|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No escape tower on Dragon / Falcon 9
On Sep 29, 11:05*pm, Jochem Huhmann wrote:
writes: "the company is considering replacing the escape tower with an integrated escape system using propellant intended for deorbit, “because you’re going to want to escape or deorbit, but not both,” Musk noted." Straight thinking, but a bit too straight... These are very different scenarios: In one you want the capsule to move away from an exploding booster as fast as possible, with very little need for an exact trajectory, and in the other you want a rather gentle, but very precise firing. Deorbiting by getting a hell of a kick in the butt with 20g is not exactly what you want anyway. So use an adequate number of smaller motors. For escape, fire them all at once. For de-orbit, fire a few at a time, symmetrically- positioned. Since escape thrust should be reliably survivable, and de-orbit acceleration can be at least as great as average ascent acceleration, the total number of motors need not be large. Align the motors through the centre of gravity, so that if one fails to light the capsule is not made to spin and is sent not far off- course. -- (c) John Stockton, near London, UK. Posting with Google. Mail: or (better) via Home Page at Web: URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ FAQish topics, acronyms, links, etc.; Date, Delphi, JavaScript, ....| |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No escape tower on Dragon / Falcon 9 | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | September 30th 08 03:43 PM |
Why wasn't escape tower used on Gemini? | [email protected] | History | 74 | December 4th 06 12:35 AM |
Escape Tower on Mercury | Von Fourche | History | 7 | March 13th 06 07:31 PM |
Apollo Style Escape Tower Question.... | Richard Stewart | History | 13 | January 19th 04 07:58 PM |