A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Astro Pictures
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UGC 6446 A Crab-Like Messed Up Spiral



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 3rd 16, 07:00 AM
WA0CKY WA0CKY is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default UGC 6446 A Crab-Like Messed Up Spiral

UGC 6446 is a low surface brightness, face on spiral in Ursa Major just under the bowl of the Big Dipper. Redshift puts it about 38 million light-years distant but Tully-Fisher measurements put it at about 51 million light-years. It is sometimes considered part of the Northern M109 Galaxy Group. If so that would favor the 51 million light-year distance so I'll go with that. That would make it about 55,000 light-years across its longest diameter. I'm measuring this diameter at 3.7 arc minutes while NED lists its size as only 1.25 arc minutes. Others say diameters up to 2.8 minutes. Yet I'm quite confident at my measurement. I can't explain the difference.

At its north end is what I take to be a star cloud but NED lists as a separate galaxy, SDSS J112641.92+534633.3. Often these are just star clouds. Sometimes NED indicates this other times it doesn't. Many other knots are listed as separate galaxies in NED. This includes the bright blue star-like knot east (left) of the core). That is listed as SDSS J112643.98+534449.8. Again no distance or other data but it is quite obviously part of the galaxy even if NED doesn't indicate this. I suppose this northern object could go either way. They have little on it and nothing that would help decide this issue. If a separate galaxy as it looks somewhat galaxy like but if so it appears quite distant. But if happens to be a true interacting companion then that could explain UGC 6446's long drawn out arm that reaches the bright blue star at the south end as well as the faint extended features. I doubt this however. I was hoping to find something on this but came up empty.

Most of the annotations are basic but one at the far left edge I've shown as */Q/UvS? This star-like object is listed at NED a first a star and then a quasar by the Sloan Survey and then as a Ultraviolet Source by the GALEX satellite. Redshift is by photographic means. While often rather accurate it can be misled in the case of some stars. If correct it is likely a quasar but it might be a very blue star in our galaxy. NED seems to prefer the idea it is just a star in our galaxy. Hence the question mark.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	UCG6446L4X10RGB2X10R.JPG
Views:	331
Size:	242.4 KB
ID:	6320  Click image for larger version

Name:	UCG6446L4X10RGB2X10R-ID.JPG
Views:	234
Size:	189.1 KB
ID:	6321  Click image for larger version

Name:	UCG6446L4X10RGB2X10R-CROP125.JPG
Views:	151
Size:	89.4 KB
ID:	6322  
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NGC 7673 and 7677 a messed up pair? WA0CKY Astro Pictures 0 December 28th 15 08:24 PM
ASTRO: NGC 271 a somewhat messed up barred spiral Rick Johnson[_2_] Astro Pictures 1 June 19th 14 10:14 PM
NASA is messed up:( [email protected] Policy 2 January 17th 11 06:31 PM
NASA TV messed up? [email protected] Space Shuttle 6 July 15th 05 03:15 PM
Stellarvue: Ed Ting messed up! CLT Amateur Astronomy 60 January 25th 04 03:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.