#1
|
|||
|
|||
Type II or NELG?
I can't seem to find a definitive distinction between a galaxy with a
type-II narrow-line AGN core and a so-called NELG ("narrow emission-line galaxy"). NELGs seem to have gone out of fashion without anybody publishing them in recent years. Type-IIs have a chequered history in that different researchers defined them in different ways for a long time, although nowadays they are universally regarded as narrow-line equivalents of AGN. So in my quasar publications I make a distinction between broad-line QSOSs and AGNs in that the latter are seen inside galaxies and the former are not (never mind the transitional ones for now), but the narrow-line type-II objects are not so divided. However, both kinds are seen. To be consistent I should divide them as well. It's naturally tempting to designate NELGs as type-II emitters within galaxies -- it would make use of a well-known classification which has sort of dropped out of use. Does anyone know a good reason why this would be a bad idea, whether different forbidden lines or whatever? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difference between 'Optical Spectral Type' and 'IR Spectral Type'? | eric948470 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | March 8th 11 10:34 PM |
New type of star | GSWeb8 | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | December 12th 09 04:40 AM |
no can type | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 12 | January 4th 09 06:51 PM |
17mm Type 4 or 16mm Type 5? | Gregory | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | June 8th 05 04:14 AM |
Nagler 11m type 6 | Francesco Verardi | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 8th 04 11:18 PM |