|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html Where's Venus hiding within Apollo missions 11, 14 and 16? Why are all the public simulators forbidden to include Venus as otherwise easily seen from our physically dark moon? .. - Brad Guth |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 24, 12:18*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote: When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. * Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! * *We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html Where's Venus hiding within Apollo missions 11, 14 and 16? Why are all the public simulators forbidden to include Venus as otherwise easily seen from our physically dark moon? Brad you're as bad as those cheezy Sci-Fi films that made all objects in space seem close to one another, so as to make space travel appear like terrestial travel. The moon, even if it were in between the earth and Venus and the earth were at inferior conjunction with the Venus; the moon would still 99 times as far away from Venus as it is Earth. Do you actually believe that the numbers of 260,000 miles as an approximate lunar distance and the inferior conjunction distance of Earth and Venus as 26,000,000 miles is some sort of CIA/MI5 ruse? These numbers are approximate for calculation purposes, but they clearly are accurate with a few percentage points and make the 1/100 ratio of moon distance/Venus distance to the earth accurate. Why would astronauts see Venus any better from the moon as we do other than the atmospere? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
Eric Chomko wrote: On Mar 24, 12:18�pm, BradGuth wrote: On Mar 22, 9:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote: When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. � Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! � �We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html Where's Venus hiding within Apollo missions 11, 14 and 16? Why are all the public simulators forbidden to include Venus as otherwise easily seen from our physically dark moon? Brad you're as bad as those cheezy Sci-Fi films that made all objects in space seem close to one another, so as to make space travel appear like terrestial travel. What's "cheezy Sci-Fi" about the regular laws of physics and the best available science that's peer replicated outside of NASA? The moon, even if it were in between the earth and Venus and the earth were at inferior conjunction with the Venus; the moon would still 99 times as far away from Venus as it is Earth. Do you actually believe that the numbers of 260,000 miles as an approximate lunar distance and the inferior conjunction distance of Earth and Venus as 26,000,000 miles is some sort of CIA/MI5 ruse? Lacking in brain food, are we? Is going way out of context the status quo norm for you? Where the hell did you come up with that silly "CIA/MI5 ruse" of yours. These numbers are approximate for calculation purposes, but they clearly are accurate with a few percentage points and make the 1/100 ratio of moon distance/Venus distance to the earth accurate. I agree, that Venus at times gets to within 100X the distance of our moon, thus you'll get no argument from me. CIA/MI5 are merely the official MIB in charge of all the cloak and dagger right stuff of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, of which includes the smoke and mirrors worth of those NASA/Apollo moon landing hoax aspects. Why would astronauts see Venus any better from the moon as we do other than the atmospere? How could they have missed something that has got such an impressive albedo of better than roughly twice that of Earth, and at times being easily within the same optical lens FOV, along with either including Earth and/or that of our physically dark moon? It would have been technically impossible for those unfiltered Kodak moments to have so entirely missed getting a darn good look-see of having included Venus, as having clearly recorded such upon that Kodak film with plenty of DR(dynamic range) to burn, so to speak. . - Brad Guth |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
Where the heck are all of those perfectly good NASA/Apollo moon
landing hoax topics going? It's as though this Earth is actually flat, whereas such topics and of their authors along with each and every one of those 700 boxes of our NASA/Apollo mission data just fell off the edge. Perhaps we should take a little reflective quiet time to fully appreciate upon the recent intellectual and anti-science imposed gauntlets of this Usenet topic/author stalking and science blockage, whereas instead of the truth we're seeing forced topic stacking of such wordy disinformation crapolla so that the general public or media doesn't get an honest wind or otherwise bother to look deep enough into this mainstream cesspool of Usenet, as to discover what's really going down the drain. It's exactly like the cloak and dagger worth of those NASA Apollo false or dishonest topics having those key search words of NASA, Apollo, moon landing and hoax continually included within each and every one of those phony postings of obviously bogus topics, that which also include naughty smut and porn related context, as clearly intended in order to cause automatic filtering of what public schools ever get to read, as well as to divert the honest research intentions of others, by way of those hidden or cloak and dagger means that essentially wash-out or force-purge all previous forms of perfectly serious related topics out of their Google/NOVA archives, and thus getting removed from their infowar and otherwise mainstream hype configured Usenet, so that only the mainstream status quo of topics in 100% support of government and of their faith-based NASA/Apollo side of this issue remains accessible to the public. Do yourself a basic favor by simply accomplishing a Google Usenet/ Group search of ' apollo hoax ' or try ' moon landing ' and then use the "sort by date" feature. It's downright funny, isn't it. In them good old days of applying this form of government and theological extremist oversight, or merely orchestrated clownism, as such this tactic was mainstream swarm like accomplished via witch and book burnings that achieved their form of mainstream damage-control trickery of that dark-side era, as well as if need be having put those of their own kind on a stick for yet another shock and awe worth of a faith-based PR stunt wasn't overlooked. BTW, my for-real phone of 253-8576061 and email of bradguth@gmail or bradguth@yahoo (among others) has always been answered by myself, so if you're not getting through or you believe that I'm not answering my phone or otherwise not reading or much less returning your email, it's simply not the least bit intentionally because of myself, but instead it's more than likely of those calls or emails of yours have been getting systematically intercepted, modified and/or diverted by those in charge, and otherwise skewed by those having the most to lose, especially if they're not doing their spook and mole like jobs at keeping the rest of us supposed village idiots snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return. If this bad situation of censorship that's clearly getting worse isn't exactly of what those global domination Zionists and of their puppet Hitler warlord (aka partner in crimes against humanity) had in mind, as having since been replaced by our very own warlord(GW Bush) and of his born-again faith of brown-nosed minions, then what the hell is? Seems via those presidential signings and of all those DHS powers of God has entirely excluded or having banished all others from taking proper action. Again, it's all very Third Reich and otherwise warlord and otherwise Old Testament of being Zionist global domination like. - Here's another good one for the old status quo gipper of remote Usenet censorship, and/or of robo-moderation that's oddly not getting the least bit opposed by way of those in charge of snookering and/or traumatizing humanity and our frail environment to death. In other words of my somewhat dyslexic wisdom, it seems that we few good-guys are the only ones telling it like it is. m...: (obvious MI5/CIA spook/mole) has this context to offer: The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...0677c2204ec90a It doesn't matter, rec.photo.digital.* just hashed this out. You might care to take a look at: Killing all posts from Google Groups "Killing all posts from Google Groups" seems all very warm and fuzzy Hitler or Zionist of yourself, isn't it. How about your mainstream status quo of faith-based warlords doing their usual book and witch burnings at the stake again, or at least good old waterboarding of those that post such obvious spam? Or how about their PACWEST of ISP backbone data services having terminated wide areas of dial-up access on behalf of whatever MI5/CIA is requesting. It's exactly as though those ENRON qualified executives were hired in order to pull off yet another sweet deal of packing our hard earned loot into their offshore bank accounts, by way of forcing dial-up users to go DSL, or else. Obviously our Usenet contributor "m..." and others of their incest mutated kind voted for GW Bush and company of brown-nosed clowns and minions, that would gladly kill off whomever for their next buck. I would argue on behalf of a basic robo-moderator function that could just as easily uncover and divert and/or extract such clearly spam posted crapolla topics to a similar named group, such as merely having the .spam added on, as in sci.space.policy.spam should work rather nicely without ever causing total censorship or author banishment issues. BTW, the best of our "Top 10 Space Conspiracy Theories" is still the ongoing NASA/Apollo moon landing hoax of our mutually perpetrated cold- war for profit and global domination century, yet oddly these topics of perfectly keen interest are in fact getting robo-purged from Usenet, replaced with officially posted spam that's bogus as well as such porn and smut loaded topics only sucks and blows, as clearly intended by those in charge. If smart folks as supposedly having all of "the right stuff" had in fact been upon the moon and having taken all of those thousands of unfiltered Kodak moments (from that physically dark as coal surface as well as from orbit), then do tell us where the hell Venus was hiding as of missions A11, A14 and A16? Of all the other sorts of gabi40, Clint Eastwood, susi40, susi40001, susi40006, mirror server, dlcz, kgkgjkgkgkfgk and perhaps countless other trash or spam topics getting forced into the Usenet stack, whereas oddly these silly clownish efforts of their mainstream damage- control do not seem to bother any of those in charge of this or any other Usenet group. Why is that? (seems rather Zionist, or worse, doesn't it) Are these clownish methods of stuffing or force-feeding such topics as faith-based approved, so as to intentionally block out or displace all others from the index worth of other legit topics, or is this Usenet group by group trashing tactic merely of something MI5/CIA approved? As much the same as our team of cloak and dagger wizards having terminated the robust portion of ESA'a Venus Express PFS instrument, it's yet another interesting note about our physically dark and nasty moon, in that all the supposed better science (far better off than anything NASA/Apollo or of anything NASA since Apollo) and of otherwise perfectly fine expertise of the JAXA/Selene mission is still after all of this on-orbit science is officially sequestered, as though forced into being taboo/nondisclosure within one of our NASA space toilets. (perhaps as parked right next to those 700 missing boxes of their Apollo moon landing hoax missions and of all those pesky Muslim WMD) In addition to what little I've discovered, and my having been trying within my best dyslexic encrypted ways to share this new and improved science about Venus and our moon for the past 8+ years and counting, it seems there's lots more to behold about good old Earth that's worth our knowing and sharing, such as the many interesting discoveries and subsequent topics within the following link: Archaeology Answers About Ancient Civilizations Indus River Valley Ancient Maps of the World Ancient India Civilizations Ancient China Civilization Egypt Ancient Gods Strange Pictures Dead Men's Secrets Lost Technology and more... www.beforeus.com Other than my having deductively interpreted via honest observationology as to what looks so perfectly intelligent/artificial of the Venus tarmac, township/community of large structures, plus the surrounding infrastructure and of that nearby bridge as looking so gosh darn rational, I can't be absolutely certain about such other intelligent life still existing/coexisting on Venus. However, at least the regular laws of physics and of the best available science can't possibly exclude such, because even us frail humans along with a sufficient degree of applied technology could make a go of it, especially as for representing ETs capable of getting ourselves to/ from Venus would in of itself offer more than sufficient technological expertise for safely accommodating an extended stay in spite of all that geothermally forced environment of Venus being so geologically newish, CO2/S8 vapor hot and otherwise downright nasty from the bottom up, and otherwise not as we've been informed as being entirely greenhouse roasted from the top down. The planet Venus has been losing its core energy at the rate of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold greater than Earth), because Venus is simply geothermally active and thus hotter than hell. .. - Brad Guth |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
Mythbustin' the Moon Hoax
"Update: I've been told the episode does not air April 25. The air date has not been set yet, but I'll make sure I announce it when it is!" · # Forreston 17 Mar 2008 at 11:55 am "I wonder if this will ever be aired. It would be interesting to find out what they prove or disprove. After seeing the air date change to TBA, I wonder just how much was a hoax!" http://www.duggback.com/space/Mythbu...anding_hoaxes/ Unfortunately, this forever ongoing infowar of supposed Apollo moon landing hoax Mythbustin' doesn't bother to cover several of the most important and easily peer replicated factors, that'll just as easily prove our NASA/Apollo wizards never set a human footprint on the moon. Remember, if they had absolute proof positive on behalf of all that's NASA/Apollo, as such it would have been mainstream published along with multiple peer replicated support that's entirely independent from any sort of NASA or other government loot or background moderation. Unfortunately, not even Google/NOVA is the least bit independent. . - Brad Guth |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIET missions
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote: .... We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked ..... Exactly, so don't get your hopes up. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 27, 12:54*pm, Michael Gallagher wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner wrote: .... *We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked ..... Exactly, so don't get your hopes up. But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far in between. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 27, 8:54 am, Michael Gallagher wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner wrote: .... We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked ..... Exactly, so don't get your hopes up. And you're telling us where and/or how our NASA/Apollo wizards with all of their "right stuff" managed to hide Venus? (obviously not, because technically such is impossible) What's your sorry excuse for the JAXA/Selene mission as having been made taboo/nondisclosure rated? .. - Brad Guth |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 27, 10:04 am, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Mar 27, 12:54 pm, Michael Gallagher wrote: On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner wrote: .... We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked ..... Exactly, so don't get your hopes up. But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far in between. Independent interpreted data that's peer replicated outside of your hocus-pocus NASA isn't a problem, and never has been. .. - Brad Guth |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Mar 27, 3:10*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 27, 10:04 am, Eric Chomko wrote: On Mar 27, 12:54 pm, Michael Gallagher wrote: On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner wrote: .... *We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked ..... Exactly, so don't get your hopes up. But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far in between. Independent interpreted data that's peer replicated outside of your hocus-pocus NASA isn't a problem, and never has been. Brad, do you think that the Russians, who have sent numerous probes and rovers to the moon, would allow the US nemisis to start/continue with an Apollo ruse without exposing the farce? What exactly do you want? If JAXA/Selene jibes with LRO, and proves that we did in fact put 12 white men on the moon, will you then repent? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax" | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 7th 05 01:38 AM |