|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars.
On Oct/19/2016 at 4:29 PM, Jeff Findley wrote :
In article , says... Space Elevator too ? Once the materials are good enough and can be produced economically in the quantities needed, why hell not? In the long run it would be a lot better than chemical propulsion. If you are talking about a space elevator for Mars, materials are not really a problem. Mars' lower gravity means existing materials should do. Phobos is more of a problem. Not a show stopper, an elevator anchored away from the equator could be done. Still Phobos is very inconvenient. The real reason why we aren't developing a Mars space elevator is that the traffic between Mars and space isn't high enough to warrant the investment. Alain Fournier |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars. | Serigo | Policy | 11 | October 19th 16 12:14 PM |
A smaller, faster version of the SpaceX Interplanetary TransportSystem to Mars. | Serigo | Policy | 14 | October 18th 16 02:58 AM |