A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old June 22nd 03, 05:27 AM
Lisa Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
On 21 Jun 2003 09:36:55 -0700, (Lisa
Gardner) wrote:

DrPostman wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 17:36:32 -0700, "John Griffin"
wrote:


"DrPostman" wrote
On 20 Jun 2003 11:01:30 -0700,
(Lisa
Gardner) wrote:

Guy, I meant that I am not so ready to believe *Nancy's*
assertion.

How can you be ready AT ALL to believe it, especially now that
her dates have come and gone and The White Lie is the excuse?

Lisa wants to believe crazy stuff, as a sort of solidarity thing.


Uh, what is with you guys?

Are you functioning on auto-reply, or something?

**Did you actually read what I wrote above**?

I said that I was not too willing to believe this assertion of
Nancy's.


And did you read what I asked? How can you be willing AT ALL
to believe Nancy's nonsense?


Somehow that got translated into me wholeheartedly believing.


Not from my question. What tiny, itty bitsy part are you willing to
believe? She has been proven entirely wrong.

[...]

Uh, actually. I don't believe any of it straight out, but it is
possible that she is looking psychically at someone's 'inner space'
and misinterpreting what she senses there.

Or, it is possible that she is being fed bull**** by people who
are intentionally looking to decieve and lead others astray.

Incidentally, I can't believe you gave this bull**** answer. How
is it that you can give such unthinking replies and still be
taken somewhat seriously? Or are you just not taken seriously?

Lisa Agnes Gardner
  #3  
Old June 22nd 03, 03:56 PM
Idon't
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?

STAPLETONSASTROLOGY wrote in message ...
Lisa Gardner wrote:

]

I have never really looked much into her stuff, but in general
I do believe that channeling is a part of the whole bad of ****
that eats at me. I also believe that it is possible that many
so-called channelers are really just people who are having
fed to them public opinion management propaganda by some
organization or another, either from here here on earth or elsewhere,
albeit through psychic communication.

What matters is the content of what is said, though. If the stuff
makes sense and seems right to you, than its origin is not all that
important. The *content* is what should be paid attention to.

If it *doesn't* make sense, than it doesn't make sense - no matter
who claims to be channeling whom.

But yeah: the whole phenomenon of 'channeling' is something
that could easily be used to direct the opinions of the certain
groups of people. I think it *is* used to do such a thing.


Lisa, "chaneling" is just some made-up-bull**** done to impress people,
get attention, and make money.

It's not real. It's fake. It doesn't really happen.

It would be cool it it were real, but it isn't. Sorry.


Yes, some of it is fake. However, I have known several channels
personally who were not "faking" it. Exactly what the process consists
of is open for debate, but it is not always being "faked".

I
  #4  
Old June 22nd 03, 04:15 PM
Ugly Bob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?


"Idon't" wrote in message
m...
STAPLETONSASTROLOGY wrote in message

...
Lisa Gardner wrote:

]

I have never really looked much into her stuff, but in general
I do believe that channeling is a part of the whole bad of ****
that eats at me. I also believe that it is possible that many
so-called channelers are really just people who are having
fed to them public opinion management propaganda by some
organization or another, either from here here on earth or elsewhere,
albeit through psychic communication.

What matters is the content of what is said, though. If the stuff
makes sense and seems right to you, than its origin is not all that
important. The *content* is what should be paid attention to.

If it *doesn't* make sense, than it doesn't make sense - no matter
who claims to be channeling whom.

But yeah: the whole phenomenon of 'channeling' is something
that could easily be used to direct the opinions of the certain
groups of people. I think it *is* used to do such a thing.


Lisa, "chaneling" is just some made-up-bull**** done to impress people,
get attention, and make money.

It's not real. It's fake. It doesn't really happen.

It would be cool it it were real, but it isn't. Sorry.


Yes, some of it is fake. However, I have known several channels
personally who were not "faking" it. Exactly what the process consists
of is open for debate, but it is not always being "faked".

I


How could one verify if it were possible or not? It's just
a buncha talk.

-Ugly Bob


  #7  
Old June 22nd 03, 09:41 PM
Lisa Agnes Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?


"STAPLETONSASTROLOGY" wrote in message
...
Lisa Gardner wrote:

]

I have never really looked much into her stuff, but in general
I do believe that channeling is a part of the whole bad of ****
that eats at me. I also believe that it is possible that many
so-called channelers are really just people who are having
fed to them public opinion management propaganda by some
organization or another, either from here here on earth or elsewhere,
albeit through psychic communication.

What matters is the content of what is said, though. If the stuff
makes sense and seems right to you, than its origin is not all that
important. The *content* is what should be paid attention to.

If it *doesn't* make sense, than it doesn't make sense - no matter
who claims to be channeling whom.

But yeah: the whole phenomenon of 'channeling' is something
that could easily be used to direct the opinions of the certain
groups of people. I think it *is* used to do such a thing.


Lisa, "chaneling" is just some made-up-bull**** done to impress people,
get attention, and make money.

It's not real. It's fake. It doesn't really happen.

It would be cool it it were real, but it isn't. Sorry.


[filler








filler]

****************************
'filler' is there to get around restrictions on quoted text being less than
new text.
I like to include the full text of the quoted article these days so that if
someone's
message experiences bad propagation for certain reasons, the quoted version
of
it can get through in my message, which might experience better propagation.

I may stop doing this if it gets to be a problem, though. Or maybe I will
just
start including a large .sig file.

*********************

If you are going to be impressed should someone prove to you that *it is
real*, i.e., that is *really is happening via physic channels* and isn't
just
'made up', than you might be a bad place to excercise caution with regards
to it should this turn out to be the case.

IMHO, the CIA or other agencies might even be able to 'broadcast'
bull**** psychically. This might impress the **** out of many impressionable
people who did not believe beforehand in the possibility of such stuff
but who will be blown away when and if it ever is **proven** to them
that such things are possible.

Lisa Agnes Gardner




  #8  
Old June 22nd 03, 09:42 PM
Lisa Agnes Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is TT-Watch uncontrolled now?


"DrPostman" wrote in message
...
On 21 Jun 2003 20:26:10 -0700, (Lisa
Gardner) wrote:



I have never really looked much into her stuff, but in general
I do believe that channeling is a part of the whole bad of ****
that eats at me. I also believe that it is possible that many
so-called channelers are really just people who are having
fed to them public opinion management propaganda by some
organization or another, either from here here on earth or elsewhere,
albeit through psychic communication.


Or it could be just another case of schizophrenia.

Yes. And there could be interesting things going on with schizophrenia.

What matters is the content of what is said, though. If the stuff
makes sense and seems right to you, than its origin is not all that
important. The *content* is what should be paid attention to.


Jim Jones had a lot of content that seemed right to his followers.


However, I was not one of them and I don't think it would have
seemed right to me.

If it *doesn't* make sense, than it doesn't make sense - no matter
who claims to be channeling whom.

But yeah: the whole phenomenon of 'channeling' is something
that could easily be used to direct the opinions of the certain
groups of people. I think it *is* used to do such a thing.


Or it could be the delusional following delusions.[...]


Yes, it could. But then, so could other things.

Lisa Agnes Gardner

[filler









filler]

The above is here so that the article will post with the amount of quoted
text
I have here. I don't want to cut any of the quoted text out.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whose fault will uncontrolled Hubble re-entry be? Explorer8939 Policy 2 February 24th 04 05:19 AM
NASA Watch doesn't like Rand's columns... jeff findley Policy 159 November 3rd 03 01:11 AM
The Mystery of Buzz's Lost (and found?) Moon Watch wassup History 5 November 2nd 03 03:56 PM
NASA Keeps Watch Over Isabel, Captures Spectacular Images Ron Baalke Space Station 0 September 16th 03 03:53 AM
NASA Watch: Early Shuttle Retirement? ed kyle Space Shuttle 0 August 29th 03 08:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.