|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
EPOXI Successfully Flies by Comet Hartley 2
wrote:
For more information about EPOXI visit http://www.nasa.gov/epoxi and http://epoxi.umd.edu/. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/epoxi/index.html The images there make it look like a giant drumstick. Does that mean that the spacecraft's next task is to find the rest of the giant space chicken, or will they be looking for the KFC?-) rick jones -- web2.0 n, the dot.com reunion tour... these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
EPOXI Successfully Flies by Comet Hartley 2
On 11/4/2010 2:41 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
wrote: For more information about EPOXI visit http://www.nasa.gov/epoxi and http://epoxi.umd.edu/. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/epoxi/index.html The images there make it look like a giant drumstick. Does that mean that the spacecraft's next task is to find the rest of the giant space chicken, or will they be looking for the KFC?-) It's been described as looking like a peanut, but it reminded me of a dumbbell. Whatever the shape, it looks either like two objects that joined into one, or one basically cylindrical one whose rotation caused loose material to migrate to the ends via centrifugal force as outgassing made it spin. Pat |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
EPOXI Successfully Flies by Comet Hartley 2
On Nov 4, 3:41*pm, Rick Jones wrote:
wrote: For more information about EPOXI visithttp://www.nasa.gov/epoxiand http://epoxi.umd.edu/. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/epoxi/index.html The images there make it look like a giant drumstick. *Does that mean that the spacecraft's next task is to find the rest of the giant space chicken, or will they be looking for the KFC?-) rick jones -- web2.0 n, the dot.com reunion tour... these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... The inert comet/asteroid Hartley 2 103P/Hartley 2 (albedo of 45% is roughly twice as physically dark as that of our moon, and by many others experienced in such albedo ratings have its visual reflectance at less than 3%, because those highly charged surrounding particles don’t really count) http://cometography.com/pcomets/103p.html Notice all them pesky stars, as having been obtained entirely from Earth and thus having the polluted atmosphere always in the way. Of course those official EPOXI images are nearly starless: http://epoxi.umd.edu/3gallery/20101104_CA.shtml Perhaps because their own spendy cameras have such **** poor dynamic range and no atmospheric interference, as well as their offering us no colors/hues to speak of, thereby telling us nothing whatsoever about whatever minerals/elements that this comet/asteroid has to offer. Even the previously obtained spectrographic results from Keck and Hubble are still being kept taboo/nondisclosure rated. Kinda like scientific need-to-know extortion, in that we get to pay them more of our hard earned loot before they fork anything over. I think my free cell phone camera offers better dynamic range than EPOXI, as well as colors/hues to boot. How many all-inclusive millions to date has this EPOXI cost us? ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EPOXI Spacecraft Hurtles Toward Active Comet Hartley 2 | Painius | Misc | 2 | October 18th 10 02:22 PM |
Comet Hartley 2 | Sketcher | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | September 12th 10 09:53 PM |