A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What is String theory?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 1st 05, 12:12 AM
dream machine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What is String theory?

Have ye any idea? Is it new to Astronomy???

Uncle Jav

  #2  
Old June 1st 05, 01:53 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrotw

dream machine wrote:

Have ye any idea? Is it new to Astronomy???

Uncle Jav


nightbat

It is non evidence based sci fi, like multiverse, parallel
Universes, worm holes, black hole infinite paradoxes, branes,
multistrings, Star Trek material. Have fun with it if you like it but
remember it is all non evidence based.

ponder on,
the nightbat
  #3  
Old June 1st 05, 02:38 AM
Bill Sheppard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From Nightbat:

It is non evidence based sci fi, like
multiverse, parallel Universes, worm
holes, black hole infinite paradoxes,
branes, multistrings, Star Trek material.
Have fun with it if you like it but
remember it is all non evidence based.


It posits some sort of vibrational underpinning to space, which at least
is a step in the right direction. oc

  #4  
Old June 1st 05, 04:00 AM
Twittering One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

~ * ~

String ~ !

Fret ~ !
Fret ~ !

Knot ~ !
Knot ~ !
Knot ~ !

Work ~ !
Work ~ !
Work ~ !
Work ~ !

Play ~ !
Play ~ !
Play ~ !
Play ~ !
Play ~ !

Perform ~ !
Perform ~ !
Perform ~ !
Perform ~ !
Perform ~ !
Perform ~ !

Bravo ~ !
Bravo ~ !
Bravo ~ !
Bravo ~ !
Bravo ~ !
Bravo ~ !
Bravo ~ !

Encore ~ !
Encore ~ !
Encore ~ !

"Core en mon Coeur, mon Cur Blanc ~ !
O, mon Cher ~ ! Mon Amour ~ !
Mon Petite Boi Le Bete ~ ! * ! * ! * !"
~ Twittering

"Rejoice ~ !
Rejoice, unto The Lord ~ !"
~ Folly

~ * ~
Blog, or dog? Who knows.
But if you see my lost pup, please bring him home!
I got Leon a brand-new bone.
_________________
http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo

  #5  
Old June 1st 05, 04:06 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Bill Sheppard wrote:

From Nightbat:

It is non evidence based sci fi, like
multiverse, parallel Universes, worm
holes, black hole infinite paradoxes,
branes, multistrings, Star Trek material.
Have fun with it if you like it but
remember it is all non evidence based.


It posits some sort of vibrational underpinning to space, which at least
is a step in the right direction. oc


nightbat

It does give us comforting non intrusive leisure time to
converse with the zero energy medium clueless and view the cosmos from a
much deeper different prospectus. Thankfully otherwise we would be
inundated by gut application seekers with no end in intruding of
inquiries of how we did it. Imaginative thinking is good but pure
fantasy speculative unanchored thinking is entertaining with no positive
applicability to real world application. The Mother of all comets the "
Black Comet " is my theoretical baby, and the Wolter presented donut
like outer Universe engine yours. We enjoin uniformly in principle while
remarkably distinct in nature of originality.

later oc,
the nightbat
  #6  
Old June 1st 05, 04:07 AM
Twittering One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tree ...
~ White Chalk

"From a Weeping Willow

Tree ...
Fallen leaves.
~ Black Chalk

  #7  
Old June 1st 05, 04:13 AM
Twittering One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Cello
Cia. Quartet's Fellow
Fowl Fancies Fanatics En Fancy Dress,

Fancier If Fancy ~ Free, Fandango From Fang's
Unrang Unsang Fantail, A Peacock's Fantasia Fantastically

Enflamed, A Far Cry From Fanwort,
A Faraway Farce The Farceur Flun Far, If Fairly
Far ~ Fetched

Not."
~ Merryvale

  #8  
Old June 1st 05, 09:27 AM
Ray Vingnutte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 31 May 2005 19:53:30 -0500
nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrotw

dream machine wrote:

Have ye any idea? Is it new to Astronomy???

Uncle Jav


nightbat

It is non evidence based sci fi, like multiverse, parallel
Universes, worm holes, black hole infinite paradoxes, branes,
multistrings, Star Trek material. Have fun with it if you like it but
remember it is all non evidence based.


Or maybe not sci fi, if recent suggestion that GR fails at large scales
of the universe and string(M) theory can explain where GR fails then at
last there may be observational evidence for it.


ponder on,
the nightbat

  #9  
Old June 1st 05, 09:40 AM
Twittering One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mourning Becomes Electra's
Shock ~ Grieving Becomes Me, Know ~ ?
Mournen Would Select Me,
Inspector

Clematis Claims My Burberry's
Rein, Better Than Most, So,
Alas,
Alors ...

"Remember to change your light bulb,
From blew to red, better than dead,

Or asphYxiated, X ~ ilated, or aspirated,
If you've not already done so. Prevention's

Cure butters better
Both sides of your bread, or else you're toast,
Or Roast Childe, stuffed, tied,
And quartered!"
~ Axelated Isomer

"O, Astro ~ Glide's better
Than butter any day, or even Crisco, although
That's what Jody employed."
~ Twittering

Electra
Paradox ~ Knocks ~

"Entr=E9e ~ !"
~ Twittering

"A logical paradox arises
When the possibility

Of somebody knowing something's true
When described one way,

But reveals not when described
Another Way."
~ Capsicum

Electra
Paradox ~ Knocks ~

"Entr=E9e ~ !"
~ Capsicum

"A paradoxical logic arises
From my possibility,


I am somebody knowing that something's true.
When described one way,

I am not, but when described=20
Another Way,

I am me."
~ Twittering

  #10  
Old June 1st 05, 11:38 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Ray Vingnutte wrote:

On Tue, 31 May 2005 19:53:30 -0500
nightbat wrote:

nightbat wrotw

dream machine wrote:

Have ye any idea? Is it new to Astronomy???

Uncle Jav


nightbat

It is non evidence based sci fi, like multiverse, parallel
Universes, worm holes, black hole infinite paradoxes, branes,
multistrings, Star Trek material. Have fun with it if you like it but
remember it is all non evidence based.

ponder on,
the nightbat



Ray
Or maybe not sci fi, if recent suggestion that GR fails at large scales
of the universe and string(M) theory can explain where GR fails then at
last there may be observational evidence for it.


nightbat

Maybe means a pile of beans of hot air in science Officer Ray.
There is no observational evidence for string or M membrane theory,
none. GR has never failed in all the applied tests it has been subjected
to, empirical evidence rules. Last macro bastion of scrutiny is within
testable perimeters of gravity affinity, see Uncle Al, sci.physics
newsgroup, for presentation proposed experiment. GR never fails to date
at large applied macro scales it is in the quantum uncertainty realm
where there is still open question. The failure of M theory is in
necessity on 11 theoretical hyper dimensions non evidenced based
including multiverse dependence to hopefully close gravitational loop.
Maybes are free but subjected peer reviewed confirming non falsifying
empirical evidence remains self evident to co-affirming objective
scrutiny.

carry on,
the nightbat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Gravitational Instability Theory on the Formation of the Universe Br Dan Izzo Policy 6 September 7th 04 09:29 PM
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory Br Dan Izzo Astronomy Misc 0 August 31st 04 02:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.