A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Onward to Extinction: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) WEAKENS IMMUNE SYSTEM



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 29th 04, 02:30 AM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Onward to Extinction: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) WEAKENS IMMUNE SYSTEM

On 28 Apr 2004 13:08:19 -0700, (Bob Carlson) wrote:

No, not the death of the human species. More likely a tweak in the
natural evolution.


Natural evolution to what? Got any evidence that human beings are evolving?

  #12  
Old April 29th 04, 02:34 AM
The CO
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Onward to Extinction: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) WEAKENS IMMUNE SYSTEM


"*" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:42:33 +0930, "The CO"


wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:31:27 +0930, "The CO"


wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
http://www.chem-tox.com/immunesystem/radiation/emr.htm

You've posted a lot of stuff.

Who are you and what is it that you want done?

Regards

The CO

The choice is entirely all yours.


What choice would that be?

You decide.


Between what and what?


Life or death of the human species.


Can we have a little plain speaking please.

What is it you think we should do then? What's your solution
to the 'problem' (and I'm not real clear on what the 'problem' is)

The CO


  #13  
Old April 29th 04, 03:02 AM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Onward to Extinction: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) WEAKENS IMMUNE SYSTEM

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:04:14 +0930, "The CO"
wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:42:33 +0930, "The CO"


wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:31:27 +0930, "The CO"

wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
http://www.chem-tox.com/immunesystem/radiation/emr.htm

You've posted a lot of stuff.

Who are you and what is it that you want done?

Regards

The CO

The choice is entirely all yours.

What choice would that be?

You decide.

Between what and what?


Life or death of the human species.


Can we have a little plain speaking please.


How much plainer can it be?

What is it you think we should do then? What's your solution
to the 'problem' (and I'm not real clear on what the 'problem' is)


If you can't understand there is a problem, then there is no solution.

The CO


  #14  
Old April 29th 04, 08:18 AM
The CO
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Onward to Extinction: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) WEAKENS IMMUNE SYSTEM


"*" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:04:14 +0930, "The CO"


wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:42:33 +0930, "The CO"


wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:31:27 +0930, "The CO"

wrote:


"*" wrote in message
.. .
http://www.chem-tox.com/immunesystem/radiation/emr.htm

You've posted a lot of stuff.

Who are you and what is it that you want done?

Regards

The CO

The choice is entirely all yours.

What choice would that be?

You decide.

Between what and what?

Life or death of the human species.


Can we have a little plain speaking please.


How much plainer can it be?


Condense it to a couple of sentences. List your complaints.
List your suggested remedies.

What is it you think we should do then? What's your solution
to the 'problem' (and I'm not real clear on what the 'problem' is)


If you can't understand there is a problem, then there is no solution.


Sure I can understand, if it's explained. So far you have just made a
lot
of wild claims about things (mostly) in the USA. I'm an Aussie.

Don't beat around the bush.

The CO



  #15  
Old April 29th 04, 08:21 AM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Onward to Extinction: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) WEAKENS IMMUNE SYSTEM

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:48:42 +0930, "The CO"
wrote:

Don't beat around the bush.


Oh sheesh, the USA is a free for all, with no order what so ever in
government, it's completely in shambles. The US government is a joke, it's
totally corrupt.
  #16  
Old April 29th 04, 08:28 AM
The CO
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Onward to Extinction: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) WEAKENS IMMUNE SYSTEM


Just a quick question. I keep seeing references claiming you are
someone called 'Alexa' or 'Andrea', is that who you are?


The CO


  #17  
Old April 29th 04, 04:08 PM
*
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Identifies of Unpaid Usenet Posters

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:58:22 +0930, "The CO"
wrote:


Just a quick question. I keep seeing references claiming you are
someone called 'Alexa' or 'Andrea', is that who you are?


It's not possible with ordinary means to determine the real life identity of
anyone who is not paid to post to Usenet.


To do that would require a phone tap and a way to verify the identity of the
person at the keyboard typing who is posting to Usenet. In other words, to
identify a Usenet poster would not only require the ability to tap their
phone but require some way to be able to see into their house or monitor
their particular brain wave pattern in order to identify the person posting
through the wire tap to Usenet.



The CO


  #18  
Old April 29th 04, 08:07 PM
Bob Carlson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Onward to Extinction: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION (EMR) WEAKENS IMMUNE SYSTEM

* wrote in message

Natural evolution to what? Got any evidence that human beings are evolving?


Just the evidence based on the appearance of the species in the fossil
record, appearance of habitual bipedal locomotion, tool use, language,
culture, taller, larger brain, etc.
  #20  
Old April 30th 04, 02:20 AM
The CO
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Identifies of Unpaid Usenet Posters


"*" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:58:22 +0930, "The CO"


wrote:


Just a quick question. I keep seeing references claiming you are
someone called 'Alexa' or 'Andrea', is that who you are?


It's not possible with ordinary means to determine the real life

identity of
anyone


Quite. Which is why I asked.

who is not paid to post to Usenet.


It's certain that there are people
who are paid to *read* usenet.
These would be doubtless FBI/CIA/NSA or
other alphabet agencies.

No one is paid to *post* to usenet, or more correctly, no one is paid
for the
act of posting to usenet. There'd be no point, even if you were in the
business
of swaying opinion. Not enough Joe Public in here to be worth the
trouble.

Now there *are* many usenet users who are being
paid *whilst* posting to usenet, ie they are at work and their jobs are
such that
they use newsgroups as a resource. This is mostly professional IT
personnel and scientific types (such as are in this group) and these are
for
the most part very down to earth practical people. Me for instance.
I'm an
IT professional and I'm most definitely getting paid whilst I am writing
this, (I also
do it from home on my own time - but it's part of my job to help
facilitate
educational and scientific communication, so I'm here on the schools $
as well.)

Remember that usenet began not as an audience for kooks and spammers,
but as
a discussion medium for scientists and academics in their professional
lives.
Some newsgroups (like this one) still exist for that purpose and posting
your
pseudo science here is not only off topic but guarantees you entry into
numerous
kill files, as most of us simply aren't interested in discussing your
wild claims *in this
forum* which is *specifically* for the science of Astronomy, not
political barrow pushing
or wild claims of conspiracies and suppression of alternate energy
technology.
Frankly, I couldn't think of a worse place to try and put your wild
ideas across, because no one here
will believe any part of what you are spouting. I have seen quite lucid
and
technical explanations (the ongoing babble about hydrogen being a case
in point)
from people with considerable scientific background and expertise
dismissed offhand
because it doesn't agree with your untrained tunnel vision views.
In short, take it somewhere else where you might find a receptive
audience, because
there isn't one in here.

You also seem to have the strange notion that anything you post here
will have some
kind of effect on the real world and that you are 'making a difference'
of some
kind by posting your wild claims.
You also have the equally bizarre notion that your diatribes are
sufficiently important
to warrant 'disinformation agents' to come in here and dismiss your
claims.
Nothing you write is important enough to matter to anyone, anywhere. If
it were, you
would be dead. Simple as that. You would have had a fatal car accident
or something.
The mere fact you are here and posting unmolested is because you and
your opinions
are of no importance. It doesn't matter what you say, or where you say
it, your wild
claims are just that and no one cares.
The only way you will be subject to intervention by the FBI or whoever
is if you make
what they consider to be a bona-fide threat against (say) the President
or some other
apparently genuine threat to carry out illegal activity, publish
*genuine* classified information
(not the bogus flying saucer crap), genuine information on the care and
feeding of WMD,
or in some other way convince them that you are a terrorist threat.
Otherwise you will be ignored as if you were simply another conspiracy
theory kook

Bear in mind also that it's very likely the majority of non professional
internet
users who *might* be minded to believe some of these wild claims have
never heard
of usenet or newsgroups, or only in the vaguest way. You aren't
reaching the right
audience, *especially* in any newsgroup beginning with sci. You might
try
posting in alt.fan.art-bell, I believe there are a lot of kindred
spirits in there.

To do that would require a phone tap and a way to verify the identity

of the
person at the keyboard typing who is posting to Usenet. In other

words, to
identify a Usenet poster would not only require the ability to tap

their
phone but require some way to be able to see into their house or

monitor
their particular brain wave pattern in order to identify the person

posting
through the wire tap to Usenet.


Whatever. You didn't answer my question. Is their assertion that this
is
who you are true, or not? Simple, direct question. No evasion please.

Are you capable of a simple, direct answer?

The CO


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LSC Room 103, LCCV, UPRCV Allen Thomson Policy 4 February 6th 04 12:20 AM
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS [email protected] \(formerly\) Astronomy Misc 273 December 28th 03 11:42 PM
Interstellar radiation part of Mars challenge Kent Betts History 0 December 10th 03 06:37 AM
New NASA Facility Will Help Protect Space Crews From Radiation Ron Baalke Space Station 0 October 14th 03 04:23 PM
GravityShieldingUpdates1.1 Stan Byers Astronomy Misc 2 August 1st 03 03:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.