|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceX Falcon 9 ? Possible Explosion
On 10/2/2013 10:50 PM, Brian Thorn wrote:
If the stage is tumbling (which could be a product of venting), it wouldn't be a streamer, it would be a pinwheel, which could easily look like a spherical cloud from the ground. And the forces from that tumbling could explain some of the extra bits in orbit that were reported. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceX Falcon 9 ? Possible Explosion
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Brian Thorn wrote to All: Where those other launches SpaceX launches? I've read elsewhere about speculation that a normal venting procedure should leave streamer trails or spiral trails, not spherical ones. BT If the stage is tumbling (which could be a product of venting), it BT wouldn't be a streamer, it would be a pinwheel, which could easily BT look like a spherical cloud from the ground. not to mention that if the vent port was directed at the earth, the cloud would ba aimed toward the observer while it expands which would also give the appearance of a 2D circular cloud (vs a 3D spherical cloud which we cannot tell from way down here on t )\/(ark -- | Remove .my.foot for email | via Waldo's Place USA Fidonet-Internet Gateway Site | Waldo's Place USA 919-774-5930 telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com | Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceX Falcon 9 ? Possible Explosion
Jeff Findley used his keyboard to write :
In article mn.0d657dda57f839f1.127094@snitoo, says... Jeff Findley wrote on 10/1/2013 : The latest I heard is that SpaceX is saying that the second stage did *not* "explode". In the technical sense that statement may be true. But, the empirical evidence would seem to indicate that the stage is now in several pieces and that it vented its fuel in a spherical pattern. I guess this isn't a reusable stage. Not yet. You do realize I was trying for [dark] humor? It's my understanding that the primary reason for relighting the second stage engine is because this is a capability needed for future payloads. It would also be needed, eventually, for reuse of the second stage, but SpaceX is focusing most of their "reuse" efforts on the first stage. This makes sense, because the first stage has 90% of the main engines of a Falcon 9. A serious answer is out of place in this subthread. ;-) /dps "but well done, none the less" -- Maybe C282Y is simply one of the hangers-on, a groupie following a future guitar god of the human genome: an allele with undiscovered virtuosity, currently soloing in obscurity in Mom's garage. Bradley Wertheim, theAtlantic.com, Jan 10 2013 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SpaceX: Falcon 1 Flight 4 | Damon Hill[_3_] | Policy | 17 | September 30th 08 08:02 PM |
SpaceX Falcon Lost? | Thomas Lee Elifritz | Policy | 11 | March 25th 06 08:50 PM |
SpaceX Falcon FRF Success! | Ed Kyle | Policy | 9 | February 21st 06 05:09 AM |
SpaceX Falcon 1 FRF!(?) | Ed Kyle | Policy | 79 | February 14th 06 09:21 PM |
SpaceX Falcon Ready to Go. | Ed Kyle | Policy | 50 | December 21st 05 02:46 PM |