Aether has mass

On Nov 12, 4:59*pm, American wrote:

Uh, yeah, Brad, it kind of IS a holy grail of Physics, because you're
leaving out anything else that does not get included with a single
aether, which is also multiple universe theory. Some are even
speculating that the B.B. was a result of the intersection of two
universes, but one would have to consult Wheeler for that.

The idea that I get from MPC755, is that aether and matter are
completely separable, which would be nice if there was a limit to
quantum field theory. Since the theory is still in its infancy, one
can only speculate as to what aether DOESN'T consist of, and then
pretend that whatever is not yet known as the quantum field, or
quantum particles for that matter, is pushing back on whatever we can
label "mass". But we're only validating more of the 'spooky action at
a distance', manifested by things like quantum entanglement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

What I'd rather propose is a general theory that eliminates the spooky
action altogether, and replaces it with a different kind of duality
action between the two, i.e. unipolar particles, that can exhibit a
photon time dilation per unit wavelength, or quantity of TIME-space
COMPRESSION for SPACE-time EXPANSION, or even vice versa, within an
interuniversally exchanging medium of mass resonance.

The only waves that can achieve this phenomenon across the surface of
a superconductor are the phonons, IMO.

There is no such thing as entanglement. Downconverted photon pairs are
created as exact opposite with exact opposite angular momentums. They
are detected with certain spins because they are created that way. No
entanglement. No hidden variables. No spooky action at a distance.
Conservation of momentum of the original photon means the
downconverted photon pair have exact opposite spins at the time of
their creation.

On Nov 12, 5:24*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 12, 4:59*pm, American wrote:











Uh, yeah, Brad, it kind of IS a holy grail of Physics, because you're
leaving out anything else that does not get included with a single
aether, which is also multiple universe theory. Some are even
speculating that the B.B. was a result of the intersection of two
universes, but one would have to consult Wheeler for that.

The idea that I get from MPC755, is that aether and matter are
completely separable, which would be nice if there was a limit to
quantum field theory. Since the theory is still in its infancy, one
can only speculate as to what aether DOESN'T consist of, and then
pretend that whatever is not yet known as the quantum field, or
quantum particles for that matter, is pushing back on whatever we can
label "mass". But we're only validating more of the 'spooky action at
a distance', manifested by things like quantum entanglement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

What I'd rather propose is a general theory that eliminates the spooky
action altogether, and replaces it with a different kind of duality
action between the two, i.e. unipolar particles, that can exhibit a
photon time dilation per unit wavelength, or quantity of TIME-space
COMPRESSION for SPACE-time EXPANSION, or even vice versa, within an
interuniversally exchanging medium of mass resonance.

The only waves that can achieve this phenomenon across the surface of
a superconductor are the phonons, IMO.

There is no such thing as entanglement. Downconverted photon pairs are
created as exact opposite with exact opposite angular momentums. They
are detected with certain spins because they are created that way. No
entanglement. No hidden variables. No spooky action at a distance.
Conservation of momentum of the original photon means the
downconverted photon pair have exact opposite spins at the time of
their creation.

Spooky action over distance is what its been proven all about. TeBert

On Nov 12, 5:31*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Nov 12, 5:24*pm, mpc755 wrote:









On Nov 12, 4:59*pm, American wrote:

Uh, yeah, Brad, it kind of IS a holy grail of Physics, because you're
leaving out anything else that does not get included with a single
aether, which is also multiple universe theory. Some are even
speculating that the B.B. was a result of the intersection of two
universes, but one would have to consult Wheeler for that.

The idea that I get from MPC755, is that aether and matter are
completely separable, which would be nice if there was a limit to
quantum field theory. Since the theory is still in its infancy, one
can only speculate as to what aether DOESN'T consist of, and then
pretend that whatever is not yet known as the quantum field, or
quantum particles for that matter, is pushing back on whatever we can
label "mass". But we're only validating more of the 'spooky action at
a distance', manifested by things like quantum entanglement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

What I'd rather propose is a general theory that eliminates the spooky
action altogether, and replaces it with a different kind of duality
action between the two, i.e. unipolar particles, that can exhibit a
photon time dilation per unit wavelength, or quantity of TIME-space
COMPRESSION for SPACE-time EXPANSION, or even vice versa, within an
interuniversally exchanging medium of mass resonance.

The only waves that can achieve this phenomenon across the surface of
a superconductor are the phonons, IMO.

There is no such thing as entanglement. Downconverted photon pairs are
created as exact opposite with exact opposite angular momentums. They
are detected with certain spins because they are created that way. No
entanglement. No hidden variables. No spooky action at a distance.
Conservation of momentum of the original photon means the
downconverted photon pair have exact opposite spins at the time of
their creation.

Spooky action over distance is what its been proven all about. *TeBert

There is no such thing as spooky action at a distance. Downconverted
photon pairs are created as exact opposites.

On Nov 12, 2:19*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 12, 4:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 12, 1:05*pm, mpc755 wrote:

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

In other words, you don't have any clue as to its volumetric unit of
bulk or that of its minimum unit of volume that aether can represent.

'Minimum unit of volume'? Aether exists everywhere particles of matter
do not.

Then it is inside of atoms, and since atoms are 99.9999999% empty,
means that our planet is at the very least 99.9999999% empty space
that aether is occupying.

Is this aether within atoms also worth 96% of their mass, or is it
merely 50/50 equal in mass?

On Nov 12, 2:31*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Nov 12, 5:24*pm, mpc755 wrote:









On Nov 12, 4:59*pm, American wrote:

Uh, yeah, Brad, it kind of IS a holy grail of Physics, because you're
leaving out anything else that does not get included with a single
aether, which is also multiple universe theory. Some are even
speculating that the B.B. was a result of the intersection of two
universes, but one would have to consult Wheeler for that.

The idea that I get from MPC755, is that aether and matter are
completely separable, which would be nice if there was a limit to
quantum field theory. Since the theory is still in its infancy, one
can only speculate as to what aether DOESN'T consist of, and then
pretend that whatever is not yet known as the quantum field, or
quantum particles for that matter, is pushing back on whatever we can
label "mass". But we're only validating more of the 'spooky action at
a distance', manifested by things like quantum entanglement:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

What I'd rather propose is a general theory that eliminates the spooky
action altogether, and replaces it with a different kind of duality
action between the two, i.e. unipolar particles, that can exhibit a
photon time dilation per unit wavelength, or quantity of TIME-space
COMPRESSION for SPACE-time EXPANSION, or even vice versa, within an
interuniversally exchanging medium of mass resonance.

The only waves that can achieve this phenomenon across the surface of
a superconductor are the phonons, IMO.

There is no such thing as entanglement. Downconverted photon pairs are
created as exact opposite with exact opposite angular momentums. They
are detected with certain spins because they are created that way. No
entanglement. No hidden variables. No spooky action at a distance.
Conservation of momentum of the original photon means the
downconverted photon pair have exact opposite spins at the time of
their creation.

Spooky action over distance is what its been proven all about. *TeBert

Actually it's quantum entangled photons that are being created and
detected, with no entanglement delay regardless of the distance.

btw; this still doesn't prove or otherwise substantiate that
individual photons actually move.

On Nov 12, 8:37*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:19*pm, mpc755 wrote:









On Nov 12, 4:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 12, 1:05*pm, mpc755 wrote:

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

In other words, you don't have any clue as to its volumetric unit of
bulk or that of its minimum unit of volume that aether can represent.

'Minimum unit of volume'? Aether exists everywhere particles of matter
do not.

Then it is inside of atoms, and since atoms are 99.9999999% empty,
means that our planet is at the very least 99.9999999% empty space
that aether is occupying.


Yes.

Is this aether within atoms also worth 96% of their mass, or is it
merely 50/50 equal in mass?

It's not 96% of there mass. 96% of the mass in the Universe is not
particles of matter. 96% of the mass of the Universe is the aether.
You do realize most of the Universe does not consist of particles of
matter, correct? That space consists of aether. Aether has mass.

On Nov 12, 8:47*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 12, 8:37*pm, Brad Guth wrote:









On Nov 12, 2:19*pm, mpc755 wrote:

On Nov 12, 4:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 12, 1:05*pm, mpc755 wrote:

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

In other words, you don't have any clue as to its volumetric unit of
bulk or that of its minimum unit of volume that aether can represent.

..... ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.... AHAHAHA....

Jail bird "G=EMC^2" wrote:
--- mpc755 wrote:
----- Brad Guth wrote:
Snippedy-dooo because

The Jewish Jailbird "G=EMC^2" wrote:
Aether has mass in it, like water has fish.
Aether's structure is all force waves,as proven TeBet

hanson wrote:
At least, Hebe-Herbie, you should have said
"Gefilte Fish", instead of just "fish", which is why
you should not be surprised that folks like

"Uncle Al" Schwartz wrote
& posted to you, his fellow kike, long time ago, over & over:
"Glazier, you are an embarrassment for the Jewish
community. idiot"... .... and

Harlow Campbell "Mr.HVAC: wrote
& posted just recently:
"TreBert: you are one stupid cocksucker"

On Nov 12, 8:54*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Nov 12, 8:47*pm, mpc755 wrote:









On Nov 12, 8:37*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 12, 2:19*pm, mpc755 wrote:

On Nov 12, 4:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 12, 1:05*pm, mpc755 wrote:

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

In other words, you don't have any clue as to its volumetric unit of
bulk or that of its minimum unit of volume that aether can represent.

'Minimum unit of volume'? Aether exists everywhere particles of matter
do not.

Then it is inside of atoms, and since atoms are 99.9999999% empty,
means that our planet is at the very least 99.9999999% empty space
that aether is occupying.

Yes.

Is this aether within atoms also worth 96% of their mass, or is it
merely 50/50 equal in mass?

It's not 96% of there mass. 96% of the mass in the Universe is not
particles of matter. 96% of the mass of the Universe is the aether.
You do realize most of the Universe does not consist of particles of
matter, correct? That space consists of aether. Aether has mass.

Aether has mass in it,like water has fish. Aether's structure is all
force waves,as proven *TeBet

Aether has particles of matter in it, like water has fish. Fish
displace the water, like particles of matter displace the aether.

On Nov 12, 5:47*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 12, 8:37*pm, Brad Guth wrote:









On Nov 12, 2:19*pm, mpc755 wrote:

On Nov 12, 4:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 12, 1:05*pm, mpc755 wrote:

Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward
matter is gravity.

A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a
double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and
the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

In other words, you don't have any clue as to its volumetric unit of
bulk or that of its minimum unit of volume that aether can represent.