|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Relativity of microwave background radiation map
I have questions about relativity of microwave background radiation
map. ---------------- Thought experiment: Observer A gathers information upon the area close to event horizon (for instance - microwave background radiation map). Observer B accomplishes the similar observation from different observation point. "Different observation point" means that B and A move relatively each other, or B is separated from A by distance. The particular redshift distribution patterns have to be different for A and B =(?) we may expect a different microwave background radiation maps as well. The more relative speed or distance the more different map would be acquired. Analogy with traditional horizon is good illustration (only for distance). The implication of it is striking (for me). The conditions shortly after Big Bang are a relative matter. Actually, it means that past is a relative matter. The "0/1" is a relative matter. And even more, the near Big Bang conditions may cause different fundamental laws of physics (see Smolin/Linde) and all subset of laws which still is able to manifest what I perceive as "background radiation map" and would allow me to keep self-identity, all this subset (may be beyond as well) is free to be chosen. May be "free will" is the direct implication of this freedom. The consequence of this is that the multiverse construct is not something hypothetical it is a daily life routine. Probably my assumption about "different map" may be wrong. ---------------- This thought experiment shows that the reality itself may be a relative matter. Questions: -Is it wrong assumption about "different maps"? - If maps are different does it cause the relativity of past? I would appreciate your comments. Thanks, George Buyanovsky |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Relativity of microwave background radiation map
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Absconding ISS to Venus L2 (VL2), whatever the radiation | Brad Guth | Space Station | 4 | February 2nd 05 01:59 AM |
Is Artificial Radiation Worse Than Natural? Yes! | Anonymous Sender | Space Shuttle | 3 | November 2nd 03 02:06 PM |
New NASA Facility Will Help Protect Space Crews From Radiation | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | October 14th 03 04:23 PM |