|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Will ISS survive republican & tea party budget cuts?
Le 09/11/10 03:02, Fred J. McCall a écrit :
jacob wrote: Le 08/11/10 14:10, Fred J. McCall a écrit : jacob wrote: For instance look at: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3150 quote Tax trends for the top 400 taxpayers CBO says that the Top 5% of income earners (~$400k and above) are paying around a 30% tax rate. WHERE does it say that? WHICH DOCUMENT ? Why are you screaming, you ****ing loon? Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979-2001; April 2004. The data hasn't change much, as shown in Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007; June 2010 What a strange coincidence. That data stops before the Bush tax cuts. Just a coincidence of course. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Will ISS survive republican & tea party budget cuts?
Le 10/11/10 05:05, Fred J. McCall a écrit :
jacob wrote: Le 09/11/10 03:02, Fred J. McCall a écrit : jacob wrote: Le 08/11/10 14:10, Fred J. McCall a écrit : jacob wrote: For instance look at: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3150 quote Tax trends for the top 400 taxpayers CBO says that the Top 5% of income earners (~$400k and above) are paying around a 30% tax rate. WHERE does it say that? WHICH DOCUMENT ? Why are you screaming, you ****ing loon? Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979-2001; April 2004. The data hasn't change much, as shown in Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007; June 2010 What a strange coincidence. That data stops before the Bush tax cuts. Just a coincidence of course. The Bush tax cuts occurred after 2007? Who knew? The data you refer to stops in 2001. Read what you post. Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979-2001; April 2004. 1979-2001. Before the bush tax cuts. They changed everything. They are the main reason for the deficit of the U.S. The very rich pay no taxes anymore... Obviously you do not disput the numbers of the Center for Budget and policiy priorities. Just read their documentation. It cuts through all that republican lies. Yes, the rich pay taxes but much less than the poor. But it is a waste of time discussing with you in particular and republicans in general. Anyway. You won. You have the best democracuy money can buy. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Will ISS survive republican & tea party budget cuts?
On Nov 10, 8:48*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
jacob navia wrote: Le 10/11/10 05:05, Fred J. McCall a crit : jacob *wrote: Le 09/11/10 03:02, Fred J. McCall a crit : jacob * wrote: Le 08/11/10 14:10, Fred J. McCall a crit : jacob * *wrote: For instance look at: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3150 quote Tax trends for the top 400 taxpayers CBO says that the Top 5% of income earners (~$400k and above) are paying around a 30% tax rate. WHERE does it say that? WHICH DOCUMENT ? Why are you screaming, you ****ing loon? Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979-2001; April 2004. The data hasn't change much, as shown in Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007; June 2010 What a strange coincidence. That data stops before the Bush tax cuts. Just a coincidence of course. The Bush tax cuts occurred after 2007? *Who knew? The data you refer to stops in 2001. Read what you post. I did. *Now you go back and do it. *The second data set I pointed to was published in 2010 and goes through 2007. Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979-2001; April 2004. 1979-2001. Before the bush tax cuts. They changed everything. They are the main reason for the deficit of the U.S. The data hasn't change much, as shown in Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007; June 2010 The very rich pay no taxes anymore... Bull****. *You are a liar. Yes, the rich pay taxes but much less than the poor. Bull****. *See CBO publication Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007; June 2010. *You are a liar. Anyway. You won. You have the best democracuy money can buy. Whereas you are too stupid to know what you've got. -- "You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of *your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-- Mark Twain Obviously you qualify for all those nifty perks that mostly republicans worked hard to get, and now we can't afford those perks or the likes of yourself. Go figure. ~ BG |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Will ISS survive republican & tea party budget cuts?
On Nov 11, 1:05*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 10, 8:48*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote: jacob navia wrote: Le 10/11/10 05:05, Fred J. McCall a crit : jacob *wrote: Le 09/11/10 03:02, Fred J. McCall a crit : jacob * wrote: Le 08/11/10 14:10, Fred J. McCall a crit : jacob * *wrote: For instance look at: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3150 quote Tax trends for the top 400 taxpayers CBO says that the Top 5% of income earners (~$400k and above) are paying around a 30% tax rate. WHERE does it say that? WHICH DOCUMENT ? Why are you screaming, you ****ing loon? Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979-2001; April 2004. The data hasn't change much, as shown in Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007; June 2010 What a strange coincidence. That data stops before the Bush tax cuts. Just a coincidence of course. The Bush tax cuts occurred after 2007? *Who knew? The data you refer to stops in 2001. Read what you post. I did. *Now you go back and do it. *The second data set I pointed to was published in 2010 and goes through 2007. Effective Federal Tax Rates: 1979-2001; April 2004. 1979-2001. Before the bush tax cuts. They changed everything. They are the main reason for the deficit of the U.S. The data hasn't change much, as shown in Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007; June 2010 The very rich pay no taxes anymore... Bull****. *You are a liar. Yes, the rich pay taxes but much less than the poor. Bull****. *See CBO publication Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007; June 2010. *You are a liar. Anyway. You won. You have the best democracuy money can buy. Whereas you are too stupid to know what you've got. -- "You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of *your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-- Mark Twain Obviously you qualify for all those nifty perks that mostly republicans worked hard to get, and now we can't afford those perks or the likes of yourself. *Go figure. *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Try to make Social Security more solvent by reducing annual cost-of- living increases for many recipients; raise the regular retirement age to 68 years by 2050 from the current 66, and to 69 by 2075; and make benefits more progressive to help Americans in lower-earning tax brackets. But changes would only benefit the Social Security program, not broader budget deficits. A gradual 15-percent a gallon increase in the federal gasoline tax from the current 18.4 cents. Reform cost-of-living increases for early civilian and military retirees. Reduce Congressional and White House budgets by 15 percent; freeze federal salaries, bonuses, and other compensation at non-Defense agencies for three years; cut the federal workforce by 10 percent; and slow the growth of foreign aid. Eliminate all congressional earmarks. Eliminate funding for commercial spaceflight. Sell excess federal property. Consolidate the tax code into three individual rates and one corporate rate; eliminate the alternative minimum tax and some expense-write-off programs; increase the federal gas tax and some other user fees. Reduce farm subsidies by $3 billion per year by reducing direct payments and other subsidies. Make scores of other changes, including an end to payments to states and tribes for abandoned mines; an extension of the Federal Communications Commission's authority to auction radio spectrum licenses; a requirement that the Tennessee Valley Authority impose transmission surcharge on electricity sales. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the 7 cuts of galen | Zomp | SETI | 0 | July 17th 07 07:10 AM |
How to be immune from budget cuts | blart | Policy | 64 | October 4th 05 06:16 AM |
Big ISS cuts | Pat Flannery | History | 3 | April 23rd 05 09:13 PM |
Power cuts | Martin Frey | UK Astronomy | 12 | August 15th 03 07:03 PM |