|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Returning from the crypt and three first lights
This has been a long spell of no imaging for me. I last was able to image on
the evening of Jan 1 Since then I have been inundated with either bad weather, too many chores or international travel. Saturday things changed. I got to test the AP155EDF with the Proline 39000Mono finally under some decent skies. Seeing wasn't great but it was clear and dark. I used an Halpha filter and got this shot of the Rosette, a bit late in the season. I managed to get 14 x 15 minutes. It was first light for my new AP guidescope. I had a bad storm in January that blew over my system in its cover. The only things damaged when it hit the rain-soaked ground were the drawtube for the guidescope (since straightened and a replacement procured from AP) and the scope cover, that I had to cut in order to disassemble the system. The wind had no problem blowing over the system but I could not lift it as a single piece so I had to cut the cover in order to disassemble it. In the meantime a friend sold me his AP guidescope so now I have two of them. We had a newborn on Saturday morning. So this little fellow also had "first light" on Saturday. It was about 4-6 hours old when the photo was taken. The 39MP is a bit low on the QE side at 22% so at 3.5 hours the data is a bit thin. Still it is fantastic to have such nice resolution over a largish FOV. I get the same FOV with this AP155EDF/PL39KM as I do with the KAF8300 at 400mm or the KAF3200 at 300mm, but at much higher resolution. http://www.narrowbandimaging.com/ngc...LI_ha_page.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Returning from the crypt and three first lights
22%! I thought my 11K was inefficient. No wonder the filtered color
camera needed so much time. Tiny pixels don't have a big capture area then with a low efficiency things are slow. Sounds like there's a lot blocking each pixel. Still it takes a nice image given enough time. I figured the newborn was 4 legged. Wild turkeys can be a major pain here. I've wiped out several windshilds thanks to those guys. They flush from the roadside ditch and fly right into you. Lost to windshilds, a headlight and suffered several nasty dents. They seem to die like crazy yet we still have a zillion of them. They roost on my deck railing with their butts facing in so they cam make a hasty retreat. I guess I should just paint the deck white and be done with it. Of course the instant the season opens not one is seen. We used to have a zillion ruffed grouse and bobcat that fed on them. Then some DNR idiot decided to introduce turkeys in the prairie regions. They took well and then moved to the woods. They took over ruffed grouse territory so they are rare now. Bobcat can't seem to do well on turkey and their population has crashed along with the grouse. Grouse were never a people problem. Dumb as a post they will just sit in the road until squished but that doesn't create nasty repair bills and they don't turn decks and yards white. DNR sees it as a success story making all sorts of false excuses for the lack of grouse and bobcat while the public is screaming about the property damage the turkeys do. Sorry about all the storm damage. The thought of my stuff just under a cover wouldn't let me sleep at nights. Observatory was built to survive 120 mph winds (highest recorded that weren't in a tornado was 105 about 15 years ago. I'm still cleaning up downed trees from those storms, two a week apart. 105 and 101 mph at a neighbors official weather station. Time to get out the carpentry tools when time permits. I've only had less than a dozen imaging nights since September. But I still have a huge backlog to process. I'm still processing stuff taken back in July and August. Rick Richard Crisp wrote: This has been a long spell of no imaging for me. I last was able to image on the evening of Jan 1 Since then I have been inundated with either bad weather, too many chores or international travel. Saturday things changed. I got to test the AP155EDF with the Proline 39000Mono finally under some decent skies. Seeing wasn't great but it was clear and dark. I used an Halpha filter and got this shot of the Rosette, a bit late in the season. I managed to get 14 x 15 minutes. It was first light for my new AP guidescope. I had a bad storm in January that blew over my system in its cover. The only things damaged when it hit the rain-soaked ground were the drawtube for the guidescope (since straightened and a replacement procured from AP) and the scope cover, that I had to cut in order to disassemble the system. The wind had no problem blowing over the system but I could not lift it as a single piece so I had to cut the cover in order to disassemble it. In the meantime a friend sold me his AP guidescope so now I have two of them. We had a newborn on Saturday morning. So this little fellow also had "first light" on Saturday. It was about 4-6 hours old when the photo was taken. The 39MP is a bit low on the QE side at 22% so at 3.5 hours the data is a bit thin. Still it is fantastic to have such nice resolution over a largish FOV. I get the same FOV with this AP155EDF/PL39KM as I do with the KAF8300 at 400mm or the KAF3200 at 300mm, but at much higher resolution. http://www.narrowbandimaging.com/ngc...LI_ha_page.htm -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Returning from the crypt and three first lights
"Rick Johnson" wrote in message . com... 22%! I thought my 11K was inefficient. No wonder the filtered color camera needed so much time. Tiny pixels don't have a big capture area then with a low efficiency things are slow. Sounds like there's a lot blocking each pixel. Still it takes a nice image given enough time. the critical things that affect the QE on this one is the existence of a light shield between pixels that is a hold over from the one shot color (a method to avoid color crosstalk) and the fact that there are no microlenses. The one shot color sensor was the original design and was done for Hasselblad. Because of a very fast focal ratio and steep light cone, microlenses were ruled out. They have poor admittance angle on a CCD. when it came to making a monochrome version, they just didn't put the pigment in the filter array and left everything else the same as I understand it so there is a metal light shield between the pixels and there is a polymer over the pixels that is undyed filter array material, both hurting QE and wth no microlenses to help divert the light from hitting the light shield and focus it into the pixel I took a screen shot from a technical paper written by the design team at Kodak that explains most of what I said above. The light shield reduces the fill factor to 53% so that is the big part of the low QE. I'd estimate that microlenses could bring back as much as half of what is lost to maybe get you to 30-35% or so I figured the newborn was 4 legged. Wild turkeys can be a major pain here. I've wiped out several windshilds thanks to those guys. They flush from the roadside ditch and fly right into you. Lost to We have a lot of turkeys but I've not heard of them running into cars. We just enjoy watching them. It is novel to us city slickers! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Returning from the crypt and three first lights
Richard Crisp wrote:
This has been a long spell of no imaging for me. I last was able to image on the evening of Jan 1 Since then I have been inundated with either bad weather, too many chores or international travel. Saturday things changed. I got to test the AP155EDF with the Proline 39000Mono finally under some decent skies. Seeing wasn't great but it was clear and dark. I used an Halpha filter and got this shot of the Rosette, a bit late in the season. I managed to get 14 x 15 minutes. It was first light for my new AP guidescope. I had a bad storm in January that blew over my system in its cover. The only things damaged when it hit the rain-soaked ground were the drawtube for the guidescope (since straightened and a replacement procured from AP) and the scope cover, that I had to cut in order to disassemble the system. The wind had no problem blowing over the system but I could not lift it as a single piece so I had to cut the cover in order to disassemble it. In the meantime a friend sold me his AP guidescope so now I have two of them. We had a newborn on Saturday morning. So this little fellow also had "first light" on Saturday. It was about 4-6 hours old when the photo was taken. The 39MP is a bit low on the QE side at 22% so at 3.5 hours the data is a bit thin. Still it is fantastic to have such nice resolution over a largish FOV. I get the same FOV with this AP155EDF/PL39KM as I do with the KAF8300 at 400mm or the KAF3200 at 300mm, but at much higher resolution. http://www.narrowbandimaging.com/ngc...LI_ha_page.htm Mmmm.... Crispy!! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Returning from the crypt and three first lights
Richard,
you certainly got a good image in spite of the low QE. With the exposure times you are used to the low QE probably can be compensated for. Stefan "Richard Crisp" schrieb im Newsbeitrag m... This has been a long spell of no imaging for me. I last was able to image on the evening of Jan 1 Since then I have been inundated with either bad weather, too many chores or international travel. Saturday things changed. I got to test the AP155EDF with the Proline 39000Mono finally under some decent skies. Seeing wasn't great but it was clear and dark. I used an Halpha filter and got this shot of the Rosette, a bit late in the season. I managed to get 14 x 15 minutes. It was first light for my new AP guidescope. I had a bad storm in January that blew over my system in its cover. The only things damaged when it hit the rain-soaked ground were the drawtube for the guidescope (since straightened and a replacement procured from AP) and the scope cover, that I had to cut in order to disassemble the system. The wind had no problem blowing over the system but I could not lift it as a single piece so I had to cut the cover in order to disassemble it. In the meantime a friend sold me his AP guidescope so now I have two of them. We had a newborn on Saturday morning. So this little fellow also had "first light" on Saturday. It was about 4-6 hours old when the photo was taken. The 39MP is a bit low on the QE side at 22% so at 3.5 hours the data is a bit thin. Still it is fantastic to have such nice resolution over a largish FOV. I get the same FOV with this AP155EDF/PL39KM as I do with the KAF8300 at 400mm or the KAF3200 at 300mm, but at much higher resolution. http://www.narrowbandimaging.com/ngc...LI_ha_page.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Returning from the crypt and three first lights
"Stefan Lilge" wrote in message ... Richard, you certainly got a good image in spite of the low QE. With the exposure times you are used to the low QE probably can be compensated for. Stefan all QE means is time Stefan since the FOV is so big for any given focal length I can sort of compensate versus a mosaic. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Returning from the crypt and three first lights
Btw I just took a look at the 11 megapixel version. This is a spectacular
combination of detail and wide field, and very little noise can be seen. And the calf is really cute :-) Stefan "Richard Crisp" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... "Stefan Lilge" wrote in message ... Richard, you certainly got a good image in spite of the low QE. With the exposure times you are used to the low QE probably can be compensated for. Stefan all QE means is time Stefan since the FOV is so big for any given focal length I can sort of compensate versus a mosaic. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Returning from the crypt and three first lights
"Stefan Lilge" wrote in message ... Btw I just took a look at the 11 megapixel version. This is a spectacular combination of detail and wide field, and very little noise can be seen. And the calf is really cute :-) We like that calf we had an even cuter one born last month but it was a pain because it needed to be bottle-fed for about 10 days. Finally it figured out how to nurse its momma and is now doing great The one born on the weekend just worked out like they are supposed to: easy birth, very healthy calf that was immediately able to stand and nurse. By the end of the day it was running around with momma The full rez image is also reasonably noise free but it would benefit from 2x the exposure time I think a good tricolor Eline will take about 25-30 hours total: maybe 12 hours of sulfur, 8 hours of Oxygen and 6 hours of hydrogen This coming weekend I hope to get 2-3 hours each of sulfur and oxygen to start the 'tease' of what could be... I wish I would have been able to get this project underway in January but the weather wasn't cooperating. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Returning After A Few Years | Terratek | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 25th 07 09:16 PM |
returning interplanetary probe? | Jim Oberg | History | 1 | April 18th 07 08:01 PM |
Dr. Flipper (the cutest sock) Returning | Lomie | Misc | 9 | February 19th 06 05:56 PM |
SAH not returning WU and serving Fatal Error 100... | jon renner | SETI | 10 | October 28th 03 07:29 PM |