|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#831
|
|||
|
|||
Sure, no problem, Daniel. I'll just run out to Radio Shack today,
shop-lift a digital camera and a scanner, and I'll get right back to you! :-) God, there are some real snobs on the Internet. And, what do you mean "I would not be surprised if the FBI was called in to try and shed some light on the issue."??? I thought you had become the resident expert on Apollo One? Yet you don't know what role the FBI played??? They were "called in" for a truckload of issues--have you not been paying attention? They did the analysis on the log books, "interviewed" the NASA security chief (although they seem to have "lost" that interview,) took fingerprints from both the translation controller and the BMAG switch, and many other roles. But, apparently you didn't read the documents you posted or you would KNOW they were involved...up to their EYEBALLS. Further, if your buddy Hedrick spent half as much time at his beloved library as he TALKS about spending, he would know (IF his library had the documents that are at the National Archives, which it does NOT) HE would know as well. OH, that's right, Hedrick has special connections; I forgot. He doesn't HAVE to use FOIA. His research has NEVER required FOIA--again, I ask what he could POSSIBLY have researched that didn't require FOIA. But, since he's SO special, surely he knows what role the FBI played by sheer osmosis. Perhaps you can ask him? Hee hee. (Yes, I'm being sarcastic toward HIM, not you.) However, I AM wondering why you are talking like two weeks of reading has made you an expert, yet you don't know the extent of the FBI's involvement, never mind the other federal agencies involved. PERHAPS because it takes more than two weeks to study this issue? LaDonna |
#832
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
... I thought you had become the resident expert on Apollo One? Yet you don't know what role the FBI played??? snip You are more than welcome to quote documents just like me. You type what 90 wpm? On more than one occasion I have flatly stated I have not read the entire report. As for the record of the discsuuion, it speaks for itself--loudly. You have spent as much time arguing with Scott as you have answering questions or adding to our understanding of the accident. Daniel |
#833
|
|||
|
|||
In article bzyGc.52488$Yu.18781@fed1read04,
"Charleston" wrote: You have spent as much time arguing with Scott as you have answering questions or adding to our understanding of the accident. You're being generous, Daniel. She's spent substantially less time discussing verifiable fact than she has spent making allegations, drawing specious conclusions and lying outright (e.g., claims that I sent her email). Be that as it may, I continue to appreciate your contributions to the general level of knowledge of AS-204, Daniel. Thank you. -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." ~ Robert A. Heinlein http://www.angryherb.net |
#834
|
|||
|
|||
"Charleston" wrote in message news:bzyGc.52488$Yu.18781@fed1read04...
wrote in message ... I thought you had become the resident expert on Apollo One? Yet you don't know what role the FBI played??? snip You are more than welcome to quote documents just like me. You type what 90 wpm? On more than one occasion I have flatly stated I have not read the entire report. As for the record of the discsuuion, it speaks for itself--loudly. You have spent as much time arguing with Scott as you have answering questions or adding to our understanding of the accident. Daniel Well, my apologies, but I'm astonished that you sounded like (in that message) you had no real clue if the FBI was involved. How can you not know that? And yes, I type quickly, but Volume I of the Hearings is 300 some pages. I do not have the time to type all of that. When you get a copy you'll be free to read all you like. LaDonna |
#835
|
|||
|
|||
LaDonna Wyss wrote...
Well, my apologies, but I'm astonished that you sounded like (in that message) you had no real clue if the FBI was involved. How can you not know that? And yes, I type quickly, but Volume I of the Hearings is 300 some pages. I do not have the time to type all of that. When you get a copy you'll be free to read all you like. LaDonna and now, the reducto. - Peter |
#836
|
|||
|
|||
"Charleston" wrote in message news:moqGc.52468$Yu.14687@fed1read04... What I DO know is this: There was damage to the hand controller NASA could not explain; Cite, please. Actually this one is true as far as the damage goes and I would not be surprised if the FBI was called in to try and shed some light on the issue. I accept it as true- I want to know where she got her information from. "National Archives" or "Congressional Record" doesn't cut it. that is why they asked the FBI to take fingerprints for analysis (the results of which the FBI refuses to disclose.) So instant cover-up? Cite, please. Yes that would be interesting. P.S. If anyone wants "proof" the FBI took fingerprints, and that they are now claiming ignorance, email me and I will send it to you. How can you possibly send paper through the Internet? You have to fold it up pretty small but it is easier to scan it or take a digital photo and send it an e-mail attachement:-) There has been recent breakthroughs in teleportation research, but at the moment it seems to be limited to transfering simple information about one photon to another. Paper looks quite a ways off. |
#837
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... Hedrick, do you not have a job? Of course. Several. I'm extremely good at them, which gives me plenty of free time. Go do it, would you? I *am* doing one of them when I reply to you. There ARE people in here who ARE asking intelligent questions. Yes, there are, and you might consider joining us someday. |
#838
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... You are ASS U MING that. No matter how many times you ask, I am not going to have sex with you. |
#839
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... Daniel, you are well aware of my technological constraints. THat's not his problem, and it's irrelevant. You're the one with the claims, it's your burden. You could greatly ease your burden by providing verifiable cites, so that others could then locate the relevant documents. If *you* could find them, my cat could. There are plenty of people in this group a lot better at it than you are, so all you need to do is provide a complete, proper cite. |
#840
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... Sure, no problem, Daniel. I'll just run out to Radio Shack today, shop-lift a digital camera and a scanner, and I'll get right back to you! :-) You could, but a verifiable cite would cost you less. God, there are some real snobs on the Internet. It's *your* club. I thought you had become the resident expert on Apollo One? Better than you. Yet you don't know what role the FBI played??? They were "called in" for a truckload of issues Such as? Cite, please. Further, if your buddy Hedrick spent half as much time at his beloved library as he TALKS about spending I'd be happy to do that *just as soon as you provide the verifiable cites*. Why, if you were to provide complete, verifiable cites on just a fraction of the horse**** you've claimed, I'd be so busy checking it out I wouldn't have time to post. Want me to go away? Start providing complete, verifiable cites, including the names and jurisdictions of the law enforcement personnel you spoke to about Apollo 1. , he would know (IF his library had the documents that are at the National Archives, which it does NOT) What's the name of the library? How do *you* know what it does or doesn't have if you don't even know the name? OH, that's right, Hedrick has special connections; I forgot. Better than yours, clearly. He doesn't HAVE to use FOIA. His research has NEVER required FOIA--again, It's amazing what a reasonable, intelligent request can get. Try it sometime. I ask what he could POSSIBLY have researched that didn't require FOIA. Many things. You're free to buy one of my books and see. But, since he's SO special, surely he knows what role the FBI played by sheer osmosis. You said you've done the research, so let's see what you've found out. I haven't made any claims about the role of the FBI in the Apollo 1 incident, but *you* have, so it's *your* burden. However, I AM wondering why you are talking like two weeks of reading has made you an expert He's taken after you, obviously. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|