A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SpaceX Falcon 9 ? Possible Explosion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old October 3rd 13, 06:35 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Vaughn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default SpaceX Falcon 9 ? Possible Explosion

On 10/2/2013 10:50 PM, Brian Thorn wrote:
If the stage is tumbling (which could be a product of venting), it
wouldn't be a streamer, it would be a pinwheel, which could easily
look like a spherical cloud from the ground.


And the forces from that tumbling could explain some of the extra bits
in orbit that were reported.


  #22  
Old October 4th 13, 04:47 PM posted to sci.space.policy
mark lewis[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default SpaceX Falcon 9 ? Possible Explosion


On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Brian Thorn wrote to All:

Where those other launches SpaceX launches? I've read elsewhere about
speculation that a normal venting procedure should leave streamer
trails or spiral trails, not spherical ones.


BT If the stage is tumbling (which could be a product of venting), it
BT wouldn't be a streamer, it would be a pinwheel, which could easily
BT look like a spherical cloud from the ground.

not to mention that if the vent port was directed at the earth, the cloud would ba aimed toward the observer while it expands which would also give the appearance of a 2D circular cloud (vs a 3D spherical cloud which we cannot tell from way down here on t
)\/(ark

--
| Remove .my.foot for email
| via Waldo's Place USA Fidonet-Internet Gateway Site
| Waldo's Place USA 919-774-5930 telnet://bbs.wpusa.dynip.com
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.
  #23  
Old October 9th 13, 09:54 AM posted to sci.space.policy
snidely
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,303
Default SpaceX Falcon 9 ? Possible Explosion

Jeff Findley used his keyboard to write :
In article mn.0d657dda57f839f1.127094@snitoo,
says...

Jeff Findley wrote on 10/1/2013 :

The latest I heard is that SpaceX is saying that the second stage did
*not* "explode". In the technical sense that statement may be true.
But, the empirical evidence would seem to indicate that the stage is now
in several pieces and that it vented its fuel in a spherical pattern.


I guess this isn't a reusable stage.


Not yet.


You do realize I was trying for [dark] humor?

It's my understanding that the primary reason for relighting
the second stage engine is because this is a capability needed for
future payloads. It would also be needed, eventually, for reuse of the
second stage, but SpaceX is focusing most of their "reuse" efforts on
the first stage. This makes sense, because the first stage has 90% of
the main engines of a Falcon 9.


A serious answer is out of place in this subthread. ;-)

/dps "but well done, none the less"

--
Maybe C282Y is simply one of the hangers-on, a groupie following a
future guitar god of the human genome: an allele with undiscovered
virtuosity, currently soloing in obscurity in Mom's garage.
Bradley Wertheim, theAtlantic.com, Jan 10 2013


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SpaceX: Falcon 1 Flight 4 Damon Hill[_3_] Policy 17 September 30th 08 08:02 PM
SpaceX Falcon Lost? Thomas Lee Elifritz Policy 11 March 25th 06 08:50 PM
SpaceX Falcon FRF Success! Ed Kyle Policy 9 February 21st 06 05:09 AM
SpaceX Falcon 1 FRF!(?) Ed Kyle Policy 79 February 14th 06 09:21 PM
SpaceX Falcon Ready to Go. Ed Kyle Policy 50 December 21st 05 02:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.