|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Wow! A movie about the effects of light pollution!
Those 1950's-style sodium vapour streetlights that pour light up into
the sky have got to GO! Now it looks worse, like LED's will be used in everything, including embedding in roads!! Things can only get worse. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/771241064/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Wow! A movie about the effects of light pollution!
Scammed Public wrote in news:2eb76192-0f6f-401f-
: Those 1950's-style sodium vapour streetlights that pour light up into the sky have got to GO! Now it looks worse, like LED's will be used in everything, including embedding in roads!! Things can only get worse. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/771241064/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PxjFqQE8rk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Wow! A movie about the effects of light pollution!
On Jan 20, 6:55*pm, Scammed Public wrote:
Those 1950's-style sodium vapour streetlights that pour light up into the sky have got to GO! *Now it looks worse, like LED's will be used in everything, including embedding in roads!! *Things can only get worse. LEDs have the potential to be of far lower output for more localised effect. Most outdoor lighting systems provide ridiculously high light levels to cater for the rapid loss in intensity away from the actual source. The high output is inevitably reflected off the ground into the sky. Smaller units also offer the chance to make them tightly directed in comparison with larger units. LED up-lighters would dazzle anybody in the locality so are unlikely to be popular. Surface embedding would be very unnatural and probably very unpleasant unless of very low output. Unless some form of wireless power supply can be arranged the cost and vulnerability of hard wiring trillions of embedded LEDS would be incredibly costly. Losses in hard cabling using low DC voltages could be very high. Making the advances in efficiency worthless. Series wiring would be even more vulnerable to weather and mechanical damage. I can see a desire to provide a gentle wash of light on buildings instead of the present, garish and energy hungry floodlighting. The ideal situation would be lighting which was (by law) responsive only to human or vehicular presence. Street lamps which switch on and off to pedestrian or vehicular presence provide potentially massive savings in energy costs.They also provide higher personal safety and security. It is long overdue that cars no longer have blinding, long beam headlamps. While still being expected to travel in opposite direction on a narrow strip of asphalt! Many of these headlights have more to do with styling accessories than carefully shaped beams to avoid dazzling oncoming drivers. Better car lighting could greatly reduce the need for street lighting. LEDS can provide for this need as anyone with a high power LED torch or bicycle light can attest. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are the Physiological Effects of Breaking the Light Barrier? | American | Policy | 1 | August 25th 10 04:05 PM |
What are the Physiological Effects of Breaking the Light Barrier? | American | Misc | 8 | August 24th 10 10:43 PM |
The very first presidential effort to ever address Light Pollution: AlGore.org Statement on Light Pollution | Ed[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | April 25th 07 12:30 PM |
Light pollution | Steve | UK Astronomy | 7 | June 12th 04 08:42 PM |
Light Pollution | Malcolm Stewart | UK Astronomy | 1 | April 28th 04 09:27 PM |