|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why is Light NOT Ballistic?
We hear plenty of arguments against the Ballistic Theory of Light yet, to date,
nobody has produced a good physical reason as to how or why photons emitted from two remote and unconnected galaxies should instantly find a common speed towards one insignificant little planet called Earth. Since the unproven assumption "that all starlight moves at precisely the same speed c in planet Earth's frame" is critical to the whole of astronomical theory and since the OWLS of starlight has never been measured, isn't it time somebody had a closer look into the possibility that the assumption is completely wrong? If anyone is interested in a serious discussion about this vital subject, they might start by reading my discriptive thesis that sums up a twenty years investigation into variable star behavior and puts forward a strong case for the source dependency of light speed. It presents a radical revision of Ballistic Theory including several major modifications that have the potential to revolutionize astronomy and make it even more fascinating. The paper can be seen at: www.scisite.info/why_not_ballistic.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The New Ballistic Theory of Light | Henry Wilson DSc | Astronomy Misc | 19 | March 6th 11 03:22 AM |
Vega as ballistic missile? | Doug Freyburger | Policy | 9 | February 1st 10 03:07 PM |
Vega as ballistic missile? | David Spain | Policy | 4 | January 25th 10 05:57 AM |
The Modern Ballistic Theory of Light. | Henri Wilson | Astronomy Misc | 144 | October 14th 07 01:24 AM |
There is very little probability of another ballistic landing | Nicholas Fitzpatrick | Space Station | 9 | November 5th 03 01:18 AM |