Evidence of Ancient Archaeoastronomy On Mars? Sleuths?

"The Pleiades constellation has a venerable tradition among "New Age"
media. Now an independent discovery suggests that the seven stars might
be represented on the Martian surface. Lynsay Watson has noticed a
number of correspondences between the Pleiades and the "City" area in
Cydonia."

Mo

http://www.mactonnies.com/imperative44.html

More evidence can be viewed he

http://www.grahamhancock.com/gallery...er/default.htm

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:29:18 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote:

"The Pleiades constellation has a venerable tradition among "New Age"
media. Now an independent discovery suggests that the seven stars might
be represented on the Martian surface. Lynsay Watson has noticed a
number of correspondences between the Pleiades and the "City" area in
Cydonia."

Mo

http://www.mactonnies.com/imperative44.html


Is this all you do all day? Look for goofy stuff to post?

Tom Randy wrote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:29:18 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote:


"The Pleiades constellation has a venerable tradition among "New Age"
media. Now an independent discovery suggests that the seven stars might
be represented on the Martian surface. Lynsay Watson has noticed a
number of correspondences between the Pleiades and the "City" area in
Cydonia."

Mo

http://www.mactonnies.com/imperative44.html



Is this all you do all day? Look for goofy stuff to post?


Is this all you do all day is look for people to harass sociopath?

Tom Randy wrote in
news
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:29:18 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote:

"The Pleiades constellation has a venerable tradition among "New Age"
media. Now an independent discovery suggests that the seven stars might
be represented on the Martian surface. Lynsay Watson has noticed a
number of correspondences between the Pleiades and the "City" area in
Cydonia."

Mo

http://www.mactonnies.com/imperative44.html

Look, dimwit (I mean MS, not you, Tom),

The Pleiades is way more than 7 stars. There are not 7 visible stars,
there are 6, unless you have exceptional eyesight, in which case there are
at least 8, since the 7th and 8th have the same magnitude. In even a small
scope you can easily come up with close to 50 stars. So, since he can
pretty much pick any number (except 7) between 6 and 50 and be right, it's
pretty pathetic that he picks the one number that is almost certainly
wrong.

Time to crawl back under your rock.

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...


Tom Randy wrote:

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:29:18 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote:


"The Pleiades constellation has a venerable tradition among "New Age"
media. Now an independent discovery suggests that the seven stars might
be represented on the Martian surface. Lynsay Watson has noticed a
number of correspondences between the Pleiades and the "City" area in
Cydonia."

Mo

http://www.mactonnies.com/imperative44.html



Is this all you do all day? Look for goofy stuff to post?


Is this all you do all day is look for people to harass sociopath?

Is that all you do all day? Call people who disagree with you sociopaths?

Awww poor sociopath, still expects to dialog with humanity while
expressing the faculties of a barking dog.

Paul Lawler wrote:

Tom Randy wrote in
news

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:29:18 +0000, Mad Scientist wrote:


"The Pleiades constellation has a venerable tradition among "New Age"
media. Now an independent discovery suggests that the seven stars might
be represented on the Martian surface. Lynsay Watson has noticed a
number of correspondences between the Pleiades and the "City" area in
Cydonia."

Mo

http://www.mactonnies.com/imperative44.html


Look, dimwit (I mean MS, not you, Tom),

The Pleiades is way more than 7 stars. There are not 7 visible stars,
there are 6, unless you have exceptional eyesight, in which case there are
at least 8, since the 7th and 8th have the same magnitude. In even a small
scope you can easily come up with close to 50 stars. So, since he can
pretty much pick any number (except 7) between 6 and 50 and be right, it's
pretty pathetic that he picks the one number that is almost certainly
wrong.

Time to crawl back under your rock.

TVNI wrote:


Is this all you do all day is look for people to harass sociopath?


Is that all you do all day? Call people who disagree with you sociopaths?

LOL Hardly, that's a tactic done all too frequently by the usenet
sociopaths. Merely calling a spade a spade there dummy.

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...


TVNI wrote:


Is this all you do all day is look for people to harass sociopath?


Is that all you do all day? Call people who disagree with you
sociopaths?

LOL Hardly, that's a tactic done all too frequently by the usenet
sociopaths. Merely calling a spade a spade there dummy.


I have to say one thing about you MS, I haven't been coming to this
newsgroup long, but you certainly make the place enjoyable with your lack of
understanding of basic scientific principles.

The signpost up ahead doesn't say Twilight Zone, it says "Clueville,
Population: everyone but you."

Another usenet sociopath responds with the same nonsense.

TVNI wrote:

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
.cable.rogers.com...


TVNI wrote:



Is this all you do all day is look for people to harass sociopath?


Is that all you do all day? Call people who disagree with you

sociopaths?

LOL Hardly, that's a tactic done all too frequently by the usenet
sociopaths. Merely calling a spade a spade there dummy.



I have to say one thing about you MS, I haven't been coming to this
newsgroup long, but you certainly make the place enjoyable with your lack of
understanding of basic scientific principles.

The signpost up ahead doesn't say Twilight Zone, it says "Clueville,
Population: everyone but you."