen under a thick sheet of ice
at least 5 times and in all likelihood, it was also totally ice-free that
many times. These processes may have cause sea level variation of up to 1000
feet.
That's the inevitable course of Nature cleansing and ridding itself of those
pesky, polluting critters on its surface.


There's only an average glacial (slow-ice) loss rate of 230 km3/year
via Greenland, and to go right along with the global thaw of such
glacial ice, there's roughly an equal global amount of land erosion
that's always taking place, thereby doubling that amount of ocean
displacement via melted ice, plus there's another pesky factor of
increased solar energy absorbing and the subsequent unavoidable
thermodynamic expansion of our oceans that'll contribute 10% more
towards rising that ocean level (perhaps half offset by the increased
area of our expanding oceans as they spread/migrate over coastal dry
and tidal wetland that'll have to be further evacuated for obvious
reasons).

Of course, if that lithosphere portion of Greenland keeps rising due
to that continuing loss of ice loading, whereas that too displaces a
significant amount of ocean, as well as increasing the likelihood of
some terrific volcanic eruptions because of the substantial (multi-
teratonne) loss of cap pressure.

Good thing this global warming trend is just a silly ruse perpetrated
by those crazy Democrats and Muslims, as otherwise we might actually
have ourselves a little something to worry about, and otherwise as
long as we're not down to our last km3 of glacial ice, who gives a
puck? (obviously far too few here in Google/NOVA Usenet/newsgroups
honestly care about whatever environmental trauma has already
happened, is currently happening or about to happen to others)

http://www.physorg.com/news188580215.html
The buoyancy of our lithosphere as based upon what’s directly below
(namely the mantel) is enough to make the ongoing removal of ~225
billion tonnes per year from Greenland quite easily measurable.

Btw; our Antarctic glacial ice mass loss should be worth at least
half again up to twice as much as Greenland, making the all-inclusive
global volume and subsequent tonnage loss or rather conversion from
solid to liquid at roughly 2 km3/day, plus whatever global erosion
that’s likely worth nearly the same volume. Gee whiz, what more could
possibly go wrong? (after all, we don’t ever here those Rothschilds
complaining one bit)

What's the elevation of the Hagar trailer park?

~ BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
With Saul Asleep Science Team Can Undisturbed Converse About GlobalWarming [email protected] Misc 6 October 26th 09 08:08 PM
[Fwd: Profound Science Team Officer Bert Florida Tornadoes PredictionConfirmed] nightbat[_1_] Misc 16 March 13th 08 12:46 PM
US President Now Agrees With Profound Earth Science Team Officers nightbat Misc 6 January 31st 07 08:26 AM
Spaceman, Min, Warhol, Saul, And All The Earth Science Team OfficersIt's Just Like Old Times nightbat Misc 39 January 23rd 06 09:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.